Blinkx Share Discussion Threads

[sikhthetech] 05/5/2016 09:37

thanks 1gw,

[alex1621] 05/5/2016 08:13

Barky bought them all.

[1gw] 05/5/2016 07:56

Euroclear Shares on Loan data.

Another reduction in SOL in April. Shorts nearly gone it would appear.

Jul'15 22.9m shares on loan (average)
Aug'15 20.7m
Sep'15 15.8m
Oct'15 14.1m
Nov'15 12.2m
Dec'15 9.1m
Jan'16 12.8m
Feb'16 14.5m
Mar'16 7.6m
Apr'16 3.4m

[begorrah88] 05/5/2016 06:28

You didn't answer the question football

Well?

[brigadier1] 04/5/2016 23:18

A wog is a wog is a wog. You never know what it might do next.

[geheimnis2] 04/5/2016 17:31

are you buffoons feeling bullish?

I bet you are!

[gowlane] 04/5/2016 17:27

looks like Criteo are eating our lunch!

well they have been winning the ad tech wars for some time now

[sikhthetech] 04/5/2016 10:47

1gw,

and Rubicon set up an Washington office just for the Presidential Election...

[sikhthetech] 04/5/2016 10:01

Beg,
Let alone the other ids like pokerpearson, langster, gadgie etc..

Smooth talkers...
Rinse and spin..

[gowlane] 04/5/2016 09:00

and another thing . . . when Reginelli was appointed to replace Spira, he was not appointed to the Board, even though he had previous Board level experience before joining Blinkx

and he seems to be a mature and level headed individual, an opinion worth listening to you would think

so it begs the question, did he decline a board position because he could see what was happening and feared that it might expose him legally?

when you start with this conspiracy stuff it leads to all kinds of places, so that's enough conspiracy theorizing from me now

at least until Barky is back posting again - Hi there Barky, we know you are out there avidly following every post!

[leluot3] 04/5/2016 08:31

And where did they say the share price would reach 10p?

They didn't? But it will!

[football] 04/5/2016 07:43

more lies from STT and spamming his own thread to hide the question



"Where did R1 say they were expecting to be in the top 10?"

[begorrah88] 04/5/2016 06:55

Well football? have you told her yet?

[sikhthetech] 03/5/2016 23:24

"plus one-off benefits from the Olympics and US Presidential elections - which we estimate at around a tenth of our FY2013 revenue,"


They wouldn't have earned the $20m if it wasn't for the one off events..

[sikhthetech] 03/5/2016 23:19

1gw,

but the extra ads would not be present if those parties don't prepare those 'extra' broadcasts...the 'extra' broadcasts are due to events, in this case the Presidential Election/Olympics...


sites have content and ads.... that's why sites are worried about ad blockers... they pay for the free content...


1gw 3 May'16 - 23:09 - 3177 of 3177 0 0 Moderate | Ban
<...>

there isn't a huge audience looking for party political broadcasts or party ads, but the parties prepare broadcasts and ads to try to influence voters who just switched on to watch the news

[1gw] 03/5/2016 23:09

The revenue came from the political advertisers stt. They (the advertisers) want to reach as many people as they can and have a budget to do so. It isn't people seeking political content, it's ad dollars chasing sites (content) with their target demographics (imo). Think of the uk system: there isn't a huge audience looking for party political broadcasts or party ads, but the parties prepare broadcasts and ads to try to influence voters who just switched on to watch the news, or football, or x-factor...

[sikhthetech] 03/5/2016 22:57

oh dear LCWA...

If people aren't interested in politics then where did the 10%, or $20m extra revenue in fy2013 come from???

Bots!!!!

Take a look at the TU and newsflow...

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 03/5/2016 22:12

1gw - 03 May 2016 - 13:05 - 3165 of 3174 - 1STT - but why? Does your preferred TV channel / magazine / newspaper get more interesting and relevant in a General Election year? The content for most outlets will stay the same, but for some (e.g. newspaper broadsheets) it will have a lot more political content - which for a relatively small part of the population will be interesting and relevant but for (I would guess) a large part of the population will be boring and irrelevant.On Quantcast reach, I think R1 is doing fine. The 30-day running total has been fairly steady at around 190m +/- 5m US monthly people since mid-March. In my book that is operating at scale in terms of reach. What they now need to do is convert that reach into ad spend. The recent dramatic rise in page views may be a good pointer in that direction, or it may be a meaningless reporting change - difficult to say for sure so we'll have to wait for the results and hope for a steer on current trading.Where did R1 say they were expecting to be in the top 10? I know they have reported being at a certain rank but I don't remember seeing them state an expectation.-----They didn't. The chap the runs this forum is a wee bit dodgy.

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 03/5/2016 22:09

sikhthetech - 03 May 2016 - 09:44 - 3160 of 3173 - 01gw, The US Presidential Election campaign is naturally across entire US (and beyond)....therefore, I would expect 'reach' to increase...The same goes for the Superbowl...Likewise, with the Olympics, being an international event...I would expect quantcast for 1R to increase..am I missing something?-----A conscience?

[lance corporal winstanley ash] 03/5/2016 22:07

Take Euro in/out vote... how many have already checked out sites offering opinions - a lot probably have but the ones on the fence???... I expect visitors to these sites to increase as we get nearer to the Euro in/out vote...-----What sites?