Alizyme Share Discussion Threads

[loafofbread] 23/6/2009 17:04

Well that doesn't look very good does it.

Thought it might be Tim doing a runner, but no such luck.

Anyone fancy phoning 'for more information' LOL.

[dr biotech] 23/6/2009 16:46

Mr De Souza lasted the whole of 3 months. One hopes he had no payoff whatsoever. Still have a few of these but lost hope months/years ago.

[romust] 23/6/2009 14:50

You're particularly upset for someone supposedly not invested monkey boy.

[silverbackalpha] 23/6/2009 14:46

£346K per annum???? How can that happen.

[the_doctor] 23/6/2009 11:16

"£346k pa"!!!

What does he do???

All he does is sit there adn pray that Takeda come along and say they'll take it

He really cannot have anything much else to do

[troutfish] 23/6/2009 11:14

Questions for the AGM or sooner...

1 Explain the "contractual entitlement" David Campbell was alleged to have had to £256k if he voluntarily "resigned".

2 Explain why Tim McCarthy was given a 16.6% increase in his basic salary and pension for 2008, which just seems to be to compensate for loss of his annual bonus, still resulting in a gross overall pay rise for 2008 (£472k) compared to 2007 (£463k).

3 Explain why Tim McCarthy has not voluntary cut his own remuneration more than the 30% announced in April (so it now looks about £346k pa) and thinks he still deserves more than the CEO of the UK NHS (£220k) which is the worlds fourth largest employer with a budget of billions.

How can he possibly be worth this much particularly when the company have never made a profit, emply only 9 staff, have a dwindling pipeline and warnings about going concern matters in the accounts.

4 Explain why William Edge continued in post as a Non Executive Director and received £45k renumeration until he retired in April 2009, when his legal position as a Non Exec Director seems to have officially lapsed at the 2008 AGM when he failed to stand for re-election.

5 Expalin whay there has not been a r-o-w deal for Cetilistat when Tim McCarthy guaranteed one at the 2008 AGM by this time next year ie AGM 2009 in July.

6 Explain why there has not been a deal for ATL104 - not even for Japan - particularly as the company need the cash and it could have been progressed through Phase 2 and into Phase 3 by now.

Is this actually because they cannot do a deal for ATL104?

Do they have any potential partners in place with whom they could do a deal for ATL104 if it was needed to keep the company a going concern?

7 Can they remain as a "going concern" and quoted on the full list of the LSE, based solely on existing cash in the bank and interest payments thereon (excluding any further potential milestons from Colal-pred or ATL104) until the Phase 3 results for Cetilistat Japan are published in H2 2010.

[troutfish] 23/6/2009 11:14

Questions for the AGM or sooner...

1 Explain the "contractual entitlement" David Campbell was alleged to have had to £256k if he voluntarily "resigned".

2 Explain why Tim McCarthy was given a 16.6% increase in his basic salary and pension for 2008, which just seems to be to compensate for loss of his annual bonus, still resulting in a gross overall pay rise for 2008 (£472k) compared to 2007 (£463k).

3 Explain why Tim McCarthy has not voluntary cut his own remuneration more than the 30% announced in April (so it now looks about £346k pa) and thinks he still deserves more than the CEO of the UK NHS (£220k) which is the worlds fourth largest employer with a budget of billions.

How can he possibly be worth this much particularly when the company have never made a profit, emply only 9 staff, have a dwindling pipeline and warnings about going concern matters in the accounts.

4 Explain why William Edge continued in post as a Non Executive Director and received £45k renumeration until he retired in April 2009, when his legal position as a Non Exec Director seems to have officially lapsed at the 2008 AGM when he failed to stand for re-election.

5 Expalin whay there has not been a r-o-w deal for Cetilistat when Tim McCarthy guaranteed one at the 2008 AGM by this time next year ie AGM 2009 in July.

6 Explain why there has not been a deal for ATL104 - not even for Japan - particularly as the company need the cash and it could have been progressed through Phase 2 and into Phase 3 by now.

Is this actually because they cannot do a deal for ATL104?

Do they have any potential partners in place with whom they could do a deal for ATL104 if it was needed to keep the company a going concern?

7 Can they remain as a "going concern" and quoted on the full list of the LSE, based solely on existing cash in the bank and interest payments thereon (excluding any further potential milestons from Colal-pred or ATL104) until the Phase 3 results for Cetilistat Japan are published in H2 2010.

[troutfish] 23/6/2009 11:01

Questions for the AGM or sooner...

1 Explain the "contractual entitlement" David Campbell was alleged to have had to £256k if he voluntarily "resigned".

2 Explain why Tim McCarthy was given a 16.6% increase in his basic salary and pension for 2008, which just seems to be to compensate for loss of his annual bonus, still resulting in a gross overall pay rise for 2008 (£472k) compared to 2007 (£463k).

3 Explain why Tim McCarthy has not voluntary cut his own remuneration more than the 30% announced in April (so it now looks about £346k pa) and thinks he still deserves more than the CEO of the UK NHS (£220k) which is the worlds fourth largest employer with a budget of billions.

How can he possibly be worth this much particularly when the company have never made a profit, emply only 9 staff, have a dwindling pipeline and warnings about going concern matters in the accounts.

4 Explain why William Edge continued in post as a Non Executive Director and received £45k renumeration until he retired in April 2009, when his legal position as a Non Exec Director seems to have officially lapsed at the 2008 AGM when he failed to stand for re-election.

5 Expalin whay there has not been a r-o-w deal for Cetilistat when Tim McCarthy guaranteed one at the 2008 AGM by this time next year ie AGM 2009 in July.

6 Explain why there has not been a deal for ATL104 - not even for Japan - particularly as the company need the cash and it could have been progressed through Phase 2 and into Phase 3 by now.

Is this actually because they cannot do a deal for ATL104?

Do they have any potential partners in place with whom they could do a deal for ATL104 if it was needed to keep the company a going concern?

7 Can they remain as a "going concern" and quoted on the full list of the LSE, based solely on existing cash in the bank and interest payments thereon (excluding any further potential milestons from Colal-pred or ATL104) until the Phase 3 results for Cetilistat Japan are published in H2 2010.

[silverbackalpha] 23/6/2009 10:57

This time. He will not be allowed to skirt around the issue.

Its been what 4 years?????

It's all just damn lies IMO. Misleading lies and half truths.

[troutfish] 23/6/2009 10:54

Re David Campbell.........they seem to be saying he had a "contractual entitlement" to the quarter of a millon quid...........

page 30 of the 2008 Annual Report states....

"(3) Mr Campbell resigned as a Director on 5 September 2008 and was paid £256,000 compensation for loss of office, being his minimum contractual entitlement. Included in this amount is £29,000 to satisy his entitlement to the Deferred Share Award and Contingent Share Award arising in 2007 described below"

(2) The entitlement to a Deferred Share Award and a Contingent Share Award arising in 2007 of Mr Campbell has not been satisfied by the granting of share awards. An amount of £29,000 was paid during 2008 to Mr Campbell, who resigned as a Director on 5 September, as part of his compensation for loss of office to satisy this entitlement entirely".

Looks odd to me if he resigned but nice "contract" if you can get it.

shows the importance of voting against the re-appointment of Tim McC at the AGM rather than allowing him the opportunity to "resign" at some future date.

[dunderheed] 23/6/2009 09:36

re date - don't think so - merely the latest date the Tim could do - hoping for some positive news - b4 it affected his own holidays.

Re FD package - good points and if something 'wrong' here we should be told exactly why he ended up with so much money?

[silent cartographer] 22/6/2009 14:23

Agreed nathan,

Actually, the chart looks all set to break down... unfortunately, there's every chance now that this could fall to 1-2p.

Will be keeping an eye on it though, as it may be worth a punt at those levels... but like you say, only with money that I can afford to write off...

[nathan2] 22/6/2009 13:30

These sort of shares are a gamble and no more than a small amount of money should be put at risk. And held for a short term . Look at the charts this has drained many bank balances just like oxb . Only asm has shown light and then u would have lost money over the long term with the rights issues.
Avoid for the long time take profits when u can and try something else like dsgi or lloy more fun and more future.

[dunderheed] 22/6/2009 13:05

SC - keep on posting buddy you are such a prize chimp - when I put someone on filter they really are on filter - and you continue to respond to me when I have clearly told you that I had filtered you - what a muppet!

Or have you just posted completely out of coincidence after all this time?

M34 - point taken - and will not continue - was just a lttle bored and like yourself cannot be bothered to sell as its all pocket money at these prices anyway?
All I was saying was that if the share price continues to decline we would get a load of SC muppets posting again - making massive trading gains.

Also VOW was shown to be a muppet as well - who was only talking up the share because they had already decided to sell out (and wanted to reduce their loss) - then all that rubbish about Tak schedules from a poster with a verneer of credibility (ie VOW)- ruins it for genuine investors who look into the thread - that was all I was pointing out.
I spotted his shenigans a long time ago and that's why I chose to hound him - that was all? I think such behaviour should be pointed out fairly regularly as a caveat for less experienced adv'ers - who should take heed that everyone always post for their own agendas. (Similar to yourself who wants threads to be limited to genuine posts - and not other agendas?)

BOL all!

[mikey34] 22/6/2009 12:55

Dunderheed,

I don't want to filter anybody...I never have.....I just want the bb to be about the prospects for AZM and to try to genuinely share views with the intention of being informed.

[dunderheed] 22/6/2009 12:46

SC wow am well happy you still take time to respond to me?!!
Now look matey - did you take my tips on afr and smdr?

I have another bone to throw to you if you want - you have missed my last +50% on small o&g company - this one looks the same!?

btw - I thought you had me on the filtered list?

M34 - do yourself a favor matey FFS - why dont you just put me on filter (and the real one - not the SC 'filtered but not really' one - because SC might lose out on a nice tip!)!?

EDIT M34 - and VOW was NOT well informed at all (he seemed to be relying on cosy chats with the Tim for at least the past three years as written about over on iii - at least I'm honest - my investment in azm has always been in spite of Timiny - not because of!!) - as he made a complete laughing stock of himself with the Tak time lines - only to be shown to be the fool he was - what (?) a week later - perhaps he was too busy interviewing the chief exec of the FSA at the time - and hence made an error on his spread-sheets?!
Honestly - and this is a serious point - if that person has a masters degree - what on Earth does that say for the standard of education in this country? I would 'of' thought - that his level of grammatical errors would 'of' been marked down in any type of thesis?!

[silent cartographer] 22/6/2009 12:38

I have to agree with you Mikey.

It seems to me that Dunders is obsessed with VOW. Although Dunders bangs on about his overweight wife, I'm actually thinking that she doesn't exist and that Dunders is in fact 'in the closet' and desperate to come out...

[mikey34] 22/6/2009 12:36

Dunderheed,

Vow has decided to move on and presumably accept his losses.I wish I had done the same some time ago but its too late for me at this point....ie I'm stuck with this and hoping for a bit of a miracle which may or may not come.I see no point whatsoever in you banging on about a poster who was actually pretty well informed and who took a view and then decided it no longer looked sustainable.FFS if you insist on contributing here try to stick to the present rather than futile oneupmanship aimed at someone who was decisive enough to walk away.

[dunderheed] 22/6/2009 07:00

F3 - have been saying the same myself for ages - it is surprisingly easy to get insti's involved in your p.o.v.
I'm to busy and not going to earn anyting from this thus am not motivated - but feel upset at all of the above - as it is true and probably goes a long way to explaining why UK plc is in such a mess as well?

[mad mike] 22/6/2009 04:45

Filbert3, you post makes excellent sense, and is very well argued.