ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

BMV Bluebird Merchant Ventures Ltd

1.37
0.12 (9.60%)
24 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Bluebird Merchant Ventures Ltd LSE:BMV London Ordinary Share VGG118701058 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.12 9.60% 1.37 1.40 1.45 1.425 1.225 1.25 8,939,739 16:35:07
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Miscellaneous Metal Ores,nec 0 -1.49M -0.0022 -6.45 9.8M
Bluebird Merchant Ventures Ltd is listed in the Miscellaneous Metal Ores sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker BMV. The last closing price for Bluebird Merchant Ventures was 1.25p. Over the last year, Bluebird Merchant Ventures shares have traded in a share price range of 0.475p to 1.425p.

Bluebird Merchant Ventures currently has 689,865,042 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Bluebird Merchant Ventures is £9.80 million. Bluebird Merchant Ventures has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -6.45.

Bluebird Merchant Ventures Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1726 to 1748 of 4575 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  75  74  73  72  71  70  69  68  67  66  65  64  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
18/3/2019
07:14
Looks as though good progress is being made. Very disappointing placing price, but at least the board continue to open their wallets..
the deacon
15/3/2019
17:50
At Kochang I think they are hoping to haul out some previously cut ore to begin with. The biggest initial cost may be the processing plant. I would guess though that there will be unforseen costs along the way. Are people confident of the directors? I have some reservations about Aidan Bishop and Mitchell Tarr who seems to be connected to the controlling Fiske share holding. Patterson and Barclay seem ok.
shieldbug
15/3/2019
08:43
We're absolutely agreed that the cost of running these old mines will be a tiny fraction of developing a greenfield site, and that as a result BMV looks to be amongst the best (if not the best) prospective miners on the LSE. That's a different issue altogether. It doesn't alter the fact that drilling doesn't seem a priority. (I thought from the latest proactive video that the drilling was going to be at lower levels, and hence wasn't going to be connected with immediate production?) Anyway, I've made my point and I won't make it again!
tim000
15/3/2019
08:32
Remember this is reopening a mine and therefore lots of development is already done. I think we will be (pleasantly) surprised when it comes to capex etc but lets see. The drilling is not exploration drilling but rather is all about near term as to what will be mined. They have said first production is the broken rock and what was left behind. Any mining junior will experience dilution but as we are looking at production which is when we transition and generate cash it becomes a different animal. They have discussed debt funding I think . Korea who will probably take a different approach than debt providers in London
cool runnings
15/3/2019
08:26
capex will be relatively VERY INEXPENSIVE.the cost to get these mines back into production is a minuscule fraction for what it would cost to get a new mine into production let alone new mines of this size
tsmith2
15/3/2019
08:16
cr, I said relatively expensive. I'm not a mining engineer, but I imagine the total capex required to reach the production stage will be in the $ millions. If we agree that the company will be valued at multiples of its current mkt cap over the next few years, the last thing shareholders want is further equity dilution now at a low share price when there are already large numbers of warrants, loan conversions, etc in the pipeline. I know you've discussed this before, and you've said that debt finance should be readily available. But at the current mkt cap, that will either be at a high interest rate, and/or come with equity warrants. The 70% grant presumably will be available later as well. Proving up reserves pre-production wouldn't seem a priority, unless bank lenders require it as a condition of debt finance.
tim000
15/3/2019
08:06
The drilling is not exploration drilling but in looking at previous RNSs it is about identifying the continuation of 3 veins for future mining. Plus the South Korean government asked them to apply for a grant covering 70% of the cost. With regards to processing facility why do you think it will be expensive? In the RNSs it mentions that the metallurgical work suggests it will be an inexpensive process for recovering the gold.
cool runnings
15/3/2019
01:29
Largest mine is Muguk, can't be certain they would even want it now, if it became available. Our guys are not youngsters and likely will want a timely exit.

It's possible they may prefer not to do drilling at this point but it might have been counter productive to request to delay the uptake of the KORES offer.

As KORES are funding 70%, assuming they are determining the exact parameters and scope of the drilling, and not Bluebird. In everyone's interest to know the potential depth wise. The grades shouldn't disappoint.

bo doodak
14/3/2019
21:06
Cool runnings may have some insight
tsmith2
14/3/2019
18:27
That makes sense, it's more efficient to concentrate capex (on ore processing, tunnelling, road building, etc)on as few sites as possible, and it's clear that the two mines will be producing for decades. I'm slightly puzzled why they should want to do any underground drilling at this stage (unless it's a condition of the permit to develop); even with the grant, the cost of capital is high at the moment and all available resources should be focussed on starting up production. In relative terms, ie relative to the company's current market cap, the cost of the processing facilities will be quite high.
tim000
14/3/2019
18:21
that's down to having more than enough to crack on with with the two they have. However, there is one other that I know management would be keen to pick up, what used to be the biggest mine in SK. I forget the name; it's been discussed on here before.
tsmith2
14/3/2019
17:51
Interesting implications re feeling now that they may not pursue any more mines.
bo doodak
14/3/2019
13:11
let me have a listen. any good?
tsmith2
13/3/2019
14:59
Yeah sorry. Here you go:Listen to "Bidstack CEO & CTO Plus Mining Analyst John Meyer" https://www.voxmarkets.co.uk?mediaAssetId=5c88f8efd8541e00126aa1cd @VoxMarkets
the deacon
13/3/2019
14:26
Have you link?
tsmith2
13/3/2019
14:01
Digger; there’ll be traders all the way to 20p by September 2021......
highly geared
13/3/2019
13:53
BMV covered by share price Angel on the VOX podcast today, FYI
the deacon
13/3/2019
12:26
This drop doesn't make sense judging by all the info out there and POG rising too.
digger2779
13/3/2019
11:17
POG at $1350/oz at first pour?
tsmith2
13/3/2019
11:00
hxxps://www.uploadlibrary.com/SPAngel_JohnMeyer/Bluebird_Merchant_Ventures_Initiation_2018.pdf

something to revisit

tsmith2
13/3/2019
00:13
Kochang approval around 2nd May... assuming no clarifications required
bo doodak
12/3/2019
22:52
South Korean Gold?
tsmith2
12/3/2019
21:12
tsmith,

Korea Gold.

andy
Chat Pages: Latest  75  74  73  72  71  70  69  68  67  66  65  64  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock