We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Advance Visual | LSE:ACV | London | Ordinary Share | GB0002565355 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.16 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
09/10/2006 18:10 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
09/10/2006 18:08 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
09/10/2006 18:06 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
09/10/2006 07:56 | Takdeer/Sadika/Smile Glad to see that you have started looking at PSM. Hopefully your minimal research will help you to understand that the majority of Barclay and Shaw's current efforts will be spent trying to finalise the deal for PSM. Did you research RMR/EAM like I suggested? I'd be interested to know your thoughts on their RTO. Here's my previous post again just to remind you: Smiler - I see you're back to your old tricks of misleading folks again. FWIW, I'd say there is zero chance of an RTO in days, as you suggest, as ACV's directors have been desperately trying to prevent the delisting of another of their shells, PSM(cancelled today, FWIW). Secondly, I'd say that this is very likely to be suspended in December before any RTO takes place, as these guys don't seem to come up with deals very quickly. Have you actually bothered to check out the history of ACV's directors? Their most recent activity has been with PSM, which finally came up with some sort of potential RTO announcement on the final day before delisting(after six months of suspension!). It's hard to evaluate the deal, as there is no detail. However, if it's anything like their RMR RTO, which became EAM, it will be garbage, IMHO. RMR had something like 1.5p cash per share on the balance sheet, after originally charging investors 4p per share. The RTO involved a deal and placing at 1.5p, with zero premium for the listing. The company that was taken over had no trading history and was little more than an idea. Guess who'd got themselves on the board of the company to be taken over with sizeable holdings(probably purchased for negligable amounts)? Yes, it was Barclay and Shaw. Doesn't that seem like something of a conflict of interest, as RMR paid several million quid for a non-trading company where Barclay and Shaw were investors and on the board? So, shareholders that paid Barclay and Shaw 4p per share to find them a good RTO ended up with a company that AFAIK, isn't even fullly trading now and has a current bid offer of 0.75p/1.25p. 4.0p to 0.75p. Great work chaps! Would you like to know more, or is that enough for you? If you do phone Barclay, please ask him if the deals for his other shells are likley to be as poor for shareholders as Ricmore was? Ask him if there is any chance of a credible trading company reversing into any of them. Ask him if he and Shaw will be investing in other potential vendor companies prior to any RTO, causing a conflict of interest with their duty to get the best deal for shareholders of their shell companies. All IMHO, DYOR etc. Rgds dell | dell314 | |
08/10/2006 10:58 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
07/10/2006 19:33 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
07/10/2006 19:09 | I'll text him and warn him about a call from you! | double6 | |
07/10/2006 15:11 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
07/10/2006 14:16 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
07/10/2006 12:18 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
07/10/2006 06:21 | HABAYYUT. my advice is don't short this. It will be the most pain you have ever suffered. | william-just | |
06/10/2006 20:28 | lol i dont wear shirts. i wear blouses LOL ROFLMAO | habayyut | |
06/10/2006 20:27 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
06/10/2006 20:26 | tak how many names are you gonna have suehelen smiler optimist sohail takdeer what next?? why do u change your handles every week? | habayyut | |
06/10/2006 20:25 | lol no thanks mate im happy with my shorts in the markets. | habayyut | |
06/10/2006 20:25 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
06/10/2006 20:25 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
06/10/2006 20:23 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
06/10/2006 20:09 | Takdeer two words DMR - LOL!!!! | habayyut | |
06/10/2006 20:05 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
06/10/2006 19:54 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
06/10/2006 06:59 | Takdeer/Sadika/Smile I'd be interested to know your thoughts on their RMR/EAM RTO. Here's my post again just to remind you: Smiler - I see you're back to your old tricks of misleading folks again. FWIW, I'd say there is zero chance of an RTO in days, as you suggest, as ACV's directors have been desperately trying to prevent the delisting of another of their shells, PSM(cancelled today, FWIW). Secondly, I'd say that this is very likely to be suspended in December before any RTO takes place, as these guys don't seem to come up with deals very quickly. Have you actually bothered to check out the history of ACV's directors? Their most recent activity has been with PSM, which finally came up with some sort of potential RTO announcement on the final day before delisting(after six months of suspension!). It's hard to evaluate the deal, as there is no detail. However, if it's anything like their RMR RTO, which became EAM, it will be garbage, IMHO. RMR had something like 1.5p cash per share on the balance sheet, after originally charging investors 4p per share. The RTO involved a deal and placing at 1.5p, with zero premium for the listing. The company that was taken over had no trading history and was little more than an idea. Guess who'd got themselves on the board of the company to be taken over with sizeable holdings(probably purchased for negligable amounts)? Yes, it was Barclay and Shaw. Doesn't that seem like something of a conflict of interest, as RMR paid several million quid for a non-trading company where Barclay and Shaw were investors and on the board? So, shareholders that paid Barclay and Shaw 4p per share to find them a good RTO ended up with a company that AFAIK, isn't even fullly trading now and has a current bid offer of 0.75p/1.25p. 4.0p to 0.75p. Great work chaps! Would you like to know more, or is that enough for you? All IMHO, DYOR etc. Rgds dell | dell314 | |
05/10/2006 20:06 | Post removed by ADVFN | Abuse team | |
05/10/2006 19:14 | yo double6, Get your money in LNG there as safe as houses now, because of all the large buys and there will be no bad news from the company, now it has all been cleared up by the looks of it. I am tempted for a big punt @5.75p tomorrow. Also take a look at WGP which I am also tempted for a punt. | lord santafe |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions