Berkeley Technology Share Discussion Threads

[petersmith6] 16/11/2004 19:12

back to 2P

[seabird] 16/11/2004 17:10

Are we going down for one last time? Share certificates soon to be wall paper?

[hugepants] 09/11/2004 11:05

Checked back previous posts. Treuger owns 34.5%

[cmillar] 09/11/2004 09:22

Have to say that I though A Treuger owned more than 30% - Gyllenhammer owns 3.15m and Aviation (Adam Pelled + Co) own 3.18m.

So thats 11.1m (17%) + whatever Treuge owns (and the rest of the board)

[hugepants] 09/11/2004 09:16

thanks. Dont have the AR handy but there is one guy (the founder?) who owns around 30,% so he basically controls things just now. He may have some competition in the future though if the value hunters keep mopping up shares.

[cmillar] 09/11/2004 08:20

Agreed - holding was 2.332 reported on 15/10/03.

Does anyone have a list of major shareholders - seems to me that pretty soon there will be minimal amounts in the hands of small shareholders....

[cjatt0001] 08/11/2004 14:47

Thats about double the initial holding reported back in Qtr 4 2003. See SEC Filings for details.

[hugepants] 08/11/2004 11:28

Change in shareholding



Can someone tell me whether this lot have bought or sold (I have an AR but not where I am at the moment). As an aside why cant the compnay themselves let us know this information?

[rambutan2] 03/11/2004 14:02

note that aviation popped up in ava yesterday.

[holdontight] 02/11/2004 22:33

They (Management) sold PKTR at LOWS !! Today's trading largely irrelevant, though poss Apelled reducing exposure.
What do BEK now offer ?

[philut] 02/11/2004 20:42

Not so sure they were sells - look like rollovers with slight difference in price the m/m's turn.

[holdontight] 02/11/2004 20:23

Interesting. Yet again the Management demonstrate their ability to sell at "lows" ! My goodness, do they need some sort of consultancy themselves !! Without sounding silly, Adam Pelled could certainly help develop this weakness.
As the liklihood is that Adam sold a portion of his holdings on "good news", this is saddly even less likely !!
$ headed to hell and BEK share price with it, no doubt !!

[cmillar] 02/11/2004 14:06

Results out - Having sold PKTR most of the risk in value has been removed - shareholder value approx 20p per share and most of that is cash or cash equivalent (albeit some tied up in LPAL which ceased writing policies in July 02 - The majority of policies will be paid in the next 18-24 months.

I note that the trades today were for 600k x 2, 900k x2 and 1.8m - From memory 600k and 900k were the size of stakes held by Apelled and relation in various accounts.....

[cjatt0001] 02/11/2004 13:12

Whats up ! More volume in 1 day than nearly a year!

[cmillar] 02/11/2004 13:03

Geez - 4,800,000 shares traded.....

[gemini99] 02/11/2004 12:30

3Q results out. PKTR stake sold. I make it:

M/cap = 6.5M
NTAV = 13M
Cash = 10M
Net cash 11.5M

[responsible lad] 23/9/2004 20:34

Remember that this share was once just 1.75p as London Pacific Group. Nearly every share re-visits their lowest again and I am sure this one will too. GET OUT WHILE YOU CAN, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED !!!!!!!!!!!

[petersmith6] 23/9/2004 20:26

2p here we come!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[holdontight] 13/9/2004 13:15

He's some way off there, unless he wants to stick in at least another £700k.

[stewjames] 09/9/2004 13:31

Because the share is trading well below NAV. There is potential value here, especially if you can build enough of a stake to have some sway with the management.

[seabird] 09/9/2004 13:23

Why has the Pelled family gone in for some £300k?

[holdontight] 31/8/2004 21:43

Oh dear...Oh dear...Oh dear !!!!!!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahah !!!!!!
Adam, what a waste of money....but there again - you can afford it !!!!!!!

[rambutan2] 20/8/2004 11:44

that said, the share price hasnt budged over recent months.
any thoughts on why not?
as always, i suspect that theres more to this co than meets the eye.
what a puzzler.
in fact i expect i will still be puzzling over it when it finally goes bust...