Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Acacia Mining Plc LSE:ACA London Ordinary Share GB00B61D2N63 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 234.00 0.00 01:00:00
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
234.60 235.40 0.00 0.00 0.00
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Mining 520.52 75.84 11.29 21.1 960
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
- O 0 0.00 GBX

Acacia Mining (ACA) Latest News

More Acacia Mining News
Acacia Mining Takeover Rumours

Acacia Mining (ACA) Share Charts

1 Year Acacia Mining Chart

1 Year Acacia Mining Chart

1 Month Acacia Mining Chart

1 Month Acacia Mining Chart

Intraday Acacia Mining Chart

Intraday Acacia Mining Chart

Acacia Mining (ACA) Discussions and Chat

Acacia Mining Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
26/9/201907:51Credit Agricole SA: Bankster a la Francais273
17/9/201916:44Acacia Mining1,571
23/10/201818:17Atlantic Caspian9
28/1/201317:57TIME FOR ACTION5,707
25/10/201014:50G63

Add a New Thread

Acacia Mining (ACA) Most Recent Trades

No Trades
Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Acacia Mining trades in real-time

Acacia Mining (ACA) Top Chat Posts

DateSubject
20/10/2019
09:20
Acacia Mining Daily Update: Acacia Mining Plc is listed in the Mining sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker ACA. The last closing price for Acacia Mining was 234p.
Acacia Mining Plc has a 4 week average price of 0p and a 12 week average price of 216.40p.
The 1 year high share price is 275p while the 1 year low share price is currently 132.10p.
There are currently 410,085,499 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 0 shares. The market capitalisation of Acacia Mining Plc is £959,600,067.66.
09/8/2019
14:20
rmm4: The offer is 0.168 X the Barrick share price so the current price if ACA is actually at a discount to the offer price.
22/5/2019
09:20
bookwormrobert: Hi NWB! No, you've got the Barrick shareprice wrong. It's $12.12 on the NYSE and 16.25CAD in Toronto. This makes the offer a derisory 1.46p per ACA share. But I don't think today's announcement is the end of this. Not by a very long way.
22/5/2019
09:13
nwb: Barrick Gold trading at $16.24 = £ 12.82 (today's rate = 1.266) 0.153 shares of Barrick Gold for each ACA shares = £ 1.96 per share. Is this maths right - would have thought the share price of ACA would have risen ?
08/4/2019
20:34
trader365: BB posts have no bearing on share price action
01/6/2017
19:59
redbaron10: Just have to be patient.All the last posters have made sensible,pertinent points.If the Tanzanian authorities wanted to fully nationalise the mines,why aren't Petra diamond and Ashanti gold share prices not in free-fall in sympathy with the ACA share price? And why would they bother waiting? If that is what the government's intent is then get on and do it,rather than make themselves look silly with a bogus committee and their laughable findings.Also the president dismissed the mining minister at the same time so his scapegoat and get out clause is already in place.The authorities i feel just want to apply some more pressure without killing the proverbial 'golden goose' which is an appropriate metaphor in Acacia's case! It will be lose lose for all concerned if an agreeable compromise isn't reached,with any future foreign investment into the country put in jeopardy.The US has previously stopped aid to Tanzania,this president is in danger of making his country far poorer,not richer,which isn't his stated aim.It is all very well wanting to root out corruption and fraud in a country's economy but it can't be achieved overnight,or with stunts like this that he's pulled.
30/5/2017
10:55
harry vederci: Acacia Mining now a 'binary investment', figures Investec 30 May, 2017 10:09 - Updated: 11:09 With shares in Acacia Mining down by more than a third since Tanzania's accusation that the company is grossly underreporting the value of its gold exports, Investec said the company was more of a "binary investment" as it "may not be dealing with a rational administration". After an investigation of containers held at Dar Es Salaam port by a presidential committee, the FTSE 250 gold miner, which is 63.9%-owned by Toronto-based Barrick Gold, was accused of reporting only a tenth of the true gold content. The committee claimed to have found gold content of 7.8 tonnes, or 250,000 ounces, which compared to the 26,000oz declared by the company and the 254,552 oz produced in the calendar year of 2016. "We had expected the concentrate ban to be resolved, anticipating perhaps some penalty in the form of increased tax prepayments," said Investec on Tuesday, keeping its 'hold' rating and setting a 'binary' target price outcome of 512p or 235p. "However, given the implausible assertions being propagated by the Tanzanian government, it now appears that Acacia may not be dealing with a rational administration and that there may not in fact be an equitable resolution to come. "Unless some resolution is reached, Acacia now faces the prospect of a protracted and costly legal battle in international courts." The fall in the share price might arguably reflects an appropriate risk adjustment, analyst Hunter Hillcoat wrote, were it not for the improbability of the government’s assertion. If Acacia decides to close its Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi mines to focus on its one remaining mine in the country and emerging production from Kenya, his valuation for the shares crashes to 235p as 2018-19 earnings per share forecasts would reduce by more than half, but if the situation is resolved the base case of 512p offers plenty of upside. "Our sense is that Acacia is now more of a binary investment – it is either worth what it was before this situation, or it is worth the cash that it has in its (non-Tanzanian) banks. We cannot recommend investment in Acacia until the Tanzanian authorities provide some comfort that companies can operate there under predefined agreements."
10/11/2003
08:08
jrsize: Dear Crystalclear, With Americanmoni not changing his mental vuewpoint with the ACA changes and not quoting ACA references we would always be poles apart and I will be closer to reality from just simple points like that even if he was correct and there are no reserves on the ACA licence, which there are, then any one would know that any respectable oil company would or will not be putting tens of millions of money into the AKKUL OIL/GAS field. He is just not educated in the oil/gas business to know that in any Total Petroleum system with proven commercial wells that a respectable size anticline will have commercial hydrocarbons in it. I think you miss the point on my postings. The main point is that I ytilise goof sources and byild up what I think is a good picture,like below a set of good calculations in this case from you which I divided by 20 and used them in conjunction with Dr. Chris John's approach (which I then modified) as a range of ACA share values that are dependent on the real reserves in the ACA licences in this case as I think the New Partner has seen them and is willing to value them. I use Petes and Steves information and we all know I refer on a regular basis to the most important information that ACA has published on page 2 of the ACA 2001 Report. Of course when Americanmoni says there are no reserves on the ACA licences without any real references we all know his so called coice of reality is non existant. When I cover the most probable ACA share prices depending on the results of the Deal and G-6 etc. ACA share prices from 1P to 8P I am not being extreme in any direction. here is an example of my ACA share range not really extreme in any direction and we would never expect to see the VOICE OF REASON even thinking of publishing in thios direction. "Thanks to Crystalclears 50% BOE estimates and how they could relate to the ACA sharen price over a range of 50% Petroleum BOE's I have calculated all of the worse case scenarios ,as I see them, by dividing Crystalclears figures by 20 and converting them to British Currancy and rounding these figures up for 1 Billion BOE to 8P per ACA share. My worse case ACA share prices for a number of 50% BOE volumes on the current ACA licences are as follows; 2 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 16P or higher. 1 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 8P or higher. 1/2 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 4P or higher. 1/4 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 2P or higher. 1/8 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 1P or higher. 1/16 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at .5P or higher. John Size" John Size
09/11/2003
14:45
jrsize: Dear Pete, I was wondering the same thing about cdrnet figures but here goes another thought to add to what is still a difficult financial share picture in terms of what the minimal ACA share price is now that the Partnership deal is done. 1 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 8P or higher. 8P divided by 12 possible oil/gas fields shows a ACA share price of .66P per field or higher. 1/2 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 4P or higher. 4P divided by 12 possible oil/gas fields shows a ACA share price of .33P per field or higher. 1/4 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 2P or higher. 2P divided by 12 possible oil/gas fields shows a ACA share price of .17P per field or higher. ETC. The possible number of fields is Referenced from page 2 in the 2001 ACA report. In my opinion all of these possible fields do not need to be proven reserves before they can be valued in the current deal,for example a satellite sees a desert like ground, as long as a few holes are bored the rest of the desert is pretty well proven in my opinion and the same thing for a Total Petroleum System like 115002 where there are commercial condensate gas wells already in commercial production to the south showing lookalike characteristics etc and there are several local oil/gas fields that are proven. Not to repeat myself since I think you have already said this but like cda my first instinct is that with so much value in the ACA licences we will be made to sell before these and probably additional licences will be developed ,but it will be exciting for me ,after 3.5 years of mainly defense of the ACA commercial licenced hydrocarbon reservoirs, to see what our financial share is especially since when I started investing at 9.75P the ACA licences assets where approx. less then 10% of what they are now and the current share price is virtually 0 until our letters from ACA arrive. John Size
09/11/2003
12:12
jrsize: Dear Slickertom and Netcurtains, Funny just before I came to this BB I thought I had better post one of my posting on just this subject. Of course how much oil/gas has been proven or is probable and possible is the foundation in my opinion of to what type of deal the New Partner has been willing to make but according to mainly Pete G-6 and to Steve G-5 and many other sources of data the terms of the deal has turned all of the ACA share prices on their heads. Below some time ago is a schedule of my worst ACA share price scenario's "Dear ACA Investors, I have no idea if the ACA ADVFN is working now but here goes. Thanks to Crystalclears 50% BOE estimates and how they could relate to the ACA share price over a range of 50% Petroleum BOE's I have calculated all of the worse case scenarios ,as I see them, by dividing Crystalclears figures by 20 and converting them to British Currancy and rounding these figures up for 1 Billion BOE to 8P per ACA share. My worse case ACA share prices for a number of 50% BOE volumes on the current ACA licences are as follows; 2 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 16P or higher. 1 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 8P or higher. 1/2 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 4P or higher. 1/4 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 2P or higher. 1/8 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 1P or higher. 1/16 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at .5P or higher. John Size" John Size PS The Crystalclear figures are not the ones he recently has posted. You can see that when Americanmoni and Crystalclear are now questioning 5P per ACA share for 1 Billion BOE,like Dr. Chris John's estimated in his Sept. 7 1998 Report to ACA which I think is pretty close to correct in the main except for his strata depth error, that my estimates are up on Americanmoni's and Crystalclears. Of course the ACA share prices listed above are based on a mixture of proven,probably and possible Hydrocarbon reserves and these figures are handled most likely by a third party oil/gas service company before being included in the official New Partnershop Deal ,which ever type of deal it is,which we should find out this week. I like cda's favourite guess if I have remembered it correctly as being, an ACA share buy out due to the G-6 extension and maybe even the G-5 extension. I hope I remembered your most favourite ACA New Partnership deal guess correctly cda,please correct me if I have made a hash of it..
06/10/2003
06:12
jrsize: Dear Crystalclear, Thank you again for your calculations which I have now transformed into worse case scenarios of ACA share prices per 50% probabilities of different values of BOE (Barrels Of Oil or Oil Equivalent). Here are all of the worse case scenarios ,as I see them, which by dividing your figures by 20 and converting them to British Currancy and rounding the the resulting 7.5P share figure for 1 Billion BOE at 50% propability (1 billion in this case represents 1,000 million Barrels) figures up for 1 Billion BOE to 8P per ACA share. My worse case ACA share prices for a number of 50% BOE volumes on the current ACA licences are as follows (1 billion in this case represents 1,000 million Barrels; 2 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 16P or higher. 1 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 8P or higher. 1/2 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 4P or higher. 1/4 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 2P or higher. 1/8 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at 1P or higher. 1/16 Billion BOE at 50% looks to put the ACA share price at .5P or higher. John Size
Acacia Mining share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
LSE
ACA
Acacia Min..
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20191021 05:48:44