Tlou Energy Share Discussion Threads

[donkey40] 24/3/2018 23:10

Buzz - you really are weird man!!!!

[donkey40] 24/3/2018 12:08

Stop posting utter sh1te mate. And stop trying to ramp a dog of a stock. You have lost the last 18 months if your life trying to get paid and make profits following this dog - the jurisdiction just isn’t right for Aussies in Africa. Especially those that very obviously only want to price Reserves and run off with a pot of cash.

The good people of Botswana are not going to let Tlou do that. Why on earth do you think the RFP has been cancelled, pulled, delayed, or whatever you want to call it. Tlou get to spend the remaining $7m And by then the story will be even more old and tired and no chance to pull money in at a sensible share price.

You just do see the obvious. I almost feel sorry you, even after forewarning you for a year now. Hope this helps.

PS I love the way you reply every single post of mine. Why is that? Why do you feel you need to reply every single time? Others here don’t seem to have the same problem understanding simple English as you do.

And to be honest, I don’t even read your posts any more. I get bored as I heard what you say so so so many times before.

[donkey40] 24/3/2018 08:53

Oh well I suppose that is as close as I will ever get to an acknowledgment that my point is valid and correct. So the EIS they trumpeted widely about in late 2016 wasn’t as complete or extensive then as they claimed. And their mining licence is for 900 km2 area so it really isn’t a proper licence issued as per clause whatever of Mines n Minerals Act.
And the RFP is being re- tendered so add one more year minimum. Connection to the grid to deliver other offtakes before there is a Govt supported Offtake such as the RFP probably will never happen.

In short, short Tlou coz it is screwed. I been telling you for a while now. Have a great week end L and H.

[ifthecapfits] 24/3/2018 08:34

Not sure why you bother engaging personally. The filter bottom is there for a reason.

[wheniamfree] 24/3/2018 06:35

No problem with the English language whatsoever. I sense the angle you are coming from which is giving you difficulty but if you understood the process “as you claim you do” it would all become clear. I can’t do all your home work for you, figure it out yourself Mr know-it-all.

As soon as Tidd posts your all over him, he really did a number on you didn’t he?

Are your pals on Kenmare paid? I mean they post about the company too don’t they? Surely an investor who does research and shares isn’t necessarily paid? If they are, can you slip me a few £ for constantly having to help you?

[donkey40] 23/3/2018 23:24

Finally some decent posts on LSE between gods and sentimentalist. Typical of Tidd - he just had to jump into a 2-way conversation.

And b*gger me, Tidd copies the Shore Capital Reserves valuation model - good for him.

Is anyone out there prepared to disclose the going rate for a company stooge planted on message boards with the specific brief to spin the PR ? Please please send me a private message and spill the beans.

This is a whole big nasty den of worms - full of snakes and toads !! Nasty people.

[donkey40] 23/3/2018 22:17

Mate - you are the fool !!

Why is English language causing you such a problem. The contradiction between the RNS and the choreographed Q&A spin, augmented with your nonsense about the Q being all about mid/down stream is as obvious as the pluck on TOP of your nose.

Squeeze it, you will feel better !!

[wheniamfree] 23/3/2018 21:44

I understand it perfectly Donkey - it is clearly YOU who doesn’t get it.

Next time you get on your high horse and attempt to discredit the information given in RNS take a step back and think about things.

I’d give you a spade but you’ve already out done yourself today.

How you have the arrogance to portray you know so much and call everybody here fools is beyond me.

[donkey40] 23/3/2018 21:15

You still don’t get it - you thick brick.

[wheniamfree] 23/3/2018 19:11

If I had permission to prospect a mining lease for gold and opened up a 5km zone, I would then seek the best place to locate my plant that was close to high grade pay and close to a relevant water source. I would then request the relevant approvals to go into production and define my plant location as per the findings of my prospect.

What good would it be seeking approval 6 months earlier if I then got granted and my plant was located 4km from the main pay zone and I had to then truck it all?

Give up mate and go to bed. Your as thick as two short planks.

[wheniamfree] 23/3/2018 19:05

Donkey ffs.

Is there anyone else here that can explain it to this muppet?

It’s a basic concept!!!

[donkey40] 23/3/2018 18:53

The wells are part of Upstream and your Q&A says the well locations have only recently been confirmed post seismic and reserves work. A

The 2016 RNS is written in a way that suggests/ says all aspects of the EIS then had been approved and details agreed.

English is your first language - right ?

Hence the blindingly obvious gaps between the 2 - well obvious to anyone except you 2 genius.

[donkey40] 23/3/2018 17:25

Yup it is a genuine question. It is asked becoz of your answer yday to the Q&A post about EIA approval.

As I thought, you really believe anything these guys tell you and you just churn it all out there.

Love it, you haven’t got a clue at times

[wheniamfree] 23/3/2018 17:05

Sorry but is that a genuine question?

Lol.

Give up donkey your a moron.

[donkey40] 23/3/2018 16:55

Mate - is the final location of Wells part of midstream or downstream ?

You are stupid !!

[wheniamfree] 23/3/2018 16:09

Donkey - still out of your depth and still claiming ambiguity and disengenous yada yada. I thought you knew everything about Tlou? Instead of getting on your high horse let me show you how stupid you are.

The EIA dated in the RNS from September which you keep quoting is in relation to the upstream. I advised you previously that no Company can even drill an exploration or development well without seeking such approvals and as usual you weren’t aware. That EIA takes around 18-24 months to complete hence another reason why it puts the nearest competitor so far behind because they must seek all the approvals before they can even begin to put wells in place and dewater/flow test etc. Following that they can perhaps seek to book reserves and then apply for the production license etc. So 3-5 years total perhaps?

The points in Q1 are in relation to the mid and downstream EIAs. The upstream was the first of its kind in that there has never been an EIA completed for CBM hence why it will have taken longer and is a significant achievement.
The EIAs for midstream and downstream are probably ten a penny since there are plants and transmission lines all over Bots and all would have had to go through the same approval process.
Q1 and it’s point of waiting for confirmation of well placement would undoubtedly be related to understanding where the plant will be located precisely and therefore where the transmission lines will be run. A plant located close to the production wells will of course reduce capex further since less trunking will be needed. Now until the time of well placement is confirmed how can you define where the plant and transmission lines are placed as of course, they could be subject to change.

Now no ambiguity nor is anything disengenous as you claim. To summarise - you haven’t got the first clue about the project and you are out of your depth.

I have no issue providing you with clarity if you ask the questions but no, instead you tell everybody it’s all wrong and everyone is at fault and only you know best etc etc. My how stupid you must feel, yet another example of where I have had to put you right.