We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
---|---|---|---|
Cambridge Cognition Holdings Plc | COG | London | Ordinary Share |
Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
---|---|---|---|---|
27.50 | 27.50 | 28.00 | 27.50 |
Industry Sector |
---|
HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SERVICES |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 31/8/2024 10:30 by bmcollins @earwacksYou will find some on youtube, there are 2 interviews with management by proactive investors, most recent one 8 months ago & the latest posting is a piece by share price Angel's head of health care giving his thoughts which is only 3 months old. |
Posted at 31/8/2024 09:25 by earwacks I remember a few years back a director of an aim company telling me his solicitor advised reporting as a little to the market as possible and preferably nothing at all. Some seem to have turned this in to an absolute art form, others seem to court the market too much. You only have to look at the top holders list in COG to see they are not too bothered with investor relations with PIs. I seem to remember Vox markets or Paul Scot saying they hoped to do an interview with Cog. Presumably too busy or not keen. It does seem that private investor’s frequent trades can mess with the share price on very low volumes. I guess this can become an issue with small companies when trying to raise finance |
Posted at 31/8/2024 08:03 by 40 fathoms For reasons known only to them, they never publish a copy of the investor meeting or the investor deck. This is very frustrating and unnecessarily complicates the process of monitoring or researching the company. |
Posted at 24/8/2024 11:03 by earwacks @40Fathoms. End of September when the loan note news was made public the share price was @92p. By the time they issued the warrants on October 5th the share price had dropped to low 70s. I think the key is what date the execution of the loan took place. Unless it was written in stone about the 91p looks like the 5 day average weighting was around 74 p. The only thing definite in the September RNS is that the warrants will equate to £540000. About £125000 difference, unfortunate but in the grand scheme maybe not too bad. Probably took them by surprise, as they thought the loan was the better fund raise option. Then all the delays kicked in and we are where we are. I wouldn’t have bought anymore if not for the drop, so in the long run if it works out will be in a better position. Looking back on the mysterious ‘ existing investor’ they took 955000 shares which is about £325,000. So maybe not Claret as I don’t recall them having any shares. Hoping this is one of those IHT free stock. Trouble is good aim companies keep getting taken over, so not a very reliable plan long term! |
Posted at 24/8/2024 07:38 by earwacks @40 Fathoms. Indeed. October 5th 2023. Claret were given the right to subscribe to any future funding up to £500,000. I guess it is possible that they did participate in the placing. Seem to remember a separate note about an investor taking somewhere around 900,000 shares in addition to the offer which fits the £500,000 deal I mentioned but not notifiable. Curiously 74p is about where it needs to be for me to break even, having added a few more yesterday. The warrants issued for subscription are 722,565 @.74.734 being the lower average weighted price 5 days preceding execution of the £3 million loan note. So potentially Claret could inject another £540,000. Might be a while before they decided to do that funded by the interest they receive on the loan note! |
Posted at 23/8/2024 12:48 by earwacks A lot of observer/investors having a fresh look at this, realising they are now in a pretty healthy situation, not with standing some meaty contracts being fulfilled. Just wondering how Claret ( European loan note provider )stands with Cog . They have warrants to buy £550,000 of share at around 72p. Interesting they didn’t partake in the placing. Any views? panmure reiterate £1.50 price target. gl all |
Posted at 22/8/2024 14:23 by bmcollins @ Jasper@40 Fathoms Thanks for that, I am a "newbie" in this stock, I entered just after the last placing as it seemed that they had a very good story and they had been run well but suffering, as are so many AIM co's, from a lack of interest by most investors. I would normally buy a stock like this through a vct but the tightening of the rules for AIM vct's has made it tempting to buy direct and especially after a placing at a low price historically and which has given the co a decent runway where there is a coherent chance of success, as I believe there is here. |
Posted at 06/6/2024 08:30 by greyingsurfer So your complaint that they do not like retail investors is based upon the fact that their AGM clashes with another. Presumably you think they should have rung you to check first? |
Posted at 06/6/2024 07:32 by cerrito As mentioned above, they do not like retail investors now evidenced by the fact that they have moved the timing of their AGM forward to 9am.I cannot go as another company where I am more heavily invested has an AGM that morning. |
Posted at 04/6/2024 05:07 by 40 fathoms @earwacks you can apply for more than your pro-rata allocation should you wish to do so, as you can oversubscribe for shares.I think the principle of allowing shareholders who wish to participate the opportunity to do so, is an important one. However, you are right that retail investors historically have very poor participation rates in open offers and most of the larger shareholders will have had the opportunity to participate via the placement. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions