Bluejay Mining Share Discussion Threads

[squiresquire] 13/3/2018 16:09

presto

Camerons outright criticism of her backed up by the Queens clear disdain and distrust of the woman tell me far more than your claim she was simply deft at politics.

I guess you deny she allowed her grubby son to earn himself the 20 million as claimed by the British press in his arms dealing, with her signing the deal.

Dont forget her fall from grace was after her best mates had stabbed her in the back so desperate were they to remove her from public odium.

[squiresquire] 13/3/2018 15:54

the only time Thatcher, being the sneaky brute she was, took any interest at all in assisting the end of Apartheid was when she saw the writing on the wall for the oppressive and sadistic leaders of the regime.

As for Mugabe, well once again our foreign policy created a nut, like we did with Saddam or the Assads.

[squiresquire] 13/3/2018 15:49

the ANC under Mandela were forced to eventually take up armed struggle after Sharpesville when the white rulers shot 60 or 70 people at a peaceful gathering, they were forced to be the same as their rulers, ie brutal.

[luckykids] 13/3/2018 15:14

Funny how it goes back to 24p exactly double the last placing. Looks like seller to be cleared.

[devereaux] 13/3/2018 15:14

aravali re 2704

You got the "fall" bit right but it is not very nice !

[aravali] 13/3/2018 14:34

great article in FT today, re: chinese (unwanted) investment in German companies, particularly in light of the recent acquisition of 10% in Daimler.
within China's industrial 10 year plan, announced last year, one of the 10 points highlights the need for strategic metals...maybe our assets fall nicely into that category!

[presto77] 13/3/2018 08:42

Thatcher never supported apartheid!She tried to bring regime down softly to avoid civil war....and it worked over time.

[gersemi] 13/3/2018 07:58

Yes, but we don't 'act' as a nation. State policy is directed by the government of the day not by a country's people and governments are composed of human beings termed politicians who behave in ways mere mortals simply cannot control nor influence except an on ad hoc basis

[maccamcd] 12/3/2018 20:19

They wouldn't know where Lancashire was to DO you Andy.Sleep well Sir!

[citytilidie] 12/3/2018 19:34

If this is my last ever post then I've been popped off..... And it won't be by the Russians this time

[gersemi] 12/3/2018 18:41

China in Greenland: Mines, Science, and Nods to Independence
By: Miguel Martin

March 12, 2018 06:00 AM Age: 9 hours

-

this is a single paragraph from an article I found just now--



'Greenland has abundant mineral reserves, but low commodity prices and high development costs have hindered development. Only one mine is currently active, and another one is expected to come online in summer of 2018. Four sites in Greenland have attracted serious interest from Chinese companies; two have a realistic chance of coming online in the short term. Once in operation, they would make Chinese SOEs the top foreign investors in Greenland’s natural resources.'

cont..

[gersemi] 12/3/2018 12:34

4 v 2 (20k v 42k)

372k v 285k

skewed to the buy side so a good order book though the caveat is that, as always, it can change in the blink of an eye

'She' (shares are like ships and afforded the female gender) will not sell-off though. I had hoped for a little shake to reduce my average but it just ain't happening

[thebigchap] 12/3/2018 07:02

Fantastic Insight into things Rampair!

And not simply making things up out of thin air feeding the fantasy and telling us all what we want to hear but rather applying logic and picking up on the hidden clues from the presentation video and piecing them together with previous RNS news and the already well established personality of Rod/the company. I agree it would be nice for Rod to tell us exactly why things are being pushed back a bit but if what you are proposing is true then it also makes complete sense why he simply can't. someone posted a good bit earlier this is a marathon and not a sprint..this is how things must and will be done and the exact reason why the Greenland Government trust us to do the job Right!

[snowyflake] 11/3/2018 18:05

Plasybryn in SW; I do not recall you posting at any time during 2018 until today.

Do you in fact have a holding in Bluejay, a company upon which you are ready to comment?

[astralvision] 11/3/2018 15:30

maccamcd You were indeed correct and Rampair has given the licence delays a whole new twist, thanks again Rampair.If anything along those lines does develop it certainly would be very bullish. I await developments and news with keen interest to see what unfolds.

[citytilidie] 11/3/2018 13:28

Correct Macca..Do things slowly, properly and carefully and all the necessary approvals should be a formality, even if they take a couple of months longer than planned. Tick the wrong people off and that's when the wheels start falling off the wagon. From what I have seen/heard Rod and his team are doing everything in the correct manner and in the right order.

[astralvision] 11/3/2018 10:09

Thanks for your post Rampair, that is certainly food for thought, cheers.

[rampair] 11/3/2018 00:16

Two things, Fear is one of those things that comes and goes, it’s natural, particularly if you hold a larger position than normal. This is not a normal opportunity- it is, a simple jigsaw as Mr Macca said.

The second point was that, if a small junior like us were to build the handling port
and infrastructure ourselves we would, in the normal run, borrow/Sell a big piece of the project.
Luckily for us, on the YouTube video, the key word used was “transparent” Also
a lot was made over the relationship between the company and the Greenland Agencies.

What if a bigger company was planning this project? (I’m not suggesting this is the case!) this is an excercise.

If someone like a Glencore wanted to add to their Ilmenite stream they would plan to build a sizeable pier, suitable perhaps for the Panamax that was mentioned? This would need Greenland to perhaps need more time to contemplate a fairly large sized operation straight away.

If we imagine that the company has the interest from offtake, to allow a much more ambitious project to be put in place - one that brought us straight in to the major top few suppliers.

Also mentioned...

Now, a Panamax is a big blighter! Quite a long ship, if you are contemplating a movement involving those ships - we would be straight into the big league, a lot more buildings at the village that exists - now the Greenland planning dept is possibly using Denmark to help out because this project at the 1m ton plus level is going to be something that needs serious planning resources- I would suggest that we should, in fact, be quite pleased we are looking like serious players right off.

I can wait for 2019 for that. The future could be closer than we thought perhaps?

All the above is just guesswork, taken from words spoken that may not have referred to
a big plan, but it makes me wonder.

Anyone wondering what a Panamax looks like, look here: