Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advance Visual | LSE:ACV | London | Ordinary Share | GB0002565355 | ORD 0.1P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.16 | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 0.16 | GBX |
Advance Visual Communications (ACV) Share Charts1 Year Advance Visual Communications Chart |
|
1 Month Advance Visual Communications Chart |
Intraday Advance Visual Communications Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/6/2013 | 08:17 | ADVANCED VISUAL : The pheonix is rising | 203 |
| 11/12/2008 | 07:07 | ACV with Charts & News | 596 |
| 16/3/2006 | 09:51 | BEWARE PUMP AND DUMP | 103 |
| 16/3/2006 | 09:36 | ADVANCE VISUAL - possible recovery play ?? | 218 |
| 22/2/2005 | 15:29 | AD - Vis is about to Fizz ! Reverse Takeover this week. | 155 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 15/5/2012 11:25 by lr4850 Another capital reorganisation; don't get the maths but my 1203 vaiomo (already consolidated from a substantially higher number of Acv shares) becomes 100 shares only. Can anyone shed any light on what appears to be the another screwing of shareholders hard earned?? The maths stinks, anyone else think so. |
Posted at 06/9/2011 11:59 by 2magpies Taking over Voiamo Limited (mobile/sim tech) and name to be changed to Voiamo plc which will be listed on AIM (don't know when)ACV shares to be consolidated 50:1 The takeover is all share, on a 1 for 1 basis (post consolidation). |
Posted at 15/7/2011 12:08 by fqr714bhp Can any one tell what has happened to this share? |
Posted at 08/7/2008 21:19 by djr8902 Can someone tell me what's going on with this share? I bought it years ago (don't have many) but haven't been following it. Has trading been suspended?Thanks, |
Posted at 17/7/2007 21:55 by blewco Anybody have any ideas what is happening with this share? |
Posted at 09/10/2006 07:56 by dell314 Takdeer/Sadika/SmileGlad to see that you have started looking at PSM. Hopefully your minimal research will help you to understand that the majority of Barclay and Shaw's current efforts will be spent trying to finalise the deal for PSM. Did you research RMR/EAM like I suggested? I'd be interested to know your thoughts on their RTO. Here's my previous post again just to remind you: Smiler - I see you're back to your old tricks of misleading folks again. FWIW, I'd say there is zero chance of an RTO in days, as you suggest, as ACV's directors have been desperately trying to prevent the delisting of another of their shells, PSM(cancelled today, FWIW). Secondly, I'd say that this is very likely to be suspended in December before any RTO takes place, as these guys don't seem to come up with deals very quickly. Have you actually bothered to check out the history of ACV's directors? Their most recent activity has been with PSM, which finally came up with some sort of potential RTO announcement on the final day before delisting(after six months of suspension!). It's hard to evaluate the deal, as there is no detail. However, if it's anything like their RMR RTO, which became EAM, it will be garbage, IMHO. RMR had something like 1.5p cash per share on the balance sheet, after originally charging investors 4p per share. The RTO involved a deal and placing at 1.5p, with zero premium for the listing. The company that was taken over had no trading history and was little more than an idea. Guess who'd got themselves on the board of the company to be taken over with sizeable holdings(probably purchased for negligable amounts)? Yes, it was Barclay and Shaw. Doesn't that seem like something of a conflict of interest, as RMR paid several million quid for a non-trading company where Barclay and Shaw were investors and on the board? So, shareholders that paid Barclay and Shaw 4p per share to find them a good RTO ended up with a company that AFAIK, isn't even fullly trading now and has a current bid offer of 0.75p/1.25p. 4.0p to 0.75p. Great work chaps! Would you like to know more, or is that enough for you? If you do phone Barclay, please ask him if the deals for his other shells are likley to be as poor for shareholders as Ricmore was? Ask him if there is any chance of a credible trading company reversing into any of them. Ask him if he and Shaw will be investing in other potential vendor companies prior to any RTO, causing a conflict of interest with their duty to get the best deal for shareholders of their shell companies. All IMHO, DYOR etc. Rgds dell |
Posted at 06/10/2006 06:59 by dell314 Takdeer/Sadika/SmileI'd be interested to know your thoughts on their RMR/EAM RTO. Here's my post again just to remind you: Smiler - I see you're back to your old tricks of misleading folks again. FWIW, I'd say there is zero chance of an RTO in days, as you suggest, as ACV's directors have been desperately trying to prevent the delisting of another of their shells, PSM(cancelled today, FWIW). Secondly, I'd say that this is very likely to be suspended in December before any RTO takes place, as these guys don't seem to come up with deals very quickly. Have you actually bothered to check out the history of ACV's directors? Their most recent activity has been with PSM, which finally came up with some sort of potential RTO announcement on the final day before delisting(after six months of suspension!). It's hard to evaluate the deal, as there is no detail. However, if it's anything like their RMR RTO, which became EAM, it will be garbage, IMHO. RMR had something like 1.5p cash per share on the balance sheet, after originally charging investors 4p per share. The RTO involved a deal and placing at 1.5p, with zero premium for the listing. The company that was taken over had no trading history and was little more than an idea. Guess who'd got themselves on the board of the company to be taken over with sizeable holdings(probably purchased for negligable amounts)? Yes, it was Barclay and Shaw. Doesn't that seem like something of a conflict of interest, as RMR paid several million quid for a non-trading company where Barclay and Shaw were investors and on the board? So, shareholders that paid Barclay and Shaw 4p per share to find them a good RTO ended up with a company that AFAIK, isn't even fullly trading now and has a current bid offer of 0.75p/1.25p. 4.0p to 0.75p. Great work chaps! Would you like to know more, or is that enough for you? All IMHO, DYOR etc. Rgds dell |
Posted at 04/10/2006 19:37 by double6 Takdeer / smiler28 / smiler 30..... AZH upto 1.5p ??Best price on the bid (yesterday) was 1.2p (no trades at that price) - current share price 1.0 / 1.1p. 1.5p ?? Talking garbage (as normal ??) |
Posted at 04/10/2006 07:07 by dell314 Sadika/SmilerXX - Did you research ACV's directors like I suggested?I'd be interested to know your thoughts on their RMR/EAM RTO. Here's my post again just to remind you: Smiler - I see you're back to your old tricks of misleading folks again. FWIW, I'd say there is zero chance of an RTO in days, as you suggest, as ACV's directors have been desperately trying to prevent the delisting of another of their shells, PSM(cancelled today, FWIW). Secondly, I'd say that this is very likely to be suspended in December before any RTO takes place, as these guys don't seem to come up with deals very quickly. Have you actually bothered to check out the history of ACV's directors? Their most recent activity has been with PSM, which finally came up with some sort of potential RTO announcement on the final day before delisting(after six months of suspension!). It's hard to evaluate the deal, as there is no detail. However, if it's anything like their RMR RTO, which became EAM, it will be garbage, IMHO. RMR had something like 1.5p cash per share on the balance sheet, after originally charging investors 4p per share. The RTO involved a deal and placing at 1.5p, with zero premium for the listing. The company that was taken over had no trading history and was little more than an idea. Guess who'd got themselves on the board of the company to be taken over with sizeable holdings(probably purchased for negligable amounts)? Yes, it was Barclay and Shaw. Doesn't that seem like something of a conflict of interest, as RMR paid several million quid for a non-trading company where Barclay and Shaw were investors and on the board? So, shareholders that paid Barclay and Shaw 4p per share to find them a good RTO ended up with a company that AFAIK, isn't even fullly trading now and has a current bid offer of 0.75p/1.25p. 4.0p to 0.75p. Great work chaps! Would you like to know more, or is that enough for you? All IMHO, DYOR etc. Rgds dell |
Posted at 28/9/2006 18:45 by smiler28 Today's RNS is very intriguing.......the company at the Interims announced that they could get a new guy at the helm and maybe they have got their 100,000 pounds from them. In return, the guy would get atleast 70 million shares (30%) in Advance Visual when the loan notes are converted. With the person getting 30% stake that would make them one of the majority shareholders and would inc. the new business through a reverse takeover."to acquire a single company or business which will benefit from being listed on AIM, which has experienced management" So this way they've got the new management in and they'll have their equity in the new business. Advance Visual in today's RNS have given hints more than once of their desire to get the new business in. "The Company may convert the Loan Notes at any time in certain circumstances, including the acquisition of a company or business" In Netcentric at similar prices to our current prices Mr Crosby bought shares totalling a 29.99% stake and then was appointed to the board. The price rose to 2.50 pence before settling at 1 pence when they announced they would raise about 250,000 pounds at 1 pence to carry out an acquisition. At the 1 pence level NCS reached a mkt cap of 1.43 million.......ACV would be 2.34 million. The developments that happened with NCS may happen with ACV very shortly. DYOR. If any Reverse Takeover was not forthcoming ahead of the 30 December 06 deadline then why would todays news be out!!! |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
