ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

SDG Sanderson Design Group Plc

106.00
-1.50 (-1.40%)
17 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Sanderson Design Group Plc LSE:SDG London Ordinary Share GB0003061511 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -1.50 -1.40% 106.00 105.00 110.00 108.00 107.50 107.50 289,473 16:35:18
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Convrt Paper,paperbd Pds,nec 108.64M 8.2M 0.1143 9.41 77.08M
Sanderson Design Group Plc is listed in the Convrt Paper,paperbd Pds sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SDG. The last closing price for Sanderson Design was 107.50p. Over the last year, Sanderson Design shares have traded in a share price range of 97.00p to 130.00p.

Sanderson Design currently has 71,706,225 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Sanderson Design is £77.08 million. Sanderson Design has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 9.41.

Sanderson Design Share Discussion Threads

Showing 1401 to 1424 of 1825 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  61  60  59  58  57  56  55  54  53  52  51  50  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
21/1/2023
00:08
Was it a buy or a sell - I guess it would have been perhaps a delayed sale as the price dropped near the close
salver2
20/1/2023
23:30
According to LSE the 500k trade was "unknown" as bang on the mid price post closing auction - either a buy or a sell on the books.
disc0dave45
20/1/2023
22:55
Whoever bought the 500,000 at close today doesn't expect a poor trading update. We'll soon see.
barnesian
20/1/2023
22:22
A dump of that amount at 113p almost suggests that someone big suspects a poor trading update and either taking a smallish profit or protecting against s further downturn. If this in the case probable retest of the 100p - 90p area.
pugugly
20/1/2023
17:25
For every seller there is a buyer that's how the market works. MMs always play with the price every year prior to the trading statement and this year is no different. They will be selling this much higher once the statement comes. Got to take advantage and buy the dips works every time.
trt
20/1/2023
16:51
Someone looks as though they’ve dumped over half a million pounds worth of shares
salver2
20/1/2023
14:09
I like essential would think a merger between Cfx and Sanderson would be a good fit -basically the two biggest upmarket players in the sector
salver2
20/1/2023
14:06
Cheers for that, worth having the confirmation.
hastings
20/1/2023
14:00
Hastings, CFX do not manufacture any of their own product to be best of my knowledge: Salver could clarify.

It's a key difference between the two respective businesses.


A merger may be a thing of beauty. I also hold CFX, only fair to mention.

essentialinvestor
20/1/2023
13:38
The Ruggable website (UK as well as USA), doesn't as yet list any collaboration with SDG regarding any Morris & Co designs. Thought it was to start this year - know it's early.Also, interesting that Ruggable already do quite a large portfolio of "Disney" themed rugs.
disc0dave45
20/1/2023
13:10
Colefax are positioned generally at the very highest end and most of their revenue around 60 percent comes from the Usa
salver2
20/1/2023
13:06
I found it interesting that SDG prints wallpaper for Colefax. I'd assumed they'd got their own facility.
hastings
20/1/2023
12:53
Stripping out the cash these are on a pe of 6 time’s earnings -a pitiful valuation in my opinion but the sector is fairly unloved-Colefax also on about 6 times stripping out cash also pitiful their results are out in a week or so and we’ll start to get some idea also when Sanderson issue a trading update in a couple of weeks or so
salver2
20/1/2023
12:12
Cheers for the comments and you make a very valid point on flat earnings and valuation based on the next year. I believe the EPS figure is somewhere similar to the year ending, so you are correct in my view. That said, I do feel the strength of the balance sheet and large net cash position factored in add to that somewhat though.Also, margins have been strong via Morris and the licensing.The US is obviously where a potentially big opportunity is in play though, so hopefully they can accelerate that once headwinds ease and also drive the Disney angle, which as you point out has prospects.Impressed by the CEO and the potential here, but obviously we will hear more come the update.
hastings
20/1/2023
11:36
Hastings - very good synopsis of the company’s history, interesting, particularly the archived documents which could be the key to a step change in earnings?. Wasn’t it RWS who recently discovered they had thousands of IP addresses they didn’t know they had which were worth millions.
Edit 22/1/23 - apologies it was RM not RWS
I still feel that currently until they’ve actually proven the monetisation potential of their massive archived documents (wow 200k not 75k), that earnings are fairly flat. Their broker forecasts 13.9p eps which seems achievable but from memory the forecasts for FY24 and FY25 are 14.1p and 13.8p respectively. So basically flat growth and that’s my main concern, the licensing appears to be the main growth potential and I guess until the Disney collaboration actually demonstrates what that potential is then it’s going nowhere IMO. H1 NAV was 115p, pre covid the PE rating was 5x to 10x, so single digit seems fair value IMO, and at mid 8x that’s circa 112p.
I’m starting to come to the view though that this does have significant growth potential but the Disney collaboration has as yet not indicated what that could be, and it will be another year until we possibly know (do these things take circa 18 months and why?).

disc0dave45
19/1/2023
18:51
Post 1398"Course you did" pmsl
disc0dave45
18/1/2023
23:53
With dyslexia typos are an old friend of mine!, we are very well acquainted.
essentialinvestor
18/1/2023
23:00
No worries. I normally let this sort of stuff pass, but I thought Pug deserved a word of support.

PS I know you can't be expected to fix all of it, at least not without professional help, but at least the very first sentence? 'there is surely one particular stand out from the crowd'? A sentence without an object must be beyond the pale, even in these benighted times?

supernumerary
18/1/2023
22:06
Thank you, Supernumerary for your positive critique and your kind conclusion, much appreciated.
hastings
18/1/2023
21:34
'I think your eyesight has eluded you Pug?'

Did you mean 'deluded'? I'm not sure eyesight can elude :¬( I'm not even sure it can delude or allude - just making the best of a bad job :¬)

Pug - you were of course quite right - good to see it's now corrected - but there were so many typos and solecisms in the article, it seems unfair to single out just one. Never mind, the content was interesting, which I guess is what counts.

supernumerary
18/1/2023
18:32
Nice we are rowing together ?
hastings
18/1/2023
18:29
Hi - Used elude in the sense of missed your attention - "has somewhat alluded my attention" Which is what I think you were trying to say. However quibbling over semantics no way detracts from a most useful and interesting article.

However for the record sold out at 232 in September 2021 and now on rebuy? watch list.

pugugly
18/1/2023
18:19
I think your eyesight has eluded you Pug?
hastings
18/1/2023
18:11
hastings - great article but did you not mean eluded rather than alluded - not using dictation software by any chance?
pugugly
Chat Pages: Latest  61  60  59  58  57  56  55  54  53  52  51  50  Older