We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cavendish Financial Plc | CAV | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 11.25 | 08:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.25 | 11.25 | 11.25 | 11.25 | 11.25 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| TRAVEL & LEISURE |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 04/4/2024 10:28 by wessie Just bought a few more. Anyone have any thoughts on the dividend they may offer with full year results? |
Posted at 10/9/2003 14:17 by pawsnjaws Why are no trades taking place for CAV - does anyone know.. |
Posted at 09/7/2003 08:43 by silverdays Flack, another variant of murphy's law I would say - and one to which I too fall victim. I now have the offer to purchase document for my CAV shares. It says, as rambutan points out, that if he gets 90% then the rest will be purchased compulsorily. Annoyingly, it also keeps harking on about the offer being a premium on recent closing and 50% better than average CAV price over the last X months - but says nothing about the loss for the loyal fans like me who piled in at the float at 58p and subsequent purchasers up to £1.60 (including several players at the time - Wise, Burley, Myers, etc). The interesting point is that if he gets 70% then CAV will be withdrawn from AIM, making the minority holding very difficult to trade. Harding's widow has apparently pledged the family 20%, so he has the 70% already. The only thing stopping him getting 90% is what Sky does with their 10%. My feeling is that Sky will sell with some sweetner being offered to offset their hefty loss. I didn't want to sell, I also bought for sentimental values but I now reckon I might as well, rather than end up with a 'dead' holding that will probably have to be sold anyway.Any other shareholders have any thoughts on what to do or what Sky will do with their holding? |
Posted at 03/7/2003 13:26 by silverdays the telegraph today says that abramovich will now make an offer for the remaing 50% and take CAV private. harding's widow has pledged her 20% and some others too. But Sky are not guaranteed to agree with their 10% or so and the huge numbers of small shareholders (I bought a few at the float price of 58p) won't all want to sell either, especially if they bought high (up to 170p). What happens if I don't sell? At what % level does it become compulsory to sell the shares? |
Posted at 02/7/2003 09:43 by pawsnjaws Highly amusing notes, however I bought shares in Cav some 7 years ago at 81p ???? I am still hanging in for my money back - anyone got any good advice. |
Posted at 01/7/2003 21:25 by snowmann If anyone wondered why the spike in CAV share price , apparently Ken Bates is in talks with a Russian Consortium to sell Chelsea Village .Price is something like £ 140-60 mill including taking on present debts . Chelsea supporters may be pleased to get rid of Ken but a Russian consortium ?? Announcement is imminent apparently . |
Posted at 07/5/2003 13:30 by silverdays leeds and chelsea are no comparison imho. Chelsea's finished ground, hotels and general real estate value are massive plusses in CAV's favour. Leeds is a busted flush off the field (could still come good next season on it!)Re. earlier discussion on assets of over 200mill this has to be virtually all property (you might get 25mill on all the squad players as a job lot - gallas, terry, cole, lampard essentially) and can only be liquidated by destroying the club - but, hey, maybe whoever takes over from cuddly ken will see CAV as a property company! I believe CAV is well fixed for the future with or without champion's league football. The player wages will slowly come under control over the next 2 years and chelsea have some of the wealthiest supporters (except me) in the country that are and will be milked mercilessly (a recent trip for me and 2 sons to the bridge to see them thrash everton cost me over £150). Keep the faith, CAV will prosper. |
Posted at 01/5/2003 10:17 by marquis Looking at Chelsea's balance sheet;Fixed assets Tangible £176,669,000 Intangible £50,836,000 Totalling £227,505,000 With net current liabilities of £59,028,000, this produces a figure of total assets less current liabilities of £168,477,000. With a current market capitalisation of £27.1 million at 16p a share this makes the shares look good value..... or does it? ADVFN has a market-to-book ratio of 0.4, valuing Chelsea Village at £67.75 million. It is fortuitous that the property portfolio is worth so much, otherwise Chelsea would be rather 'unbalanced' on the balance sheet...... |
Posted at 01/3/2003 17:15 by hilary Marquis,Bates was trying to do a deal with Al Fayed. Al Fayed was going to take the unissued stock in CAV at a premium and Fulham were going to ground share with Chelsea. The ground share part of the deal has run into two problems (it needs planning permission which is unlikely to be obtained before August plus the to-be-laid new pitch will not be adequate for 40+ games a season) so the deal currently looks like it's probably dead. |
Posted at 05/3/2002 18:13 by hilary Monaco,I'm not sure I understand your affinity with CAV. I've already stated that I don't hold and don't consider them to be a current buy and, as you don't rate them either, I don't know why you keep coming back here. In the meantime, I've found something especially for you - . Love and kisses. Hil. PS. They do trade at approx 20% of assets. Check the wording of my post. If I'd meant nett assets I'd have said so. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
