Bidstack Share Discussion Threads

[kemche] 19/6/2020 10:14

They may be able to buy at an even cheaper price but with the award of the Gold Standard certification I suspect the chances will be few and far between.

[botmzup] 19/6/2020 10:04

The day after the proposed placing was announced, ie 5th June, there was 82 million shares traded, when the daily average volume at the time was 2.5m...which was also multiples of any previous days traded volume in Bids listed history.
Are some people suggesting that there was no forward selling on that day? It was relentless `buying` from bell to bell, 95% blue, and even though I think they were a steal for private investors in the open market that day surely they couldn`t have all been PI`s buying. Any more informed poster(s) that wish to educate on the subject will be welcome.
Incidentally the chance to buy at 4.3p that day is under 10% of the placing price, so anybody bellyaching about being cut out of the deal should put their dummy back in and find something else to whinge about. You can still buy as I write at 4.3, and if all goes to plan with a few good RNS`s the share price could be well in to double figures in a few months time...are you really going to moan about the missed 0.3p?

[chrissmith2] 19/6/2020 09:55

hi niggle. not allowed on bidlievers but yes i was part of the placing.

[kemche] 19/6/2020 09:53

I will come clean and admit I am TW. But not bloody Spartacus. He's an impostor! GRRR!!!

[aidenabettin] 19/6/2020 09:44

Yeah you've had it good for a long time and dont like it when challenged. How many accounts have you opened in 21yrs?.How much illegal shareprice manipulation has gone on unchallenged and is continuing..No FCA or AIM regulators ever had a look to see what's going on even though TW informs them on a regular basis. All part of a corrupt city of london. Rules apply to some but not others who work for the establishment

[andy] 19/6/2020 09:38

aiden,


I wonder when ADVFN started?

[kemche] 19/6/2020 09:34

Everyone here is TW - except for Aiden.

[aidenabettin] 19/6/2020 09:25

Other way round

[aidenabettin] 19/6/2020 09:24

Andy joined 2nd Dec 1999.Niggle joined 3rd Dec 1999.Who are the AIM twins that are never far apart?

[andy] 19/6/2020 09:19

Aiden,

Re post #26932


I don't know where to start!

I don't have a "mob", I post as an individual, and always will do.

More senior staff employed equates to more G & A expenses, hence the need to place, as predicted, because the accounts clearly show the burn rate, and since they were published, new people have been added to the team, and they don't come cheap.

I'm not surprised JD didn't participate in the placing, he's already sold at much higher prices and still holds a substantial tranche, he's already taken advantage to secure himself financially by cashing some out at a much higher price, and now enjoys being paid a decent salary......


If "they" wanted to remove him, they could in a flash, the city always wins. I know a company that went on a roadshow a few years ago, and the institutions they visited told them in no uncertain terms that they would not put any more money in with the current CEO in charge, and he stepped down immediately, as his company were out of money.

Once he had resigned, the placing was undertaken successfully.

JD could step down tomorrow and remain in some advisory capacity, to retain income, if he was under pressure, but he clearly isn't otherwise his leaving would have been a condition of the placing, IMO of course.

[niggle] 19/6/2020 09:10

Can some of the insiders on the Bidliever board tell us if they were invited to join the placing please?

It is not unusual for those investors closest to the company to be invited to subscribe.

The likes of Countdracula, Globalnomad & Moneygenxyz have gone very quiet.

Maybe they subscribed at 4p and made money from us idiots stagging a few?

[andy] 18/6/2020 23:59

Aiden,


If you check the accounts they most certainly DID need to place, they were clearly out of funds as per their burn rate, and sure enough they placed right on when people expected they would run out of money.


The reason for the lack of TR!'s is, IMO, because institutions snapped up the shares and sold them on to their retail investor clients, hence no need to declare.

[chrissmith2] 18/6/2020 21:47

cobblers. not good. lot to do now.

[chrissmith2] 18/6/2020 21:40

well that is interesting aiden.
bids did not need funds iyo!
just establishment diluting jd!
i am convinced, clearly

[aidenabettin] 18/6/2020 20:35

Not gone down too well. hTTps://twitter.com/gemisisDev/status/1273342554449129472?s=19

[aidenabettin] 18/6/2020 20:24

The gloves are off. hTTps://twitter.com/upto2m/status/1273685466563383296?s=19

[aidenabettin] 18/6/2020 18:41

Who cares about who wanted the shares. The placing was not required imo for financial reasons but to simply dilute JD 's holdings. Now we have 100% manipulation of the shareprice and stalling for some reason that at some point will become apparent why. Only one TR-1 with a 58% increase of issued stock. Still time for more TR-1's which would probably be from individuals and not institutions. It would look bad if an institution delayed reporting 3% or above but nobody bothers when it's a HNWI trading through some made up investment shell with one person registered. Some have opened as many as 140 within a couple of months.

[chrissmith2] 18/6/2020 18:21

not sure what you are trying to say aiden?
yes, placing was oversubscribed at 4p BUT
it was a tender offer and it was undersubscribed at 4.5p the next price point
demand was absolutely there at 4p but large rump of that was IPO traders
just imagine if IPO traders had not subscribed as 4p was the lowest level and ONLY level where stock could be fully placed
the fact that the share price has held above 4p is very positive imo

[aidenabettin] 18/6/2020 18:01

Sorry cant BUY that.Recent placing oversubscribed and had to be scaled back.Demand was obviously there but they didnt want further investment.Why?

[chrissmith2] 18/6/2020 17:33

stifel were on the bid on both seaq and rsp at the close aiden. hardly holding it down imo!
there may be further tr-1's, but i doubt it.
very few asset managers or institutional investors buy into aim companies sub £20m not because they don't like the company, but simply cannot buy in the size they need to make it worthwhile.

[aidenabettin] 18/6/2020 16:12

With no TR-1's it may well be that Stifel are to BIDS what Spreadex are to TSI.Complete shareprice manipulation