I can't believe these haven't been suspended due to deloitte not providing the results. How long past the due date are they allowed to go ??
Genuine question |
Thanks blackie for the top up..aiming towards 45-70p. |
Top up for donkey |
One more large buy from blackie and we're off to the races. |
I think that you have a winner here.New Chair and CEO ex Reckitts.underlying earnings of around 4.5p ps.set to grow.Activist investor owns 23pc.scope for m&a action. |
Still waiting for 40p.Could you buy more? |
Looking good in here |
If I had a pound lol |
KPMG messing around Royal Mail now. Their results are also delayed. |
Current debt should be well under £40M now, taking out the £8M provision.
Current assets >£100M?
Get the results published FFS! |
Struggling to break thru 40p blackie. |
Is that a sure thing or a guess?? |
40p plus closing today |
Are you buying more blackie while under 40p?? |
Almost 8 million pounds to be compensated back to aph including legal and reputational damages |
Shorties badly burnt here. |
Confirmation of institution taking profits. |
 Having looked at the full judgement , I see why it took 2 yrs. To quote themselves "The Decision is 727 pages long and is repetitive. The evidence in this appeal,
both oral and documentary, was extensive"
Of interest "The CMA’s evidential case was
extraordinarily thin and comprised largely of unsupported inference"
"Mr Butterfield and Mr Dawson were both impressive and compelling witnesses
who gave their evidence in a clear and courteous manner and did not change
their position in the face of rigorous cross-examination. They were both careful
to distinguish their personal recollections from matters which they had learned
subsequently or had worked out from looking at documents. Both of them
showed a strong sense of solid business integrity"
The judgement was not so complimentary about some of the other companies witnesses
"Mr Sonpal to be an
honest and credible witness (Lexon v CMA [2021] CAT 5 at para 53). We found
him to be an honest witness who was doing his best to tell the truth. We found
him to be a credible witness and in the main reliable, although there were certain
matters such as the date of one of his meetings with Mr Tweedale where he was
clearly not reliable."
It is noteworthy that the Judgement was not about whether the NHS was overcharged. |
540 Million shares in issue , £8M is worth 1.48p per share , ignoring the reputational costs.
Why did it take more than 2 years to come to this conclusion? Due process is one thing, but putting one part time employee to collect the info perhaps?
Good to see the end of that CMA cloud, presumably the directors are also exonerated. Mind you the hiking of Buccastem prices did rip off the NHS . |
all good news in here from now on . Winning court case means 15-20 million jackpot , revenues up , profits up , debt down .. heading right direction |
Given the wording in the original judgement I'm amazed (and very pleased) the appeal was successful. |
Results have to be imminent.
That £8M should be returned in part through a good final dividend. |
Back down to 36p after profit taking |
SP went down from 100p to 35p because if this court case , now they will have loads of money. Hopefully reinstate dividends etc . As they won they have 0 cost for court |
Has that been delaying the results?
Another £8M in the coffers.
Reinstate dividend.
So CEO did not resign due to that. |
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
Hot Features
Premium
