Bos Glb Hldgs Share Discussion Threads

[falia] 22/9/2017 11:24

YES BUYERS COMING IN AGAIN

[letmepass] 22/9/2017 11:23

Next leg up about to begin

[falia] 22/9/2017 10:57

REMEMBER 9P PAID FOR THEIR STOCK

[falia] 22/9/2017 10:57

6.3 ARE ALL BUYS

[falia] 22/9/2017 10:55

LOOKING GOOD, FEELING GOOD COLIN ,MATEY

[colin12345678] 22/9/2017 10:46

whos the BOS Falia how are you me old moneymaker charm

[falia] 22/9/2017 10:44

BOOM TIME BOYS & GIRLS

[falia] 22/9/2017 10:43

ALL BUYING NOW

[falia] 22/9/2017 10:38

YES 9P+ COMING

[ssnichani] 22/9/2017 10:34

Smell burning pwhite73.

[falia] 22/9/2017 10:34

BUYING AT 75% PREMIUM

[pwhite73] 22/9/2017 10:31

Like all AIM companies diectors have to reduce their holdings to 0%. This is so that the coming years of dilutive equity issues has no effect on their personal wealth. As for these new institution holders look them up for duck sake. Let's see what you find.

[letmepass] 22/9/2017 10:25

8p here we come

[falia] 22/9/2017 10:22

NOT THATS HIS BELOW 30%, SHOULD BE NO MORE OFFLOADING

[the skipper] 22/9/2017 09:18

Here's MT's explanation:

"For some time now I wanted BOS GLOBAL to have publicly stated significant shareholders with greater than 5% ownership each. Also, to know that such significant shareholders understand and believe in the vision of BOS on AIM, its people and their commitment, capability and experience; more so they understand the value of the products, patents and market opportunity to exponentially grow as a publicly listed software company selling via distributions networks.

Each of the three new and publicly named significant shareholders by BOS GLOBAL on 21 September 2017 met my selection criteria to part with my ownership!

For the many shareholders wondering why I have reduced my holding to 29.9%, here are some of the key reasons:

1. My then shareholding (~44+%) in BOS was at the limit of Shareholder Approval under the Corporation Act for an Australian public company (refer AIM Admission Document), and therefore I could not convert Convertible Note draw-downs; and

2. The Relationship Agreement (refer AIM Admission Document) limited my ability in some cases to exercise certain voting rights as both Board Member and Executive and whilst a Major Shareholder above 30% ownership, HOWEVER IT SERVED ITS EXACT PURPOSE AND ALLOWED THE BOARD AND COMPANY TO FUNCTION WITH FIRM GOVERNANCE PRACTICES!; and

3. I owned too much of BOS and it needs a good spread of sophisticated and aligned significant shareholders."

Make of it what you will....

[pwhite73] 22/9/2017 09:01

tmmalik

Both companies are worthless and survive like 99% of AIM listed companies on PI money. We'll take your money in exchange for dreams of riches. Call Design been traded since 1999....and they're only listing now??

[tmmalik] 22/9/2017 07:36

I disagree ,bos has 40 per of call design and has prov to buy fullSo it very interesting now which side take which

[the skipper] 21/9/2017 19:14

It's pretty obvious what's happening here. Travia needs some dosh towards a takeover of BOS by Call Design so it can secure a listing. He had to resign and reduce his holding below 30% so he could vote his shares, and the buyers will have agreed to support the motions. This way he gets around having to pay more than 16p a share for the t/o under the AIM rules. Expect offer price to be somewhere between 9 and 16p.

Ergo a screamig buy at current price imho

[pwhite73] 21/9/2017 18:30

Exactly they must think PIs are stupid. Well we are but leaving that aside if these interested parties were buying at 9p two days ago which mug is still offloading at 4.75p.

[defcon3] 21/9/2017 17:15

Bad. Price irrelevant. Travia selling is a red flag

[brx7] 21/9/2017 17:10

WOW good or bad?these mates trying to prop up the shares or genuine interest in call design float