All Active Asset Capital Share Discussion Threads

[johnchapman19] 28/10/2022 13:49

See Sentiance announcement on Twitter

[buggy] 27/10/2022 21:28

El Cid48,
Nothing is going to happen this year that is for certain. I doubt if anything will happen even in the first half of next year and if the economic climate remains the same then you might as well write off next year.

[el cid48] 27/10/2022 18:59

It would be nice if there was ANY communication from the board. At the moment none of us have a clue what they are doing, what their strategy is (if there is one) and when we might be informed. In the meantime we are all just speculating

[folly8] 11/10/2022 19:57

I think saying that communication from the Board "could" be better is a massive understatement. They should be crystal clear on what they are doing. Like it has been said above, they have had long enough. If you wait for everything to go your way, you will never list.

Going by what I hear has happened at Aaqua, I hold little faith.

[ianbonjour1] 06/10/2022 10:02

Maybe or maybe not.
Since the FCA states that an investor should not consider asset-backed investments via collectives over periods of less than five years, one might conclode that ten years was more appropriate.

One can speculate as you have done above but doing so will not alter the facts. We have bought into a high-risk concept which may well lose us every penny.

It would be wise to consider that such investments often amplify the general state of the market, that is, in good times they outperform but in bad times they underperform.

With the current state of global markets, particularly the NASDAQ, I would not be looking to float or create a grey market anytime soon.

I do believe that the communication from the board could & should be somewhat better.

[daddycoold] 06/10/2022 05:05

Define long haul ? Quite a few shareholders have been in this since inception early 2017. They've been locked out of their investment longer than it's been liquid or tradable on the market. So in 5 years they haven't managed to time the market, the only thing they ever did was line their pockets when the original Monchichi investors were otherwise all in by floating AAA to the detriment of the long termers. Then to further kick MCC holders in the nuts they voted to absorb their 40p stock, and swap it 1:1 with AAA. Which now as it stands has nothing but 20% of Sentiance and 32% of what appears to be now nothing (a going concern).Let's face it. Wait another 5 yrs. the guy behind this will be long gone, and so will our money.

[ianbonjour1] 05/10/2022 22:05

The reality is SD4, AAA has always been a speculative concept with a potential for high reward in exchange for total loss.
I only have a few grand invested which if it goes wrong will be sad but not life changing. If it goes well it could be life changing.

[sunnyday4] 05/10/2022 19:41

True, so first some real developments with aaqua and sentiance, than a proper valuation could be a basis to start grey market, now is not ideal indeed.

[ianbonjour1] 05/10/2022 09:36

SD4 - Whilst it is not ideal, creating a 'grey market' or floating in today's arena would likely not be positive for those shareholders in for the long haul.

[the modeller] 05/10/2022 03:08

News Int'l - it s what we do :-)

[sunnyday4] 02/10/2022 07:50

https://aaacap.com/regulatory-announcements/company-update-3/Rns basically more waiting. Worldwide freezing order is over so aaqua can continue and reorganize. Will take some time I guess. No news on sentiance deal.

[festario] 01/10/2022 15:32

Is this a scam then?

[el cid48] 01/10/2022 14:40

Still no frickin real news. Sigh

[ianbonjour1] 01/10/2022 11:49

How very odd

[the modeller] 01/10/2022 05:55

What s your poison vodka or whisky - yummeykins!One won t hurt.Weak man.

[ianbonjour1] 15/9/2022 09:29

It is clear thatwon't be the case on the basis that CVS were unwilling to stump-up a mere £1.5M to keep the case going. To be honest, they have got themselves into a bit of a muddle with this as their unsubstantiated claims have had a severe negative impact on a stock they bought.

I am unsure why you think the transaction will be 'reversed', and clearly CVS are of the same view or they would have coughed-up as ordered by the court.

There is a history of some attempting recourse to unsubstantiated claims when they feel buyer remorse on a transaction.

[the modeller] 15/9/2022 07:14

Perhaps the most salient commercial point is, where CVS see Audioboom s share price in circa a year if the transaction is reversed.

[ianbonjour1] 14/9/2022 23:09

Some salient points:

The deal in February 2021 was done at circa 450.

The price of Boom earlier this year was over 2250.

Might those selling @ 450 be somewhat put-out by the loss of potential growth?

If one was 'a chancer' might one give a law suit a go?

When one is a chancer one often has form in this respect. History is recorded.

If one was confident of ones chances £1.5M is peanuts.

If one is not confident £1.5M could be seen as more loss to add to the poor timing above.

[the modeller] 14/9/2022 19:15

You're wrong, but there is a good case about pub talk with Mike Ashley. Nty nt.

[daddycoold] 14/9/2022 17:44

A material fact is written down on a piece of paper. Pub talk, small talk is wishful thinking

[the modeller] 14/9/2022 17:19

If somebody told you something that was misleading in a transaction (and it was witnessed) that is a material fact, is it not?

[ianbonjour1] 14/9/2022 17:12

Rather negative.
Mr. Candy, having decided not to put his money where his mouth is, has confirmed that he was trying his luck.
As previously alluded, it would be remarkable for an experienced investor to make such a decision on the basis of 'they told me......'
The sums of money involve would justify proof of any interest by large corporations.

[the modeller] 14/9/2022 16:49

1. They allegedly falsely represented the interest from Apple and LVMH

2. Wrt why companies are not solely liable, this is a two way street, e.g.,

Mr Candy has been joined to the proceedings for the purpose of the Inquiry, so that the Aaqua parties may enforce any damages caused by the freezing orders pursuant to undertakings given by both CVS and Mr Candy personally.

Cuckoo Daddio

[ianbonjour1] 14/9/2022 16:04

I am sure you are correct DC but believe you may be communicating with a machine.

[daddycoold] 14/9/2022 15:21

What have they falsely represented ? If the court has found Aaquaverse, which is essentially the holding company of Aaqua where Bonnier is involved not guilty. Then how can he be guilty, as he is the caretaker of the companies. The ultimate liability lay with the company and not the directors of it.