We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
St. James's Place Plc | LSE:STJ | London | Ordinary Share | GB0007669376 | ORD 15P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.00 | 2.99% | 447.60 | 448.80 | 449.60 | 452.20 | 433.20 | 438.00 | 2,323,378 | 16:35:01 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trust,ex Ed,religious,charty | 18.98B | -10.1M | -0.0184 | -244.02 | 2.46B |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
28/3/2024 11:15 | Not very interested in 20%. Thanks. So far in 2024 my 3 best performers have tripled, doubled and risen by 80%. | the millipede | |
28/3/2024 09:55 | POLR currently in the early stages of a huge breakout to the upside, lots of scope to rise 20% this year....;-) 10% yielder too..... | davethehorse | |
28/3/2024 09:08 | I agree with you Millipede but jakleeds seems to have some sort of agenda. He won't tell us his invested position here though. I'm kind of hoping he has a massive short bet open but I doubt it. | dexdringle | |
28/3/2024 08:18 | “There is worse to come here in terms of news I suspect.“ This isn’t a bank with a complex balance sheet. There aren’t any liabilities, except those the FCA invent after the fact. The provision for complaints is massive and may not all be needed. Capital inflows last year when every other asset manager saw outflows suggests the business is growing well. This is not being recognised in the share price. Surprise more likely to the upside IMO. | the millipede | |
27/3/2024 09:44 | Anyone who has worked there for more than 12 months, and is therefore partly responsible for the current situation, should be prohibited from taking part in new share incentives at an exercise price of less than £10 a share. | dexdringle | |
27/3/2024 09:26 | Normal service resumed here. New CEO gets share options but hasn’t put his own hand in his pocket. No sign of any share buy backs either. There is worse to come here in terms of news I suspect. My previous forecast of £3 by Xmas is probably a bit on the high side. | jakleeds | |
25/3/2024 16:55 | Bottom pickers paradise, added a few on top of last week. | jackdaw4243 | |
25/3/2024 15:06 | If you do, I think you'll see £5 pretty quickly. And then £6 if you then hold for three months. | dexdringle | |
25/3/2024 14:17 | Maybe. I am a buyer at £4.60. | the millipede | |
24/3/2024 09:13 | Well, at least SJP have got ahead of the game and already had their 60% crash. Not sure in what way I'm deluded. I'm not exactly saying anything controversial. NY Boy, are you long or short here ?(please don't tell me you are one of those BB timewasters who doesn't have a position) | dexdringle | |
24/3/2024 06:01 | Poor dingle, deluded as ever, just another that has been right royally shafted Markets are going to have a big correction soon be ready with your tin hat. Buffett has a massive cash war chest ready | ny boy | |
24/3/2024 00:27 | Exactly. I stopped looking at broker targets years ago, as you say they just alter them after the event. About as useful as last weeks lottery numbers! | tim 3 | |
23/3/2024 16:48 | 《《 I love how these 'experts' change their share price forecasts AFTER the event. What about all the people who followed their previous target of £9.50 ? Then they talk about SJP being a possible bid target without mentioning at what price they think that bid might come. I'm sure if a £7.50 bid appears they'll increase their target to....£7.50 🤣. Mind you, I can't imagine long term holders being very happy with £7.50 with the shares having been £17 two years ago. | dexdringle | |
21/3/2024 12:12 | Yes, the SJP succession plan does currently depend on other advisers having the funds (or borrowing) to buy clients of retiring advisers. Mind you, this is also true of any IFA wanting to sell - the buyer has to get the money from somewhere. SJP may have to lower the sale value of clients to, say, 3 x annual ongoing advice fees rather than 6 x. Or buy them themselves and then pay advisers to service them and those advisers maybe purchasing the clients piecemeal or gradually or whatever once they have a relationship. Or subsidising the interest rate on loans. I'm sure they are considering all sorts of options. Hopefully the new guy has some fresh ideas because Croft was hopeless. With the share price having recently fallen from £12 to just over £4 (having been £17 two years ago) you have to assume that lots of bad stuff is already in the price. It recently had an enterprise value of £11 a share I think. I can see these getting above £5 again soon. You are right though - at this point they aren't for widows and children. SJP aren't THAT different to others. If SJP goes bust then the whole sector is in trouble..... | dexdringle | |
21/3/2024 11:12 | Agree with the sentiment of your last paragraph Dex. The biggest risk to the professional lives of financial advisers is the regulator, and this has been true for a long time (since at least the turn of the century with the pension mis-selling review). The FCA seems to have taken a serious leaf out of the House of Lords playbook in destroying Equitable Life, all for the benefit of customers! I have wondered about buying in here, of course, but too many firms over the years have gone bust or pulled out of the UK, all because they followed rules at the time that were then retrospectively changed. And this comes on top of higher interest rates potentially undermining SJP’s entire adviser model which relies on new advisers taking out large loans to buy the advice portfolio of those advisers wanting to retire. In cannot be stressed too much that right now we don’t know whether SJP has any kind of viable future business at all. That doesn’t say, don’t invest. But know the risk IMO. | the millipede | |
21/3/2024 08:53 | Being a client of SJP includes signing up to ongoing access to your adviser. SJP do not sell products direct or through non approved third parties. I'm sure SJP clients can call their adviser at any time. And if they can't get in touch with their adviser they can call SJP Head Office. Yes, their description of charges is awkward. Going forward it won't be after they remove the option for 100% of peoples money to be invested and instead take a charge bite out of it - or charge a separate up front fee. Great 🙄. The charges themselves are easily broken down and are stated as a £ value on annual statements. The FCA are killing the entire industry now with ludicrous requirements and standards. Many applied retrospectively so the risks are becoming insane. A lot of advice firms will give up well before SJP finally do. The 'advice gap' will become an 'advice chasm'. | dexdringle | |
20/3/2024 22:55 | “Exactly. As an adviser, each client not seen is a missed sale opportunity. Advisers pay fortunes for 'hot leads' so they would be stupid to ignore clients already on the books !” The missing piece here is “wealth management” a service which has the potential to generate recurring revenue for very little/ no ongoing work. In the industry it is even touted sometimes as exactly this! Or it might be that advisers have written to these clients to offer ongoing services, had no reply, but charged anyway year after year. Remember all SJP clients are tied in to SJP investment products with their notoriously opaque charges. And there was little danger of clients moving investments elsewhere because of exit charges (something else that is going under the more customer friendly regime at the FCA). | the millipede | |
20/3/2024 19:04 | 👍👍 | dexdringle | |
20/3/2024 18:43 | As for your Porch comments I'm with you on that | fenners66 | |
20/3/2024 18:42 | Dex,I'm not casting aspertions over the quality of their advice but no one can argue that NOT giving advice IS the opposite of "Providing" anything . Have they ever front covered the accounts with that strapline before? It's got a sick irony if when they provide such a huge amount in these accounts for their failings , if they chose to use it now. | fenners66 | |
20/3/2024 17:53 | 《《 The issue affected 6,108& So SJP are one. Quilter are another. Who are the other 229 firms 🤔 | dexdringle |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions