Ariana Resources Share Discussion Threads

[charles clore] 27/10/2024 12:51

ACT - Ì would rather put my money on Ariana than kefi anyday

[xow98] 27/10/2024 10:59

Metals & Mining Tracker
@MetalsMiningT
Weekly UK Metals & Mining Movers

[xow98] 27/10/2024 10:58

Ariana – Shares Rising As ASX Listing Nears but far more to come

AIM-listed Ariana Resources (AAU) saw its shares rise a stonking 32.5% last week. It’s a very big rise, especially for Ariana. As its ASX listing draws ever closer, I wonder why.

Subscribe to ShareProphets to access Premium Content

[arlington chetwynd talbott] 27/10/2024 08:58

If you look at the way ShareProphets have been plugging KEFI and AAU for years and what that has translated into for PIs following their advice, you must see that you cannot be cynical enough about AIM gold juniors. AAU may now have finally turned and KEFI may be about to turn, but will those folk ever break even on them? They would have been so much better off in physical gold. AIM gold juniors really are the dodgy end of investing.

[charles clore] 27/10/2024 08:39

I note sentiment definitely turning for AAU. Not before time, either. Perhaps there is still time to own a Porsche 911 before I die. Driving it might be another issue though haha

[soulsauce] 27/10/2024 07:43

So probably 5yrs then as many of us were saying and that is without any hitches.
Critical they get the EIA to avoid another Tavsan type delay.

But maybe, as already stated earlier in the week, it won't get that far if bought out.

[plasybryn] 27/10/2024 07:24

In the body of the article there is a bit more detail on the timing. Bit more realistic timing.Discussing the path to an eventual investment decision, Sener says that the next step will be a further revision of the PFS as an interim step ahead of commencing a Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS). In parallel, Ariana will work on an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) before moving on to permitting and financing. The company is also planning an ASX listing to complement its London listing."We envisage completing the DFS in 18 to 24 months," he says. "If that's positive and we green light the project, then – based on our Turkish experience – we would anticipate a two-year build time. We have a very busy work programme ahead and are looking forward to taking what we believe is the biggest undeveloped gold deposit in Zimbabwe into production."

[plasybryn] 27/10/2024 07:11

Mining Review Africa - KS On LinkedinExtract - note "coming months"Ariana Resources: Dokwe on a clear pathway to production The Dokwe gold project in Zimbabwe is shaping up to be a considerable mine by Zimbabwean standards. DR KERIM SENER, MD and founder of Ariana Resources, tells ARTHUR TASSELL that there is a clear pathway for the project to be developed into a 75 000 to 100 000 ounces a year, open-pit operation with a mine life of between 10 and 15 years. He says the company will launch a full feasibility study on the project within the coming months.

[kaos3] 27/10/2024 06:00

ot

1. putinaire is a blessing ... he posts there, where i find value
2. i do not invest any more eg add in a juniors, despite value until the feb 2025 - due to geopolitical
3. interesting that the bet buying pure metal and then recycle it back into miners is proving right
4. i am having miniscule stakes in several small value miners ,,,, so i can recite them in the middle of the night to strike when the time comes to sell the metal for shares - including aau
5. i find investing into natural resources companies which are profitable of PE up to 5 atm with huge cash reserves most deserving. why - because they are able, cheap, dividend paying and above all - they are most able to put surplus cash to work when ,not if, the crisis strikes - much better then myself

AAU - for me the jury is still out ... superb value, that is for sure. but lol - capital increase risk?, cheap buy out, BOD structure, non being able to guide their own cash flow from the only producing mine, doing their geo work for almost free (paid in shares sometimes, but their revenue is almost zero - how responsible is that?) and all the rest

but it could become a huge success imho. depending how determined the big shareholders will act. without them taking position - it will be more of the same. i am being slightly negative regarding the presend situation as you know already (i did shut up) - but most importantly - the new biggest shareholder is an unknown to me - so i am waiting and observing.

if i would be a big shareholder - i would orginise a drinking or cigar meeting of a few big ticket boys - and try to determine the disciplined future for the AAU. Showing the present structure THERE IS SOMEONE THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE TO EVERY DAY.

if boys would not come - that would be a telling sign

hint hint

but luckily i am just a poor jester slovenian gardener

all imho stoopid opinion

i hope this post will not trigger anyone - because it is just delusional

[zangdook] 27/10/2024 01:20

It's google translate, but what was the original language?

[shortarm] 26/10/2024 15:06

Don't worry, Lotts will ban him soon :-D

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 12:59

And its a cert on prices. This is a decent enough cap where you dont have to plan for a call to NOMAD to rely a message to maker to walk it up or down 50% because the boss wants to buy or sell pre a release

Reliable on any decent cap

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 12:51

Good for investor adjustment's though, re buy sell add reduce - depending on market. Not just for traders

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 12:50

In the old days, you only needed primary fundamental boxes to translate institutions. But they trade so much these days, secondary's are as important really

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 12:48

I know you lot would want EPS forwards etc translated to share price prices, but not needed here anyway

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 12:43

Lets have a bit of fun. The prices shown here are wholly fundamentally driven and will be a fundamental ponder for those fundamentally there lol

Ive left tech prices off

Now, i can assure a touch or stab of one of those prices/zones, is a minimum 50%sell off. That sell off does not mean it's gone whollly negative. It just means why fkn bother holding it as it does it, when can buy cheaper.

So, here is the thing

i already know which price it will occur at post the combo fundamental/price analysis

Anyone?

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 12:31

But tbf, i dont see the point in me knowing where any spiking would land, and not telling others where to find it. Shall do a proper chart next week so you can gauge for yourselves.

Dont be so negative on the chart coming. It is literally all fundamental views in a box. In real time

[charles clore] 26/10/2024 12:15

Someone is getting desperate lol

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 12:12

If your nice, il show you the zones to monitor above the primary zone, for sellers

But i suspect this will not want to be seen at all lol

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 12:10

So lets all hope for the 1st quarter in 10, it can actually remain positive at this zone/phase.

Long quarter ahead but tbf, this one so far, is different to the others that failed...so far on how its breaking the zone

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 12:05

I could literally buy this much higher, and still be beating longer term holders with ease, due to their costs

Esp if they averaged down and added to costs

i dont get the drama of not supporting a stock until do, really

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 12:02

Now i support it, having avoided the extortionate costs prior,. Whats the problem?

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 12:01

These costs of holdings deserve negativity from a PI stance, in a period of remaining true..

Given we are the only ones, literally, from all market participants, paying the costs. Nobody else is

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 11:59

So for sure....without a reason to support it for 16 quarters, well, rightful disdain for it in that period really, no? We are talking about a period of 67% drop, which is now recovered to a 50% drop. Over 16 quarters thats a lot of time and inflation dead cap.

If unfortunate enough to be in too early, its anything from 100% to 211% more required to see the previous highs.

Plus 5 years of inflation cost =, per £100,000 , a cost of £24000 in cash vested value



So per £100,000 now has a current - capital plus £24000 to recoup. Or if in more recently, a cash value affect ranging 3700 to 16000

Why would you not be negative when you know the maths involved during any instrument phase?

[putinaire] 26/10/2024 11:52

So i can only assume those supporting it pre the current quarter are hurting

Old adage

There is a time to , and a time not to