Batm Advanced Communicat... Share Discussion Threads

[echoridge] 25/5/2022 22:00

ok genius, here's the thing about that one: the transaction in question occurred before I got involved with BATM, and so I never read the original RNS. Instead I pulled the numbers off a news story from a general search, which in fact was a bit misleading. At the time, I posted a quick comment about the imputed value of Ador and included a health warning that it didn't seem right. The second time was the post you're referring to and I stupidly repeated that valuation, which you so graciously pointed out was wrong at the time. When you did, I immediately admitted my boneheaded mistake, which of course you remember well. Classy indeed.

[kooba] 25/5/2022 21:57

Bonne nuit tout le monde.

[echoridge] 25/5/2022 21:44

one thing's for absolute certain. You are definitely not used to being challenged especially when you post rubbish you're convinced is genius..

[kooba] 25/5/2022 21:40

Stay classy.

[kooba] 25/5/2022 21:37

This is gold btw'...suffice to say I don't get involved in anything where I can't speak fluently from an experienced institutional investor perspective.'

[kooba] 25/5/2022 21:32

Haha ha...punching down indeed ..I doubt there's any investor you could punch down on..you are serially wrong ..wrong wrong wrong totally clueless and wrapped up in your own version of the situation without entertaining anything but a Goldilocks scenario ..the combination of blind belief in your holdings with limited ability to step back and question is very dangerous ..your description of yourself also exposes everything you are not.Now throughly bored of this and will leave you to rant on about how good you are with zero evidence in any shape or form on your own.I'm sure you believe your on BS.

[kooba] 25/5/2022 21:26

"can't speak fluently from an experienced institutional investor perspective."Please run me over your Ador valuation again oh fluent one..huge schoolboy error wouldn't let you near any funds..even your own.

[echoridge] 25/5/2022 21:24

Its true: you're insufferable. I'm sorry, fse. I don't like punching down anyway

[kooba] 25/5/2022 21:20

Self awareness is not strong with this one..sheer comedy.

[kooba] 25/5/2022 21:19

My bag , I simply don't suffer fools always been my failing. Agree let's be constructive always my intent and always explained..point about shareholders not wanting to hear..well made indeed. I quite frankly hope my hypothesis is wrong ..I am a shareholder. But I think one should be able to put forward possibilities backed by previous form without being shot down because it doesn't suit someone's agenda. I think self awareness of some really needs some work too btw.You FSE do seem to at least listen to possibilities and it seems sense something is not quite right..blindly backing a company and not asking questions just because you own them isn't clever ..it's foolish. We agree that in the circumstances some clarity from the company on the buy back ..and even share price , there are bigger falls this year in the tech world but mostly because things have come unstuck ( Netflix) but still on the back of positive updates and optimistic forward looking statements on all fronts the current performance doesn't make much sense.

[echoridge] 25/5/2022 21:18

simple private investor?? wow, nice try. you almost got me annoyed enough to return fire. suffice to say I don't get involved in anything where I can't speak fluently from an experienced institutional investor perspective. That's why I would never have suggested anything as naive and simplistic as what you have.

[fse] 25/5/2022 21:07

May the untoward comments be pitched into a bottomless hole and the remaining ones be forced to eat rotten eggs and green cheese and smile whilst they read the awful truths.

[the crypt] 25/5/2022 21:03

And what my posts - come on FSE

[echoridge] 25/5/2022 20:35

No. It cannot. And you weren't 'fully aware' of the shareholder structure, otherwise you never would have suggested it in the first place. The idea is completely D.O.A. if you understand absolutely anything about UK long-only asset managers generally, LO specifically, Zvi's specific interests in remaining listed, the state of the capital markets, the sp's massive discount to a sum-of-the-parts relative to where a deal would need to get done, etc etc etc. Man, you really really really don't like being wrong and having it pointed out, do you?

[kooba] 25/5/2022 20:21

It could happen ..absolutely no reason why not..fully awhere of shareholder structure thanks. Does not prevent anything as far as i am concerned.Now let's run those Ador numbers of yours again where you were out by a multiple of 10 fold ...just $600m between friends hey..and tell me how clever you are. Twerp.

[echoridge] 25/5/2022 20:15

It comes down to this: you offered an idea that can never and will never happen. I tried to tell you that politely, but your ego doesn't permit such a thing so you have tried to dodge, mock, slur, and deflect your way out of it instead of just admitting you didn't have any idea what you were talking about. simple enough?

[kooba] 25/5/2022 20:14

I bet you do...nurse medication bed 2 he's gone delirious again. I guess we will have to let it play out..so far since I've been on here you have been serially wrong on just about everything ..let's see if you can keep you run up.

[kooba] 25/5/2022 20:11

Echochamber I have no bloody idea what you are asking , it's just random BS showing you have know idea what I am talking about. If you cant keep up..shut up. Chin chin.

[echoridge] 25/5/2022 20:11

I've had nano a lot lower than that thx. And you still won't admit that you proffered an impossible scenario and now you want to try and cover it up with false bravado and dopey comments. Wont work

[kooba] 25/5/2022 20:09

Yes i am a shareholder in Nanoco got in at about 20p earlier this year as it goes if you want to look back.think it looks interesting..but let's not digress , you seem to be unable to think through one stock ..let's not complicate things further for you.