We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sdi Group Plc | LSE:SDI | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B3FBWW43 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.00 | 7.25% | 74.00 | 73.00 | 75.00 | 74.00 | 69.50 | 69.50 | 832,992 | 12:35:53 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coml Physical, Biologcl Resh | 67.58M | 3.87M | 0.0372 | 19.76 | 76.48M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
06/11/2014 19:34 | Bakunin. I took an interest in SDI as a result of my respect for the thread instigator Nick2008.He does not post much, yet seems pretty knowledgeable,with his successes including AtukUK (now CloudBuy) @ 5 pence against the current 45.. Otherwise I am self taught on matters Scientific. There are precious few (if any) bullish posters here,so if you find a reason for optimism,do let us know. | mudbath | |
06/11/2014 15:00 | Hello Bakunin ! I have spent much time getting the feel of SDI and so appreciate the thrust of your posting. It is a nuance thing really. For example,whilst you are correct as regards the treatment of capitalised development expenditure,where amortisation is due to occur over three years;it is the level of those last year costs which I would regard as exceptional,thus leading to lower A&D over future years.My reasoning here being that the past two years have been ones of enhancing and redefining the whole product range resulting in the aforementioned costs running some £200k above the norm. Similarly with adverse currency influences,rationali As regards revenues,I believe that the increasing range of offerings and its revised pricing,added to new innovative products developed both in house and via the Opus investment should see a marked uplift in sales. Almost every paragraph of the annual report suggests that there is more than a degree of optimism regarding current and future prospects. Whilst the BOD have often opined that they believe SDI has the products to meet market requirements,to my knowledge this is the first time they have espied "success". "The Board has a positive view for success in the current financial year." As stated,the shares in SDI are illiquid.If bought judiciously around current levels then I would confidently expect to see the value of any such investment double at worst over the coming 12 months. I could of course be wrong,yet such is my strong opinion. | mudbath | |
06/11/2014 09:22 | "The Board has a positive view for success in the current financial year." At just 11 pence,I have an exceptionally positive view on the trend of the share price over the next twelve months. Strip out the kitchen sink exceptionals from last years figures and the potential for an eye watering turnaround from loss to significant profitability emerges. Illiquidity has forced the share price down to its current ludicrously low level as a trickle of investors have ditched their holdings in an unwilling market. A sharp upward reversal lies ahead as SDI prepares to present its interim accounts in December. Imo. | mudbath | |
04/11/2014 12:58 | That's the least we should come to expect, a very disappointing performance thus far by this co., a lot of talk from management, they now need to walk the walk, otherwise they should be whipped! | bookbroker | |
04/11/2014 12:46 | Last year was one of (costly)transformati The y/e April 2014 figures were particularly dampened by the exceptionally high(non cash) depreciation and amortisation figures which totaled £595,000. For a company with a market cap of just £3.06 million,these distortions have temporarily taken an unjustified toll on the share price. Massively cheap then at the current 10-12 pence quote. A (likely)significant uplift in revenues and profitability through the current year should see the current share price doubling(conservativ IMO | mudbath | |
21/10/2014 12:11 | Ken Ford needs to go, so far he has failed shareholders miserably with his projections, holders are facing large losses due too his total incompetence, he should do the honourable thing and accept that he is not up to the job! | wormhasturned | |
31/5/2014 14:35 | Glad I sold this in April! Cant see that, absent any new news, this becomes interesting until it gets down to about 12p | adamb1978 | |
20/5/2014 17:36 | Thoughts may be of interesthttp://www.p | hastings | |
20/5/2014 09:17 | Ford sounds like a fanny merchant, holding these but he never seems to be able to meet expectations, needs to go, SDI needs a CE. who is able to deliver. Shareholders have suffered enough! | bookbroker | |
15/5/2014 12:29 | Artemis CCD Ltd Announces New Distribution http://www.biospace. | nick2008 | |
10/4/2014 08:16 | Sold my very small holding in these as well over the last couple weeks. Main reason being that when I looked at what I thought might play out over H2 and then drive the full year figures, I didn't think it looked that great. Lets assuming that H2 turnover rises 3% year on year from their very strong H2 last year, that's a 14% rise half of half in FY14 - there very much in line with the comments at the interims re performance being second half weighted. Even with that assumptions, I get EPS of about 1.1p so a PE of around 19x. Given that that will only be EPS growth of about 9% based on my figures, I cant see Mr Market saying that paying 19x for a sub-10% growth company is right, let along cheap. Could see myself buying back into these if the share prices drops to mid-teens but I just don't see any upside from current levels over the next year. I just cant see how it will re-rate to say 25x current year. I COULD however see upside if they deliver 1.1p EPS this year and then the next interims give shareholders confidence that they can deliver 5%-10% top line growth in 2015 as, with the operational gearing, that might mean they deliver 2p EPS in 2015 and then this starts to look cheap. However turnover was £7.2m in 2010 and in 2014 it looks like it might be only around £7.5m so I don't think people will naturally give management the benefit of the doubt that they can grow this - this need to actually achieve some growth Adam | adamb1978 | |
10/4/2014 07:49 | BP Pension fund selling down - Initial take NEGATIVE. Message received the Investment Management of the pension fund have concluded that growth and profit will not meet their objectives. | pugugly | |
17/3/2014 12:33 | Let's hope those stunning broadcasts from the Space Station last night might enthuse a legion of stargazers into acquiring some of these fancy optics this co. produces! | bookbroker | |
14/3/2014 07:51 | News this morning - Scientific Digital Imaging Plc Expansion of Imaging Systems rangeTIDMSDIScientif | nick2008 | |
05/3/2014 18:30 | Think the Silverdell mention is a cheap shot - not much a broker can do if a company turns out to have lied to them as well as the market | adamb1978 | |
05/3/2014 10:52 | Thaanks, I'll do that! f | fillipe | |
05/3/2014 09:40 | Not sure if I would trust Finncap, after the Silverdell debacle one ought to take anything they state with a pinch of salt! | bookbroker | |
05/3/2014 09:33 | The shares are much too lowly priced at the present time. House broker, FinnCap 03/03/2014 CORP. 2014 eps 3.80p 2015 eps 4.00p Year ends are 30th April, so not long to go. I wouldn't be surprised to see a 50p tp here if the 2014 numbers above are confirmed. f | fillipe | |
05/3/2014 08:40 | bookbroker. I feel confident that the SDI share price will soon surpass that recent high at which you wished you had sold. Stick with these for a rewarding couple of years imo. | mudbath | |
28/2/2014 09:55 | Not are why this co. on the acquisition trail, haven't they got enough on their plate trying to eke out profits from existing businesses, looks to me a defensive move, share price telling us that here is another co. that management seem to be looking after themselves rather than shareholders. | bookbroker | |
26/2/2014 08:28 | Thing is, can this management do that, are they capable, they disappointed badly last year, is this recent acquisition a defensive one, this was driven up on the placing, now the reality, they have been talking the talk, now they gotta walk the walk, those forecasts look somewhat optimistic on the basis of last year, I see this management as prone to gaffes, wished I had sold last of holding last week, this is one co. that the directors should look at the share price to gauge their performance, seeing as I'm sure they are more than adequately remunerated! | bookbroker |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions