Savannah Resources Share Discussion Threads

[fqr714bhp] 25/9/2019 09:34

MR: DAVID ARCHER.


SELL SAV NOW AND DO IT QUICKLY BEFORE YOU GET ZERO £ FOR IT.


RIP.

[fqr714bhp] 25/9/2019 09:34

MR: DAVID ARCHER.


SELL SAV NOW AND DO IT QUICKLY BEFORE YOU GET ZERO £ FOR IT.


RIP.

[fqr714bhp] 25/9/2019 09:34

MR: DAVID ARCHER.


SELL SAV NOW AND DO IT QUICKLY BEFORE YOU GET ZERO £ FOR IT.


RIP.

[fqr714bhp] 25/9/2019 09:34

MR: DAVID ARCHER.


SELL SAV NOW AND DO IT QUICKLY BEFORE YOU GET ZERO £ FOR IT.


RIP.

[fqr714bhp] 25/9/2019 09:34

MR: DAVID ARCHER.


SELL SAV NOW AND DO IT QUICKLY BEFORE YOU GET ZERO £ FOR IT.


RIP.

[fqr714bhp] 25/9/2019 09:34

MR: DAVID ARCHER.


SELL SAV NOW AND DO IT QUICKLY BEFORE YOU GET ZERO £ FOR IT.


RIP.

[fqr714bhp] 25/9/2019 09:34

MR: DAVID ARCHER.


SELL SAV NOW AND DO IT QUICKLY BEFORE YOU GET ZERO £ FOR IT.


RIP.

[ged5] 25/9/2019 09:20

I've updated the header today. Note that one of the biggest shareholders has bought just over 3m in the last placing.

[ged5] 25/9/2019 09:17

Unfortunately DA has lost credibility. Time and time again he has been overoptimistic with his guidelines. There were some who had wild dreams of very high returns here. Now those dreams are little more than miraculous because of this ridiculously low price fund raise.

The way I look at it now is that the mkt cap has always been around 50m on the basis of the assets and the eventual EV revolution. It will happen and the price of lithium will rise. Remember HSBC and one of the Morgan's shorting silver and telling us allsorts. Isn't silver doing well now? These things are short lived so the canny can make money.

So my strategy is buy around these prices and look for a rise back to about the 50m mkt cap. The share price would be about 6p a great return and in fairly short order imo, especially if for once the DFS comes in on the new schedule.

Yes a good RNS but for another day.

[fqr714bhp] 25/9/2019 08:21

UKGeorge

IT is because DA knows he will NOT be RE-ELECTED.

A good RNS this morning.

It just proves that the damage has been done, no share price move upwards.

This company will become a RIP

LOL.

[jotoha2] 25/9/2019 08:15

DA clearly has skin in the game , so his interests are aligned with the common man , but its the speed of progress that is the issue , market agrees !

[ukgeorge] 25/9/2019 08:03

"The Board is committed to serving the interests of its shareholders"

interesting rns strange that this is in there.

[seagullsslimjim] 22/9/2019 10:18

the same people who do the miles per gallon tests and tape over radiator grills, door mirrors and with minimal fuel to lessen the weight ! ;-)

[ged5] 21/9/2019 12:21

Thanks Teemore, I'll read yours later, Paleje.

Article in The Times this morning on flawed testing of battery ranges. They test at 23 degrees. They don't take into account heating or air conditioning.

Who employs these people?

[fqr714bhp] 21/9/2019 09:50

SONY BETAMAX was actually a much better quality product than VHS, but VHS won the day.
SONY had the last word in the end and won with BluRay.

[jotoha2] 21/9/2019 09:15

Just viewed the last interview , uming and ahring , not a lot of substance , and what is this about subdued markets , utter rubbish , the share price is where it is because of the mans inability to progress further , what a waffler.

[paleje] 21/9/2019 07:54

Bit of a read, 23 mins, but a good overall view on the auto industry with EV prominent throughout. A notable point early on in the article is that the actual method of delivering the clean power is still not clear, lithium batteries or hydrogen fuel cells. I have read recently that some months ago China stepped up work on the hydrogen option but I can't re-find the article. Anyone who remembers the betamax/VHS race will know certs aren't always certs.

[teemore] 20/9/2019 10:12

Good article from another site about Lithium (from another company which has yet no licences for exploration)

The rapid growth in battery-powered electric vehicles (EVs) to circa 4 vehicles worldwide, albeit from a small base, is generating high demand growth for scarce minerals with which our group is familiar – especially battery-grade lithium and cobalt – as well as vanadium, zinc, and copper. EVs are still an enigma: electric motors are efficient converters of power into torque, but power must be generated and transmitted.

Electric cars offer advantages: it is far easier to build state-of-the-art electric motors than petrol or Diesel internal combustion engines (ICEs). Electric motors generate maximum torque immediately – though tyres take time to grip, as with conventional vehicles. Electric motors are far more efficient (<90%) than Internal Combustion Engines (35% - 50%) but the electricity must first be generated (typically 30% to 55% efficiency) and transmitted and/or stored – which is typically only about 70% efficient. So much energy is lost by all vehicle types.

Power storage remains the key problem: existing battery technologies are inefficient, heavy, and expensive. But faster and more efficient charging technologies are being developed.

For the fast growth electric vehicles and electronic devices market, ‘Lithium ion technology’ is the best economically feasible solution developed so far, though it has ‘only’ tripled its performance since 1992. As the lightest metal, lithium contains comparable energy potential to petrol. Safety requires the dilution of lithium into lithium salts, and the addition of cobalt to render the release and recharge of the batteries safe. Compared to alternatives, lithium ion technologies offer a weight advantage.

The appeal of electric vehicles is that they are emission-free at the point of use – though the electricity must be generated and transmitted. There is also storage capacity in EVs (including buses & taxis). But stationary batteries share the same efficiency loss (>30% loss) - which is aggravated if you expend energy moving storage batteries around.

NB Using braking power to charge is a good concept but a long journey away at this stage- you cannot put 'the cart before the horse'

[ged5] 20/9/2019 09:53

Thanks IB, let's hope so. Any links?

Explanation of EIA for the locals put on the website today:-

[inbrackets] 20/9/2019 07:51

Extract from article from Benchmark on 3 tiers of battery manufacturers"Typically, manufacturers in the higher tiers follow a more stringent qualification process for sourcing raw materials. This results in higher quality and specification requirements, large sample sizes, and longer qualification times."Don't we know it,nut couple this with Amazons huge fleet order with Rivian, And Daimlers capitulation to EVs and maybe the bottom has been reached.

[broncowarrior] 19/9/2019 23:19

My mate David lost his id Now we just call him Dav.

[fqr714bhp] 19/9/2019 20:19

Hi Sam

Regenerative braking is not the answer either, that is F1 technology for more power/speed.

There needs to be a kind of belt driven alternator on each wheel which produces re-chargeable constant electric for charging Lithium batteries.

Then there would be unlimited miles driving and not have to worry about no sun on any solar panel roof contraption.

A belt driven alternator on each wheel does not reduce speed or power.

IMHO.