Union Jack Oil Share Discussion Threads

[kinkell] 29/8/2019 23:25

Uggy100,

Thanks for response. It sounds plausible but if accurate it is disappointing that shareholders were not made aware. There must be an explanation and members are entitled to know what it is.

SIRJam, I am not aware of lies in rns' but have witnessed untruths in podcasts - but must make clear not with reference to UJO or RBD.

[uggy100] 29/8/2019 23:11

kinkell, I can't remember where I picked the information up from but I questioned it with a retired oil5y I know who said it was certainly possible.
Sirjam, CEO's can certainly be prone to exaggeration but as to telling whoppers I doubt they'd get away with it. No doubt someone will now provide an example ! lol

[guesswhosback2] 29/8/2019 22:40

Wow wysteria hysteria. Ask the long term posters if I hold big stock. I said ignore me, so do so. Dont make a fool of yourself.

[wisteria2] 29/8/2019 21:43

Apologies for my belch, but the gin has gone in ....

[sirjam] 29/8/2019 21:10

This might seem a very naive question but to what extent can CEO’s lie to the shareholders through a RNS or podcast. Some of the posts on here imply today’s statements absolute fiction. Would they not be held accountable for these lies if so? I’m knew to all this by the way

[kinkell] 29/8/2019 20:48

Uggy100

That is interesting. What is the source, please?

[uggy100] 29/8/2019 20:42

Whattheduce

Were you aware that the original oil gas seperator could ony handle circa 22 bblspd? Id suggest that was why no oil was flowes, the kit they had in place simply couldnt handle the anticipated flow rates.

[guesswhosback2] 29/8/2019 19:40

We are just at the beginning of this road. So much oil they are needing to retest and appraise. Press are all over it. It will rise and stale bulls will be replaced. Next natural slow down at 0.50 then at 0.60 as recent buyers take profit. Thats my guess anyway.

FWIW I'm staying fully loaded until 1.0 minimum by which time we will have a better understanding of this well and its potential AND could be much further forward on Wressel.

I hold 40m shares so ignore anything I say.

[maxwell] 29/8/2019 18:44

The overriding factor is the value given then attributable to UJO
& divided by shares in issue. Plus a lot of shares issued & to be
issued so the value really needs to be high for retirement thoughts.

[currypasty] 29/8/2019 18:33

at the end of the day, .3p is too low for that discovery, and will correct in due course...imho

[maxwell] 29/8/2019 18:30

Very true & I have been hanging on since 2014

[guesswhosback2] 29/8/2019 18:15

Well even if they are offloading at 0.30 new buyers are in from there.

[bionicdog] 29/8/2019 18:15

A lot more than that if you look at the late ones.

[maxwell] 29/8/2019 17:53

Trades today 678 & shares traded 615mil with 77% buys hence must
be someone supplying the difference?.?.?.

[bionicdog] 29/8/2019 17:39

Some big trades showing up now , still no TR1s.

[guesswhosback2] 29/8/2019 17:32

Original price was 0.25 and warrants at 0.30. Lots of original investors clearing out I suspect.

[paulchuckle] 29/8/2019 17:11

My trade at 16:29 657,047 was a buy!!

[bionicdog] 29/8/2019 17:01

If we have to wait to be bought out to realise true value , so be it.
I remain . . . calm like a bomb.

[markfrankie] 29/8/2019 16:50

Yes it will be really good when we get rid of some of these small% traders

[bakedbean] 29/8/2019 16:38

Another day of ending on the lows, from 30% to 8% .. same story for 3 weeks . Great highs only to end on the lows .. a lot of selling pressure into these highs

[talkman2] 29/8/2019 16:23

The company must be very disappointed with the market response

[currypasty] 29/8/2019 16:20

I cant see UJO directors being happy with a 5% rise in the shareprice after that rns?