Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Rpc Group Plc LSE:RPC London Ordinary Share GB0007197378 ORD 5P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 792.60 0.00 01:00:00
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
792.40 792.60 0.00 0.00 0.00
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
General Industrials 3,747.70 316.60 61.60 12.9 3,248
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
- O 0 792.60 GBX

Rpc (RPC) Latest News

More Rpc News
Rpc Takeover Rumours

Rpc (RPC) Discussions and Chat

Rpc (RPC) Most Recent Trades

No Trades
Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Rpc trades in real-time

Rpc (RPC) Top Chat Posts

Rpc Daily Update: Rpc Group Plc is listed in the General Industrials sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker RPC. The last closing price for Rpc was 792.60p.
Rpc Group Plc has a 4 week average price of 0p and a 12 week average price of 0p.
The 1 year high share price is 800p while the 1 year low share price is currently 784.80p.
There are currently 409,738,770 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 0 shares. The market capitalisation of Rpc Group Plc is £3,247,589,491.02.
phillis: whizzer Whilst we wait for the last rites explain your post if you will (can) "A Share-Swap is not a cash transaction, it is a synergy risk which in this instance is shared by Berry and RPC. The ratio difference between the Berry share price and the RPC share price is then applied to the share exchange between the two companies. The £8 sale referred to in P/N 3471 IMOP is a share exchange and not a cash sale.) "
billywhizz1: Can't see an answer offered to my post 3487, so I'll give one: A Share-Swap is not a cash transaction, it is a synergy risk which in this instance is shared by Berry and RPC. The ratio difference between the Berry share price and the RPC share price is then applied to the share exchange between the two companies. The £8 sale referred to in P/N 3471 IMOP is a share exchange and not a cash sale.
sogoesit: From BearBull in the IC: Title: Ignoring Apollo. “When a master of the universe speaks, you listen. It’s not just that the New York-based private-equity firm Apollo Global (US:APO) names itself after Greek mythology’s most important god; it’s more that the $250bn (£192bn) fund manager was founded by a real ‘master of the universe’ – Leon Black, a legendary figure in the US finance industry, although certainly not a mythical one, who was the right hand of Michael Milken, the 1980s junk-bond king. While Mr Milken ended up in prison, Mr Black founded Apollo and became even more fabulously wealthy than his one-time mentor. Thus Apollo spake unto the directors of the UK’s second-biggest packaging group, RPC (RPC), who were keen to sell their company. Apollo said it would make a distinctly low-ball offer – 782p a share in cash; but they had better take it or leave it because it was the only one the firm would make. RPC’s directors gave a breathless “oh yes, please” and recommended Apollo’s offer. This has hacked off some of RPC’s institutional shareholders because the offer does look pretty unexciting. However, there is now a second suitor talking to the maker of stuff such as bottles for Heinz tomato ketchup and tins for Dulux paints – Berry Global (US:BERY), a packaging group floated by Apollo in 2012 and in which it still has a stake. The background is the directors’ conviction that RPC must grow by acquisition. And the clear inference in their unconvincing recommendation of Apollo’s offer is that they feel that listed status shackles the group. Or, as they put it, “differing investor views on the appropriate level of leverage have been a constraint on RPC’s opportunities and growth”. Without a counterfactual, we can never know, yet that statement does not readily tally with the facts. These past five years RPC has binged on acquisitions. It’s hard to imagine that its bosses could have done more without biting off more than they could chew. Spending on acquisitions has dwarfed any other category of capital allocation, especially its internal equivalent, growth by capital spending. In the five years to 2013-18, capex totalled a bit more than depreciation – £680m against £574m – but that compares with almost £2.1bn cash spent on acquisitions. Meanwhile, almost all the funds for this growth were sourced externally. Cumulatively, RPC generated free cash of just £327m in that period while it raised just over £2bn in almost equal amounts of debt and equity. Clearly, this leveraging has had the desired effect on performance. RPC has become a more productive beast – in 2017-18, gross profits per employee were 13 per cent higher than five years earlier even though employee numbers had more than tripled. In the same period, revenues rose by the same proportion while pre-tax profits quintupled to £317m and basic earnings quadrupled to 62p. Even the dividend, whose movements should be comparatively staid yet reliable, doubled to 28p. True, free cash – arguably the best long-term measure of profitability – is lagging. It came in at 35p per share in 2017-18, barely more than half the accounting earnings figure. It is feasible to ascribe that to RPC’s acquisition-driven growth, sucking working capital, interest and cash taxes out of the group. Yet even free cash has been moving strongly in the right direction. In increments of approaching £50m a year, it went from nothing to £145m in the three years to 2017-18. Besides, there is nothing wrong with RPC’s basic aim of growing by acquisition. On the contrary, in a low-growth industry such as packaging, where fixed costs are high and economies of scale especially powerful, it seems the one to pursue. So why do RPC’s bosses seem so miffed? Quite likely because the share price has responded indifferently to their efforts. At its current 793p, it is 26 per cent lower than its peak two years ago. That said, it is still 50 per cent higher than it was five years ago, which compares with a gain of just 11 per cent from the FTSE All-Share index. Not surprisingly, they see the solution in the arms of private equity where they can run RPC “without the costs, constraints and distractions associated with being a listed company”, as they say in the offer document. And there is the point – which somehow doesn’t get mentioned in the document – that they may well have the prospect of making even more moolah with RPC being private-equity owned than as a listed company. Yet this brings little benefit to the people who currently employ them – RPC’s shareholders. All that Apollo’s bid offers them is a miserly 14 per cent uplift on the share price immediately before the directors announced they were in bid talks last September and an exit earnings multiple way below the average of RPC’s global peer group – 10.7 times forecast earnings against 14 times. True, the arrival of Berry Global may improve the exit returns, but don’t expect a bidding war – as Apollo’s offer is final it can’t be raised without special permission from the Takeover Panel. In which case, RPC’s shareholders may have to make the best of a bad job. That would mean persuading New-York-listed Berry Global to include an equity component in any offer it makes, which would allow them to share in the future gains accruing from RPC’s acquisition strategy. Failing that, they should tell RPC’s bosses to stop whingeing, get on with the good work and don’t listen to masters of the universe.“
whatsyourgame: Michael Pooler - Financial Times 31 January 2019 "Berry Global Group, the US plastic packaging company, is seeking to gatecrash the £3.3bn takeover of its UK competitor RPC by a private equity firm. Berry revealed on Thursday that it was considering a cash offer for the FTSE 250 manufacturer, one of Europe’s largest plastic packaging makers, and had requested diligence information. The news comes just over a week after RPC recommended a cash offer from Apollo Global Management, following more than four months of talks and just hours before the expiry of a deadline for the bidder to make its intentions clear.  However two major shareholders, Aviva Investors and Royal London Asset Management, criticised the bid as undervaluing the company.  Apollo’s final offer of 782p for each RPC share is a 15.6 per cent premium on the stock’s closing price on September 7, the last day before discussions with Apollo were confirmed. Some analysts said it was low, but discounted the idea of an alternative buyer emerging so late in the process. Shares in RPC rose 3.7 per cent on Thursday to 795p as investors digested the possibility of a higher bid.  Indiana-based Berry said there was no certainty it would make an offer. “A competing offer from an industry player such as Berry, at a premium to the current valuation can be justified, in our view, offering scope for an enhanced offer for shareholders,” said Kevin Fogarty, an analyst at Numis.  RPC confirmed it had received Berry’s request for information, adding that it would engage with its new suitor in accordance with the takeover code and “in the interests of delivering best value to shareholders”. The UK-based company makes plastic products such as bottle tops, paint pots and asthma inhalers and has grown rapidly through a series of deals to reach annual turnover of £3.75bn. But questions over its ability to convert profits into cash, and concerns about the impact of tougher rules on plastic packaging, have weighed on its share price over the past year. Until December, it was also in talks with another private equity group, Bain Capital. Berry, which supplies products including prescription vials, drinks cups and tapes and generated revenues of $7.1bn in 2017, was owned by Apollo before it was floated in 2012."
whatsyourgame: The RPC share price is holding up at 766p this morning, just about 2% shy of the offer price, pretty much affirming that thus far the market sees the offer succeeding as is. What we, the refuseniks, now require is for another couple of sizeable institutional shareholders to go public in rubbishing the offer terms.
snowydays: By Ben Dummett and Miriam Gottfried Updated Jan. 21, 2019 12:37 p.m. ET Private-equity giant Apollo Global Management APO 2.40% LLC is in advanced talks to acquire RPC Group RPC 0.25% PLC, one of Europe’s biggest packaging companies, for more than $3.8 billion, according to people familiar with the matter. A deal could be announced as soon as Tuesday, marking the culmination of a protracted negotiation against the backdrop of mounting uncertainty over divorce talks between the European Union and the U.K., where RPC is based. Some bankers have suggested that political uncertainty and the resultant stock and currency-market volatility could crimp deal-making in the U.K., making it trickier for buyers and sellers to agree on a sale price. But the Apollo-RPC agreement offers further evidence that this view may be overly pessimistic for private-equity firms. Earlier this month, buyout firm Clayton Dubilier & Riceagreed to purchase a majority of U.K. catering operator WSH Investments Ltd. for $1 billion, including debt. The expected deal for RPC comes as the world’s major buyout firms are under pressure to invest the record amounts of cash they have raised to collect lucrative fees from their investors. In 2017, Apollo raised $24.56 billion for the largest-ever buyout fund. RPC, which designs and makes plastic packaging for food, beverage, personal-care and other sectors, first disclosed in September that it was in talks with both Apollo and buyout rival Bain Capital about a possible sale. Bain withdrew from the bidding in early December. Out-of-favor publicly traded companies or their divisions are often attractive targets as their relatively large size allows the cash-rich PE firms to invest the funds expeditiously to start generating returns. Last year, private-equity firms in Europe spent $61.1 billion on acquiring publicly traded companies—the largest annual sum since 2007, according to Dealogic. Driven largely by acquisitions, RPC grew revenue by 36% to £3.75 billion ($4.83 billion) for the year ended March 31, 2018, from the prior period, while net profit rose 92% to £253.4 million. Still, the company’s free cash flow fell 4% over that time, helping to explain RPC’s weak stock-price despite its earnings and profit growth. Investors have also been worried that efforts by the European Union to clampdown on plastic waste would reduce demand for RPC products. RPC, which employs about 24,000 people globally and operates in more than 33 countries, has said it doesn’t make any of the products that the EU is targeting. Before it first disclosed possible sale talks in September, RPC’s stock had declined 22% last year. It then jumped as investors bet on a deal, but it has since languished as talks with Apollo dragged amid political turmoil in the U.K. that increased the risk of no deal. That share-price weakness, though, represents an opportunity for Apollo if it can overcome the manufacturer’s challenges. Apollo’s offer price couldn’t be learned. On Thursday, RPC’s stock recently traded in London at £7.29, giving it a market value of £2.96 billion ($3.8 billion) and the private-equity firm is expected to pay a small premium to that level. The RPC deal isn’t particularly big for Apollo, but the acquisition will somewhat ease the pressure that the buyout firm is under to invest its cash hoard after dropping out of some auction processes for big acquisitions. Last year, Apollo withdrew from the bidding for the specialty chemicals business of Dutch paints maker Akzo Nobel NV, which a Carlyle Group LP-led group acquired in a €10.1 billion ($11.49 billion). Write to Ben Dummett at and Miriam Gottfried at
snowydays: Jeffian, the link was to an article dated 27 Dec which I thought might be of interest to some people. I note that the full article might not appear for some readers so I will copy it below. ,....................... Apollo Global Management has been given another extension to make a formal offer for plastic packaging specialist RPC Group (RPC). The private equity group now has until 18 January to table a bid, with RPC noting that Apollo’s “due diligence is now substantially complete”, so it’s conceivable that an offer could emerge prior to that date. RPC:LSE RPC Group PLC 1mth Today change 1.57% Price (GBP) 647.40 If a formal offer is tabled, it could flush out rival bids, particularly if it’s perceived as a low-ball approach. And despite the continued furore in the western media over the industry’s links to maritime pollution, the push towards consolidation shows little sign of abating with commercial incentives still intact – and expanding. Market research from Radiant Insights shows the global rigid plastic packaging market growing at a compound annual rate of 5.57 per cent through 2018-2022, as “applications are rising enormously across the globe”, primarily due to the rapid growth in the e-commerce sector. Another significant factor is the increasing demand for pharmaceutical products among Asia’s rapidly expanding middle classes. None of this would have gone unnoticed by the private equity industry. By now, you would imagine that any financial permutations arising from European directives on packaging recycling rates and the phasing-out of ‘single-use217; plastic packaging would be factored into share prices, though government commitments remain suitably woolly at this point. Nevertheless, it’s reasonable to assume that regulatory risks are increasing and will have a greater impact on valuations than in previous years. IC View Even so, what you might ascribe as ‘fair value’ to RPC shares rather depends on whether you concur with the criticism of the group’s accounting treatment levelled by Northern Trust Capital Markets in 2017. Certainly, as Peel Hunt notes, the group’s forward price/earnings and cash-profit multiples are significantly adrift of the implied rates from Amcor’s (ASX: AMC) $5.25bn (£4.14bn) bid for US packager Bemis Co (NYSE: BMS). And we have also witnessed a step-up in the number of short positions on the stock. But the fact that Apollo is still in the mix, having had access to due diligence materials for an extended period, suggests that it doesn’t perceive any glaring anomalies within the numbers. So, shareholders should sit tight for the moment, as any formal approach is likely to be at a marked premium to the current share price of 654p, an undemanding 8.5 times Bloomberg consensus earnings. Hold.
jeffian: Agree absolutely, Phillis, and that's exactly what they should be doing. squidsgone, The share price had been in pretty continuous decline since the highs of early 2017 and by July 2018 it was in danger of going into freefall, plunging to c.£6. Look at the chart below and spot the following. The first unusual statement was made by the Chairman at the AGM Trading Update on 18/7/18 when he made a Delphic allusion to "resolving" the weak share price caused by shareholders not supporting his acquisition strategy. That was widely interpreted as putting the company "in play". This was followed on 22/7 by a Daily Telegraph article reporting major shareholder Standard Life saying the weak share price made RPC vulnerable to a bid. Then on 10/9 we had the 'response to press speculation' RNS talking about "preliminary discussions" which "may or may not" lead to a bid. It buys them time (during which they hopefully continue to pump out the figures and eventually the fundamentals overcome the NT innuendo). Sure, a 'bid talk off' announcement will unsettle the share price but we're now only a month away from the Interims, so they have a chance to show that actual performance outweighs speculation and innuendo. If no bid materialises, it doesn't give "substantiation to NT suggestions". To my mind it would just confirm that it was never on in the first place, as I said at the time.
jonwig: Not a holder, but price now looks interesting! here's the FT Opening Quote e-mail: A regulatory crackdown on single-use plastics, in the UK and in Europe, has raised many questions. Last Wednesday, with much of the City on its half-term holiday, the main one was: “If straws have to be made out of paper from now on, can you still get bendy ones - or will they just go soggy?” A very good question - and one that stumped this commentator. But, today, with FTSE 250 packaging group RPC reporting full-year results, it’s more a case of: will its profits and revenues hold up… or will they just go soggy? And, this morning, RPC has not been stumped. It has reported a 36 per cent rise in revenues, driven by acquisitions, which led to a commensurate 36 per cent rise in adjusted pre-tax profit, to £389m. Its most recent deal was the €75m acquisition of Nordfolien, which completed after the year end. On a statutory basis, pre-tax profit actually doubled to £317m - reflecting a “significant reduction in adjusting items” in the past year. But revenues also grew organically, by 2.8 per cent, continuing RPC’s recent record of increasing its sales by around 3 per cent a year, excluding acquisitions. In China, organic revenue growth was 26 per cent, helping to lift revenues outside Europe to £831m, from £384m previously - now 22 per cent of the group total. Cash flow generation was “robust”, too, with net cash flows from operating activities up 40 per cent to £386.7m. But free cash flow was lower than the prior year, at £229m, due to the “non-repeatability of working capital related cash synergies”. Much of this improvement had been expected after a trading update in late March said the positive trading trends outlined in its third quarter update had continued, and revenue for the full year “is expected to have grown significantly versus last year, driven by organic growth and aided by acquisitions, polymer price and foreign exchange tailwinds”. Back then, RPC had also flagged that profitability and cash generation - before and after exceptional items - were set to meet management expectations. However, that was not enough to reverse a 20 per cent fall in RPC’s share price since the end of September, after governments and regulators stepped up their fight against plastic waste. As one of Europe’s largest manufacturers of plastic packaging, the market has expected RPC’s businesses to be directly affected. Recent EU proposals target single-use plastics, such as cutlery and straws, and calls for all plastic bottles to be recycled by 2025. So, today, it is the outlook that investors will be drinking in, not last year’s performance. RPC chief executive Pim Vervaat insisted the group was well placed to benefit from opportunities driven by the recent sustainability trends, and from e-commerce. He said RPC was still expecting “through the cycle underlying organic growth” to be ahead of GDP growth, and adjusted operating profit in the core businesses to improve - but more slowly. RPC expects it be about about £50m higher, but only by the financial year ending March 2021. Some analysts agree. Hargreaves Lansdown reckons that, longer term, RPC’s focus on innovative design should mean it is well placed to weather a more difficult plastics environment. Tougher regulation may even improve its position relative to smaller competitors.
gibson59: Hi, as a complete newcomer to shares... could some explain why RPC share price has fallen today following this morning's announcement?Thanks!
Rpc share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20200331 14:22:32