ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

SDG Sanderson Design Group Plc

52.50
0.00 (0.00%)
05 Feb 2025 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Stock Type
Sanderson Design Group Plc SDG London Ordinary Share
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Last Trade
0.00 0.00% 52.50 07:32:55
Open Price Low Price High Price Close Price Previous Close
52.50 52.50 52.50 52.50 52.50
more quote information »
Industry Sector
HOUSEHOLD GOODS & HOME CONSTRUCTION

Sanderson Design SDG Dividends History

Announcement Date Type Currency Dividend Amount Ex Date Record Date Payment Date
16/10/2024InterimGBP0.00524/10/202425/10/202429/11/2024
24/04/2024FinalGBP0.027511/07/202412/07/202409/08/2024
11/10/2023InterimGBP0.007519/10/202320/10/202324/11/2023
26/04/2023FinalGBP0.027513/07/202314/07/202311/08/2023
11/10/2022InterimGBP0.007527/10/202228/10/202225/11/2022
28/04/2022FinalGBP0.027514/07/202215/07/202212/08/2022
13/10/2021InterimGBP0.007521/10/202122/10/202126/11/2021

Top Dividend Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 23/1/2025 16:24 by velocytongo
CFX have managed their brands more effectively and have quietly and slowly built a good US business. I don’t know about SDG but without the licensing deal the company wld be hemorrhaging cash.
Posted at 22/1/2025 19:11 by cjohn
SDG has cropped up on my deep value screen.

However, the CEO's disgustingly high pay package not only hits the bottom line, but also reveals a serious issue with governance. Why aren't the audit committee and the NEDS doing their duty?

Where's the respect for the Company owners?
Posted at 22/1/2025 08:38 by edmondj
In fairness, CFX's numbers are to 31 Oct, the downturn at SDG came later and in particular first two weeks January for the UK. Chairman makes the important point re. potential US tariffs which would affect both companies if more so CFX:

"The Group has delivered a good performance in the first six months due to a strong Fabric Division performance in the US. Market conditions in the UK and Europe are currently challenging and we expect these conditions to continue through the second half of the year. Following the US election in November the US Dollar exchange rate has strengthened significantly and if sustained this will be beneficial for Fabric Division profits going forward. Although trading prospects in the US look favourable there is currently significant uncertainty around the possibility of higher US import tariffs and how they might impact our US business."
Posted at 22/1/2025 08:10 by salver2
The board at SDG would do well to examine these figures excellent results just published by Colefax- they have just equaled fully year consensus near enough just in first half
Posted at 20/1/2025 10:57 by mr5k
If you back out of the £10m licensing, which will be nearly 100% GM and accounts for £10m sales, SDG is losing cash and profits on the rest of the business.

There is no one with the necessary business background at the NED level and there is a pay problem with the Chair on £120k and the CEO taking home £600k.

Glad I'm not a shareholder and just hoping that CFX gets the chance to pick up some of the brands at bargain prices.
Posted at 17/1/2025 19:49 by cliffpeat
Design and "taste" is subjective - but visiting the SDG web site for the first time in ages, I was very disappointed. Nothing "inspired" and no "wow" factor on the landing pages any of the collection of brands. But - of course - that is subjective view.

It seems to me that there might be "closed-circle bias" happening here.

From a business point of view, it is generally accepted that you need to concentrate on the likes, desires and whims of your target market audience. Perhaps that is what they are doing - but has the management identified a large enough target market?

Fresh (and hard-nosed) senior management is probably required. At present there seems to be too much "Bambi" and not enough "Banksy".

As others have suggested, this company needs a shake up if it is to exploit the heritage of the brands and manufacturing potentials. I've lost too much on my small holding to care very much - my guess is that one day it will probably be acquired.

Just opinion and as ever, DYOR.
Posted at 23/12/2024 08:11 by salver2
Apologies for that I was trying to kill two birds with one stone -if you strip out Colefax cash it is on a pe of about 7 - too cheap in my opinion- as to SDG which has a very similar market cap it is also cheap as it is stuffed full of juicy assets and as a direct comparison should on a pe of 7 ( ex cash) be making about 5 million after tax which even they should manage to do - hopefully this will be a cyclical low
Posted at 22/12/2024 21:16 by velocytongo
Industrial land is worth what other industrial buyers are prepared to pay and that is not much at the moment. I add agree SDG is very cheap.
Posted at 22/12/2024 20:59 by salver2
Colefax lest it not be forgotten also have about 18 million of cash - their factory in Loughborough and Milton Keynes warehouses (SDG that is)must be worth a lot plus their Lancashire factory (standfast and barracks) occupies an enormous 9 acre site add in the cash and all the intellectual rights of William Morris and Sanderson and the the market is valuing the whole shebang at less than what was paid for Clarke and Clarke
Posted at 19/6/2024 12:40 by rivaldo
Bought just a few here on the dip for the first time to keep me interested here - SDG has been on my watchlist for years.

Today's research note from Singer seems to clarify matters succinctly, with a £6m-£7m benefit to NPV (though there is still a triennial review currently underway at the remaining Walker Greenbank scheme):

Extracts:

"SDG has announced the transfer of liabilities in one of its two legacy DB pension schemes. This is the smaller of the two. While the triennial review is currently underway at the remaining scheme, annual deficit recovery payments will roughly halve vs. the £2.5m p.a. it pays in currently. The cash cost of the agreement is £2.3m and, after related admin/advisory costs totalling c£0.7m, this should deliver a benefit with a c£6-7m NPV."

"SDG has announced an agreement with the Trustees of the Abaris Holdings Limited Pension Scheme which enables the group to transfer the scheme’s risks to an insurer. The Abaris Scheme is the smaller of two legacy defined benefit pension schemes, with 59 retirees and 60 deferred participants. The scheme was in deficit. In addition to receiving the Abaris Scheme’s existing investments, the agreed cash amount, SDG has paid the insurer £2.3m in cash to transfer the risks to the insurer under a buy-in insurance policy investment. Scheme administration and advisory costs, which are estimated to be c£0.7m in total, will also be paid by SDG over the life of the pension scheme. This is likely to be over a period of roughly 18-24 months. These ongoing admin costs will not impact adjusted PBT."

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock