ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.

AMI African Min.

10.00
0.00 (0.00%)
04 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
African Min. LSE:AMI London Ordinary Share BMG0114P1005 COM SHS USD0.01
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 10.00 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

African Min. Share Discussion Threads

Showing 8701 to 8724 of 9750 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  354  353  352  351  350  349  348  347  346  345  344  343  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
15/1/2015
08:52
Thanks for sharing. Not ground breaking rumour is it? Its what the board have been working on for months!. Anything that gets me somewhere near my 20p break even will do me! I guess I'm probably one of the lucky ones with a fairly low average.

fn

fishyneck
15/1/2015
08:43
An SISG offer rumour. Whether that means a percentage sale or a complete buy out for all shares remains to be seen.If the latter, then SISG will have to bring in a Technical Mining Partner to run the 10,000 workers.
seanywauny
15/1/2015
08:20
What's the craic over on LSE? Good or bad or both!!!

fn

fishyneck
15/1/2015
00:37
Seeks like an offer in the making nice and positive at least just a shame millwall lost tonight
kirk 6
14/1/2015
21:16
A hurricane of emotion on the LSE board tonight.
seanywauny
14/1/2015
05:12
That's more like it....
substp
13/1/2015
12:49
whats the price of iron ore? Bar chart is posting wrong informtion.
kirk 6
13/1/2015
12:00
sapper, not much you can do with an IO fall like that, although they should have hedged a lot of their production. Lesson learned for the future (if there is one). Problem with one trick ponies is they are beholden to market disasters like this.
broncowarrior
13/1/2015
09:34
Problem is, Timis can chuck in Lond to keep his 42 million shares, we as shareholders can give nothing more. If he wanted to shaft the shareholders that is the right way to go. I am hoping that the rest of the Board have some integrity left. We shall see.
sapper2476
13/1/2015
08:39
Sapper, yes that chap going is a no news event, still got FT with his 42million shares alongside other stakeholders of AML whom I am hopeful are giving the BoD are harder time than us spouting on a Bulletin Board.

42m sharees toto equal £0 would be on paper a realised loss of over £4.2m even at the last close price, we know he bought at much higher prices, £80m wouldnt be far off it would it. So if your a rich git even losing £m's must hurt as it is all relative!

cantrememberthis2
13/1/2015
07:40
cottoner, very interesting, the last sentence on the RNS...

As negotiations progress... it must be all about stake percentages.

I cannot see AML remaining the biggest stakeholder.

25% AML owning this beast is the best efforts one would hope.

No news now for some time, meanwhile IO tanking overnight as well - joys!

cantrememberthis2
12/1/2015
20:41
'AML will continue to provide updates as negotiations progress'

Probably reading too much into a single word , but 'progress' certainly sounds more positive and optimistic , than say 'continue'.

cottoner
12/1/2015
20:36
Granted but they are holding the purse strings to the pot!
fishyneck
12/1/2015
20:22
SISG aren't chucking in their money though, it's owned by the project company
newswseller
12/1/2015
19:30
Kirk, any negatives being spouted on the other board about this RNS?

Just curious if there's a negative I'm missing from sisg throwing another $13m in the pot???

Fn

fishyneck
12/1/2015
17:22
Good day all in all but could well be in suspension for a few more months
kirk 6
12/1/2015
17:16
Who's to say that SISG aren't open to the possible prospect of a 3rd party acquiring the other 75% with the debt?Perhaps SISG don't wish to acquire more but are entertaining the possibility that a professionally conductive outfit like Glencore will present themselves, honour the original agreements and ensure their 1.5bn investment is secure.
seanywauny
12/1/2015
13:47
CAsual good point !!!
warwick69
12/1/2015
13:40
Idly thinking aloud: Perhaps.....the longer this takes and the less likely it looks like Admin then IF there were companies who were hoping to pick up the bargain-bin pieces post-Admin then they may be encouraged to put a bid in themselves for part or whole of AMI rather than let Shandong get it cheaply?
casual47
12/1/2015
13:20
Good news in a way but problem is therre is not income coming in at the moment. This money could really have been used for other stuff if we were still operating the site. In my view that 100mm needed to be used to to bridge the gap between profit and loss until such time that AMI was back at even at least.

Loan repayments owed - when are they due?

broncowarrior
12/1/2015
12:44
Nice update the release of some funds is good news. Certainly seems admin out the question now. Just have to wait and see the T & C'S
kirk 6
12/1/2015
12:42
casual - me too - if anything, I think today's news is rather better for latecomers to the share than for those who bought earlier; it seems to me the percentage of Tonkolili that SISG will end up owning can only increase as negotiations continue, which likely will mean the share price will take longer to recover its former heights.
Of course it's always possible FT could pull one of his celebrated rabbits from the hat.

earnestwipplethwaiteiii
12/1/2015
12:20
Earnest -- PIs yes perhaps, but there is not an insignificant number of II major shareholders who probably have averages many times the current SP, who can estimate the value of AMI better than any of us and who could together potentially veto a totally derisive offer. Not that that is any kind of guarantee...

I entered into this share as a bottom feeder so I'd probably vote yes to anything...

casual47
12/1/2015
12:16
I guess the only question I have re this RNS is whether SISG would have been responsible for this payment even in administration to pay the taxes etc. This is not my field of expertise. If not then it has to be deemed positive.

fn

fishyneck
Chat Pages: Latest  354  353  352  351  350  349  348  347  346  345  344  343  Older