We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
---|---|---|---|
SLF Realisation Fund Limited | KKVL | London | Ordinary Share |
Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
---|---|---|---|---|
12.30 |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 29/3/2023 06:57 by spectoacc Agreed @wilwak, tho aa @chucko1 says, KKVL/SLFX have form here. Recall the NAV statement saying all's well, followed by a catastrophic update about a week later, followed by months of silence.Then the vast write-downs, which turned out to be largely uneccessary. Agree two RNS in a day, bad then good (better than other way around?) can be added to that list. |
Posted at 27/3/2023 18:05 by wilwak Well …… two announcements on the same day..First one in the morning pretty negative and provoked some selling and a reduction in the ordinary share price Then in the afternoon a positive announcement about a strong dividend including a magic extra £3m of funds causing buying and a increase in the share price. Seems a little improper to me. Will we see tomorrow that any insiders bought on the dip? I actually reduced my holding a little after the first announcement. Not something I’d have done if I’d known about the second announcement. One single announcement would have been better! |
Posted at 22/7/2022 08:26 by ctrader3 The following amendment has been made to the Return of Capital announcement released on 11 July 2022 at (11:11:28 hrs) under RNS No 0135S. The Ex-Dividend date has been changed from Sunday 24 July to Friday 22 July 2022 All other details remain unchanged. The full amended text is shown below.12 July 2022 SLF Realisation Fund Limited ---------------- xd dates are normally a Thursday but this is xp. |
Posted at 12/7/2022 09:41 by ctrader3 The following amendment has been made to the Return of Capital announcement released on 11 July 2022 at (11:11:28 hrs) under RNS No 0135S. The Ex-Dividend date has been changed from Sunday 24 July to Friday 22 July 2022 All other details remain unchanged. The full amended text is shown below.12 July 2022 SLF Realisation Fund Limited ("the Company") LEI: 2138007S3YRY3IUU4W39 RETURN OF CAPITAL VII |
Posted at 20/5/2022 10:56 by 2wild Best thing I ever did was move to interactive investor. Pay £20 a month and you get 2 free trades a month, to use in your ISA and/or trading account. Subsequent trades are just 399p, dividend reinvestment 99p and free regular monthly investments. Can also add a SIPP, £10 a month extra, first six months free. The tax man will top up by 25%. Even non taxpayers can put in £2,880 and interactive will take about 7 weeks to claim £720 from the government. |
Posted at 17/3/2022 09:41 by spectoacc If they've forward-sold energy which, for production reasons, has been difficult to supply, then higher energy prices = insolvency.Not saying that's the case, but output tends to get hedged for the cashflow benefits. I've asked the question many times in the past: are the AD loans performing? My impression was that they weren't - ie not paying KKVL's interest, despite supposedly being backed by subsidies. And that down to production issues, not power prices. But not having held any KKVL for a long time, all from memory only. The co don't seem to say much about the ADs, which after this length of time ought surely to have been sold, if there were buyers. Edit - @chucko1, you'll know if the ADs are paying interest? |
Posted at 02/3/2022 06:49 by spectoacc ....But there's been none so far.@2wild - fair point, an interest distribution may be little different to a capital gains distribution for many. Dividend would be more costly tax-wise for non-ISA/SIPP tho. |
Posted at 01/3/2022 06:20 by 2wild Assume 1p on Ords is interest. Must be more economical to issue a dividend rather than mess around issuing and cancelling new shares. |
Posted at 24/12/2021 13:48 by chucko1 chucko1 - 17 Nov 2021 - 10:43:01 - 683 of 723 KKVL with Charts and News - KKVLIt is clear that there have been decent amortisation on the loans within the Cs portfolio. This has the effect of increasing the capital repayments (28pps since June 30th). the problem is that there have been further amortisation since the June 30th NAV publication and which will have been included in the 28pps. I estimate just about 2pps attributable to this, in which case the NAV is likely nearer to 32p which is not far at all from what I had modelled. But we should still add into this the effective IRR of the loans which I estimate to be around 0.8p. I see little point looking at the Ords in detail as the loans are effectively equities with no bond/loan analysis as relevant as it is with the Cs. As Siobhan Sharpe would say - "Go ADs". So the published NAV was 31.95p. My estimate was 32p, so I am pleased the model is doing what it ought. This is important as I have modelled the amortisations and I think I really understand what is going on here. I bought even more just before the close today as I feel that no one is bothered with this any more and not taking advantage of what is on offer. Worth noting the market cap of just £29.52mn basically takes this off many radar screens. Not mine. I have given up analysing the Ords as they are ADs or a French glass loan. Anything might happen, although I retain a few for the pure cheapness/optionalit Also worth noting that retail only hold a small % of Cs and Ords. Not many retail properly understand asset-backed, especially smashed-up loan funds. Those who originally held likely harbour a hatred for its management, which leaves the coast clear for the clear-minded. |
Posted at 07/7/2021 11:41 by ctrader3 The value of my holding on my published thread so nosecret but not my actual holding, is £4,073.00 capital to be returned £711.00. If this was a dividend, which it isn't as it's not repeatable, although some Trusts like EAT do pay dividends from income and capital, the equal dividend yield would be 17%. So I am happy to hold for another year or until another distribution. IF they sold the remaining assets at NAV, I would break nearly even, I know it's unlikely so I still expect to make a loss, even allowing for returns on the capital returned invested elsewhere but not the sizeable loss I was looking at once upon a time. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions