We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Angus Energy Plc | LSE:ANGS | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BYWKC989 | ORD GBP0.002 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 08:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs | 28.21M | 117.81M | 0.0325 | 0.14 | 16.3M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
08/7/2021 14:15 | hits - so you are saying the board said cost would be possible within £2.5 million and you say "board got that wrong by the pifflingly small matter of £12 million of cost " so you are suggesting total cost of "reconnection at commercial rates" is £ 14.5 million ? yes ? no trap , just interested how you get that figure ... | sincero1 | |
08/7/2021 13:51 | Couple of teeny point-ettes. Sincero is fond of pointing out (but I'm not sure why, exactly) that "truth is the best defence against libel. That's a fact... it is. However, since rmart is keen to copy n paste the answer given by ANGS to the libel question its Investor Questions, where they attempt to blame all previous woes on past management I thought I'd state the following categorically true and very easily verifiable fact. The extract below is taken word for word from an RNS released by the superduper, shiny and new ANGS executive board, with reference to Saltfleetby:- "At this stage the Directors are confident that reconnection at commercial rates is possible within the £2.5 million budget and advised timescale of completing work between May and August 2020." So, the the superduper, shiny and new ANGS executive board got that wrong by the pifflingly small matter of £12 million of cost and a year and a half of time... well done, George and crew. Stellar performance. Incredible accuracy. Separately, Sincero, yes I am absolutely more than happy to be out at the level I got out at, thanks. | headinthesand | |
08/7/2021 12:59 | complete melt down ... wow .... tragic... | sincero1 | |
08/7/2021 12:55 | So, Mr. Shill, what’s the latest on the legal case with the party who thinks Anguish owes him money? Who is that, by the way? How much is in dispute? When can we expect an update? | jtidsbadly | |
08/7/2021 12:55 | rmart - i actually think he is a local resident...all his posting history and hissy fits suggest it. I get it i'd be annoyed too.. he is in melt down today ... | sincero1 | |
08/7/2021 12:54 | Does this constitute the whole of your investment case for recommending this horlicks? Not very persuasive, is it? Not even the biggest mug among mug punters can be falling for any of this guff, what? I mean to say. | jtidsbadly | |
08/7/2021 12:52 | jtisadly - you really need to calm down.... " They deferred payment on some of their bills to avoid it falling any further" .... remember they are watching | sincero1 | |
08/7/2021 12:43 | JTidsbadly - a sad, bitter and twisted individual. | rmart | |
08/7/2021 12:42 | The shills seem to have gone off for further instructions. | jtidsbadly | |
08/7/2021 12:28 | £500,000 is 2 months worth of working capital. They deferred payment on some of their bills to avoid it falling any further. We haven’t heard any more about the legal case someone had begun for (was it?) non-payment, what? We were, as usual, pretty accurate in our analysis. Anything to offer, you shills? I see your chums (or is it you?) are pumping away fit to bust on the other site. Poor old mug punters. Or cannon fodder, as you probably refer to them in your ZOOM ramp updates. | jtidsbadly | |
08/7/2021 12:16 | hits "I take it you don't agree that I picked a sensible exit point? " i guess the question now is do you ? | sincero1 | |
08/7/2021 11:42 | with fireworks its normally 10 metres but the way old jtisadly is fizzy today best all move back at least 25. | sincero1 | |
08/7/2021 11:33 | oh dear, another tick up, take it easy, dont combust. | rmart | |
08/7/2021 11:25 | its funny to see though. | rmart | |
08/7/2021 11:24 | i think jtisadly is going to explode... everyone stand back .... | sincero1 | |
08/7/2021 11:23 | Target 1.6p fo Zak by end August, IMO we could see that this month. | rmart | |
08/7/2021 11:23 | The entire team has not been replaced, that’s pure rubbish. Carlos is still there, so is Hollis. Their jobs are unchanged, only their titles are different. Jonathan is still there, somewhere, too, though what his job description says is anyone’s guess. If the Board of Angus thinks the suggestion that they misled investors last year is libellous, kindly suggest to them that bring on libel proceedings. | jtidsbadly | |
08/7/2021 11:21 | jtisadly - remember breath in for 4 , out for 4 .. you seem very very very annoyed today... " they did run out of money towards the end of March, as we predicted" You are doing it again the interims showed "As at 31 March 2021 the Group had cash of £591,000. As at 31 March 2021 the Group had net current assets of £1,351,000". Lets not forget these others of yours .. its a horrendously embarrassing list of predictions: tisadly 5.7.21 "placing this week or next" 21.5.21 "poor angus 0.20 soon" 6 weeks ago. " share price into the sixties shortly " 4 weeks ago. "oga approval doubt" . " financing doubt" . " running out of money " weekly prediction for last 6 months. " 0.15 by end of year". " placing soon " daily prediction for last 6 months. | sincero1 | |
08/7/2021 11:10 | What is the company doing or going to do about libellous posts regarding the company being posted in online forums? Asked on 13 June 2021 Since 2019 the entire executive Board has been replaced, there is a new Director of Operations, a new Asset Manager across the Fields, a new Planning Officer, HSE Advisor, and EA Liaison officer. The entire technical team, bar one, is new. Additionally we have moved from the disappointments and exuberances of the Weald oil story into a more diverse transition company focusing on conventional and overlooked oil recoveries from legacy assets, gas supply via National Grid to offtakers such as Shell and geothermal projects in the south-west. Nonetheless there is a group, clearly acting in concert, who continue to hold the company responsible for null results on drilling operations that either were completed or intiated before 2019, or planning issues, as at Balcombe, which were left in a poor state for the present Board to resolve. The amount of time spent by this group on the share boards, given they freely admit that they are not shareholders, is surprising and we can only presume that they are either professional share board (de)rampers or retirees. Judge of them as you will, but there is no law against misrepresenting information. We do monitor the Boards for gross libel otherwise continue to support freedom of expression and hope that these individuals, whether in their twilight years or not, find some more useful and rewarding outlet for their energies elsewhere on the AIM, ideally where they do have a financial interest. | rmart | |
08/7/2021 11:09 | Not expecting a placing soon, then? And it’s no good making these claims about making things up. We got all the most recent placings right to within two weeks and they did run out of money towards the end of March, as we predicted, and had to delay payments, which we suggested as their only alternative to a placing at the time. You should go back to your masters and suggest they desist in making false and unpleasant claims about posters here. They wouldn’t like exposure of the misleading of shareholders re the financial position last year to a wider public, what? Or public questions as to the nature of the hedges? Or the need for yet more money? Or what’s going on re the sidetrack? Or where are the accounts for AEWB3, or for their Poundland partner company or its parent? I shall look forward to the wording of their answer to the recent question on the Q&A. The current pump and dump appears to be aimed at allowing the lenders to get out at a small profit, and, if possible, to get some of the warrants exercised. If they don’t succeed in getting the price up enough to do this, are you really, seriously, suggesting they don’t need a placing? No idea? Haven’t got a clue? Cat got your tongue? | jtidsbadly | |
08/7/2021 10:37 | could the resident window lickers constant spectacularly inaccurate predictions and fabrication and the recent Angus q&a slap down actually be fuelling and supporting a share price increase .... | sincero1 | |
08/7/2021 10:27 | full ask getting hammered now and just gone NT only under 50k .1.1 to buy, still cheap as chips. | rmart | |
08/7/2021 10:20 | uclot ""PUMP" in full flow I see... so the "DUMP" coming along by the weekend I expect." you really don't think before you write do you... another humiliation for you is just over 24 hours away | sincero1 | |
08/7/2021 10:17 | Nice steady rise going on here. If we can finish today on 1.1+ I will be happy. Nice and steady to 5p, no speeding tickets. Just feed the news out nice and slow but regular and we will get there by gas tap turn on. Isnt it lovely to see? | rmart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions