Patt does not understand how speculative plays with limited revenue but significant potential should be valued - I did explain this to him on the Apta thread, but he simply does not get it.
yasX 14 Dec '24 - 17:03 - 5650 of 5882 Edit
It is a lie - just like that ambulance driver lied when fleecing those organisations.
They confirmed orders of 1.8M which were anticipated to complete but some did not for reasons the Co. provided.
As already explained, valuing this on current financials is akin to arguing that a non revenue biotech with a dozen products in phase 3 should be valued at nil because it has no current income.
Drive your ambulance and buy an index linked tracker - leave actual investment selection to those of us who know what they are doing. |
From Hamlet
“There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.”
And if you are going to quote Hamlet to a Shakespeare aficionado, then please quote correctly. It should be.. 'The lady doth protest too much, methinks” |
A certain poster brings to mind a line from Hamlet, "Methinks the lady doth protest too much". A large number of repetitive negative posts about Angle.
A tad worried perhaps. |
Yes. It’s growing. It rose from £2.2m in 2023 to £2.9m in 2024. However, if it is £3.6m in 2025 then the share price is 0p.
Given that AN delivered 42% of the 2024 revenue that he RNS forecast in June 24 no forecasts can be really believed.
Yes….£2.9m is almost zero. Really! |
I also found PATT on LSE posting under Abouttime
Seems to think STX will soon be debt free and reach 15p
Maybe he should have bought Angle when it was 50% discount to the 15p placing
LOL
sent from my iPhone |
Where is sicilian_kan ??
Last seen here 30th Dec talking about Angle in a negative light
You know that's not allowed
Now stop being stingy and pay for a premium account so you can start banning some of these trolls
Start with the lowest of the low scum worst offenders bones and PRATT
sent from my iPhone |
Trading update 1/25 “Revenues for the year ended 31 December 2024 are expected to be up 31% at £2.9 million (FY23: £2.2 million).”
26/9/24 RNS “Despite the recent unexpected constraints on product sales, revenues for H2 are expected to double compared to H1 with the full year revenue expected to be between £3.0 million and £3.7 million, materially lower than previously anticipated”
5/6/24 RNS “Current consensus revenue is £6.45m for FY24. (Source: Bloomberg)”
So revenues went from £6.45m in June 24 for the year to £2.9m end revenues. Really people should be wound up by AN completely misleading them. How on earth can he only deliver 42% of the revenue forecast in June? Revenues of £2.9m with a 60% gross margin mean contribution of just £1.6m with costs of £14m. So almost zero.
My point is that you cannot trust a word he writes. And he wrote the RNSs.
Don’t shoot the messenger. |
I suspect the next couple of updates from Angle will be huge
And the trolls will be forced to stop posting here for fear of shame
sent from my iPhone |
Ignore PATT he's a bitter ex holder who keeps losing money
He's not happy that we are up over 100% in 3 months
Meanwhile he's buying STX and it's going nowhere
His sidekick nigel that follows his every move must be doing badly as well
sent from my iPhone |
With revenues almost zero and costs at £7m a half unless they sign a really material contract pronto there is zero future revenues to leverage a new non diluting raise of any kind.
This is potentially what winds people up. The revenues aren't almost zero! Stick to the facts please. |
I really don't care whether you are a convicted fraudster or a genuine investor but your continual ramblings about a raise are to say the least tiresome. Yes you may be right that they will need more cash but if the positioning of the raise is to ramp up growth in sales etc then many shareholders will be happy to be diluted if the bigger picture down the road is expotential growth.
May I suggest you read the RNS again. It appears to me that AGL have many fingers in pies with very large Pharma's. It is also appears to me that they are at a tipping point.
I cannot remember for certain but I seem to recall Newland talking about 2026 and being cash positive. Laying the foundations this year for the growth to achieve it seems to be on track. |
Apologies. When I said cash raise I meant a placing. Which is one form of cash raise! For interest, how can they avoid a further dilution? With revenues almost zero and costs at £7m a half unless they sign a really material contract pronto there is zero future revenues to leverage a new non diluting raise of any kind.
Certainly no debt is possible, a rights issue very unlikely, and a placing the only answer. Just my view mind. Always happy to hear other solutions. |
That's not quite what you've done actually. You've claimed a placing is in the offing without any knowledge of that.
Although I agree with you on the cash position and the lowlifes there's a chance they can avoid further dilution. It's not a certainty. |
All I do is post a view that the cash position means that a cash raise is in the offing. And explain exactly why. Which is perfectly fair. This results in endless AGL trolls making ridiculous attacks on me for stating a view.
This is actually the biggest red flag here. The fact that the rampers are so willing to be utterly disgraceful but not actually give any argument as to why AGL does not need to raise cash.
Happily I am utterly immune to any attacks and they just make me more determined to put forward my view. So attack away you disgusting lowlifes.
Now, again, with £10m cash at 31/12/24 snd with AGL never letting cash to drop below £9m before, why would a cash raise by placing not being presold right now on these rather enthusiastic RNSs? |
If you look on the profile for purchaseatthetop it says he’s from Gerrards Cross and is in his 50’s
He has mentioned before that he’s an ambulance driver
It just so happens there is a man in his 50’s based in Gerrards Cross who is an ambulance driver that was convicted and imprisoned for embezzling money from a charity
It also says in his profile that he’s a business man
If you look up Richard David Bobath on companies house you can see he holds past and present directorships
It looks like he’s in the business of losing money because accounts show losses going back a few years and the company is about to be struck off for failing to submit overdue accounts
This is the same man coming on here to tell us a placing is coming. You can’t make it up
sent from my iPhone |
Proven worthless .. Just like you has a human being A stain on the Earth. You won’t be posting on Advfn soon with such vigour Money laundering in Italy is custodial. Making out your family members bought it won’t wash Like it did with the UK judiciary. Quote You fluttered it away, when all along you was purchasing property in Italy. This in its self is contempt of court. You will learn not to mess about with people who have far far deeper pockets than you. |
iturama1
Exactly. |
Actually thiopia you have simply shown that you don’t have me filtered. If you had then any post of mine simply does not appear on your board. So you doctored that to pretend you filtered me.
“The cash position of the Company remains solid, and stronger than market expectations with cash balances of £10.4 million at 31 December 2024”
Of course they are about to raise cash. The seminar is about long term possible work that Illumina have presented about before. It is nothing new. I have no short snd never will. AN always raises cash. If the RNS was indeed so important to Illumina, don’t you think they might have been included on the RNS saying how great the joint venture is? Remember that every previous great RNS has proven worthless. |
If any chap had any idea about investing he would not be driving an ambulance.
Separately, leaving issues of morality to one side, any serious investor would not get involved in a scheme to carry out a protracted fraud for the paltry sum of £42k - it is hardly worth the effort.
If you are on these boards churning out guff thinking you understand investing but don’t have 40k to hand you really need to find something else to do - such as driving an ambulance.
As to the identity of that ghastly Bobath chap, I have no idea who he is or the pseudonym he adopts on here. |
Krypto In my strong opinion he used the 41 k to buy a property in Italy Under EU law this would count has money laundering. |
How’s the filtering working krypton?
“kryptonsnake - 01 Feb 2025 - 08:47:43 - 27250 of 27282 ANGLE PLC - 2019 THREAD - LIQUID BIOPSY COMPANY - AGL PATT
You came on here telling us to buy STX
Angle is outperforming STX and will continue outperforming
I can see you've been spamming the APTA board with similar garbage
You're just another loon like adw and bones. In the filter bin you go”
Now you are filtered by me so bye. Lowest of the low is to make ridiculous unfounded accusations. Scum ramper trying to drown out any adverse view so you can con new PIs to increase your trading profit. Utter snake. |
So this is PATT
sent from my iPhone |