Teathers Fin Share Discussion Threads

[lobula] 07/6/2016 19:18

dazzle71
Posts: 638
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 2.125

RE: Ok/Le/Mi/Ni/Bi/and other regula..20 Nov '15Beer,that clarifies things somewhat in that we're now able to understand you're posting because you have a chip on your shoulder.

It also explains why you don't understand the current business. I really don't care about anything in your last two posts. It's irrelevant for the present and future.

I notice quite a lot of your posts are subsequently removed as they're usually misleading and ill informed

[lobula] 07/6/2016 19:17

Drewriot
Posts: 674
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 2.125
View Thread (3)RE:
Evening investors...20 Nov '15Yeah that beer idiot has Sonia written all over it. Some people have far to much time on their hands. I can't imagine how sad it is making mutiple profiles.

Yeah TEA is a hold for me... Infant business and micro-cap. So much room to move and so few shares.

I think people just need to let the TEA guys wor

[lobula] 07/6/2016 19:15

You couldnt be this stupid

Starsailor
Posts: 2,407
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 1.875

RE: No good23 Nov '15Yes Sonia...whatever you say..I mean remember, you've been 100% wrong so

[lobula] 07/6/2016 19:14

azzle71
Posts: 638
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 2.25

RE: Some spouting some rubbish here7 Dec '15agree with bolierboy. It's an AIM problem not an actual issue with the company itself. Let Chal relist and go from there I say. They'll update us when there is something of note to say, for the moment its a waiting game.

Business carries on as usual.........

[lobula] 07/6/2016 19:12

jimbobtechstock
Posts: 2,139
Premium Chat Member
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 2.25

RE: Some spouting some rubbish here7 Dec '15Who owns the app? Assume it's TFSL Ltd and not TEA Plc. So it shouldn't matter how the development costs are accounted for as it all hinges on whether a buyer can be found for private subsidiary TFSL IMO. Doesn't matter a jot how they accounted for the expenditure, when it comes down to it its worth what someone is prepared to pay for the asset and because it's not a listed investment where do you start with that?

IMO.

[ionlypostafterbbms] 07/6/2016 16:20

'They' would be the same shrewd investors who were talking up Jason Drummond's extraordinary history with successful tech companies & capabilities as an internet whizzkid just a few months back?

LOL!

[solarno lopez] 07/6/2016 12:26

I see they are talking of prosecutions over on LSE based on the bullish video presentation by the Directors

[ionlypostafterbbms] 06/6/2016 15:50

11:43AM
PM Hey, we have a chance to share a pic of this chap
PM Perhaps a last chance…
PM Jason Drummond



PM NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF ADMISSION TO TRADING ON AIM

TEATHERS FINANCIAL PLC

BE Aw.
PM I sense trouble behind the scenes here
PM There was an attempt to sack Jason and chums
PM But they seem to have dodged that — and are now delisting
PM To concentrate on this daft app as a private company
PM I looked at the phone app
PM It’s supposed to allow retail clients the chance to plugging into new issues like institutions
PM How long have people been trying to do that?
BE This is the magic Shard Capital Partners unlisted company investment engine, right?
PM It doesnt work, ok?
PM Yeah, was about to mention
BE Of course it doesn’t.
BE
PM The app routes to Shard
PM
PM One of those broking operations where none of the management are named
PM You can of course go to the FCA register…
PM
PM Best of luck there

[bobby.ifa] 06/6/2016 09:37

Makes you wonder how significant the reputational damage will be, if any. Get the feeling that TEA was one of JD's play things.

[solarno lopez] 06/6/2016 08:13

and non binding heads of terms hahahaah

[ionlypostafterbbms] 06/6/2016 08:09

Teathers Financial officially kicked off AIM. Another complete disaster from Jason Drummond & Nilesh Jagatia, aided by their new BFF Oliver Fattal.


NOTICE

06/06/2016 7:00am

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF ADMISSION TO TRADING ON AIM

TEATHERS FINANCIAL PLC

[solarno lopez] 06/6/2016 07:42

Non binding heads of terms ...MEANS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ....it is not binding in law

Clearly the board are trying hard to deflect the EGM Requisitionists with this pathetic scare tactic

[ionlypostafterbbms] 03/6/2016 17:05

"the Board is pleased to announce that Teathers has now signed a definitive, non-binding, Heads of Terms agreement with an individual investor"

"definitive, non-binding". FFS.

[solarno lopez] 31/5/2016 14:15

I see from the LSE board that Baron Bloom was involved with the company

[solarno lopez] 31/5/2016 12:43

It is pleasing to see that the guys on LSE have a casus belli

So lets support the forthcoming EGM