We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| River Uk Micro Cap Limited | LSE:RMMC | London | Ordinary Share | GG00BNDMJP11 | RED ORD NPV |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 177.50 | 20,111 | 08:00:22 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 175.00 | 180.00 | 177.50 | 174.50 | 177.50 | |
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14:20:03 | O | 14 | 177.85 | GBX |
| Date | Time | Source | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13/12/2024 | 15:00 | UK RNS | River UK Micro Cap Ltd Net Asset Value(s) |
| 12/12/2024 | 15:00 | UK RNS | River UK Micro Cap Ltd Net Asset Value(s) |
| 11/12/2024 | 15:00 | UK RNS | River UK Micro Cap Ltd Net Asset Value(s) |
| 10/12/2024 | 15:00 | UK RNS | River UK Micro Cap Ltd Net Asset Value(s) |
| 09/12/2024 | 15:00 | UK RNS | River UK Micro Cap Ltd Net Asset Value(s) |
| 06/12/2024 | 15:00 | UK RNS | River UK Micro Cap Ltd Net Asset Value(s) |
| 05/12/2024 | 15:00 | UK RNS | River UK Micro Cap Ltd Net Asset Value(s) |
| 04/12/2024 | 15:00 | UK RNS | River UK Micro Cap Ltd Net Asset Value(s) |
| 03/12/2024 | 15:00 | UK RNS | River UK Micro Cap Ltd Net Asset Value(s) |
| 02/12/2024 | 15:00 | UK RNS | River UK Micro Cap Ltd Net Asset Value(s) |
River Uk Micro Cap (RMMC) Share Charts1 Year River Uk Micro Cap Chart |
|
1 Month River Uk Micro Cap Chart |
Intraday River Uk Micro Cap Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29/5/2024 | 08:54 | River & Mercantile UK Micro Caps | 94 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-13 14:20:04 | 177.85 | 14 | 24.90 | O |
| 2024-12-13 13:18:48 | 175.05 | 1,702 | 2,979.35 | O |
| 2024-12-13 12:49:03 | 176.00 | 10,000 | 17,600.00 | O |
| 2024-12-13 12:43:32 | 175.05 | 316 | 553.16 | O |
| 2024-12-13 11:49:36 | 177.85 | 2,809 | 4,995.81 | O |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 23/4/2024 11:02 by tradertrev Can't even buy 1000 shares despite the price rise!! |
Posted at 22/4/2024 13:46 by tradertrev Real price currently is 151-155, but can only buy 1,000. NAV going up, share price going down. Can't continue like that for long! |
Posted at 19/2/2024 12:15 by tightfist The Citywire pitch by George Ensor was IMO a good listen, in economics and Micro-caps in general. He mentioned the on ongoing RMMC spread issue. |
Posted at 28/7/2020 10:15 by mike the mechanic Yes, RMMC is tarred by other small ITs and the wide buy/sell spread. Good to see movement today |
Posted at 04/2/2020 13:26 by a1samu There should be something this fund manager should be able to do to narrow the gap between net asset value and share price like buy back shares if he is unable to pick winners, which the market believes by downgrading substantially the value here!Discount or premium is an indicator as to the prospects of a fund. This fund is habitually under performing and shareholders can only sell the shares at a massive discount! The best solution would be to wind up this fund and return the monies to the shareholders. This is a repeat of Woodford, the Manager having spent all of his cash, sitting om his hands, hoping something will turn up and in the meantime regardless his responsibility towards his shareholders, continues to charge them fees, costs, wages whatever he can get away with! The FCA should step in and liquidate hopeless situations like this, just like they have never done it with Woodford! |
Posted at 15/7/2018 14:05 by tin5866 Having bought this a few months back - when the discount seemed irrationally large - I am wondering if there is much point in continuing to hold it.Compulsory redemption means number of shares held reduces. Buying some more shares means more dealing costs (and shares now more expensive as discount has narrowed - although accepting that share price could go the other way as well). Compulsory redemption is also a nice payday for the manager (performance fee triggered). Any future compulsory redemption (always at NAV) could be when NAV is well below share price. Company will never pay dividends. |
Posted at 13/7/2018 18:58 by westcountryboy The shares are redeemed at the stated price so you are deemed to have sold them at that price and obviously you then have fewer shares. What the share price subsequently does is up to the market. The share price has been depressed recently for other reasons, to do with the forced change of management - perhaps unreasonably (I think so anyway). In the recent past RMMC traded at a premium to NAV which was probably also unreasonable. In general I think a discount of 5-10% to NAV is the most likely share price outcome going forward, assuming the market gets more comfortable with the new management's performance. |
Posted at 13/7/2018 15:08 by dragonsteeth Excuse my ignorance but this “Redemption |
Posted at 08/2/2018 13:06 by riverman77 Unless there is a discount control mechanism in place which seeks to fix the discount at a particular level, discounts & premiums are entirely driven by the demand for the share. Investment trusts typically trade at a discount to nav, but there are a few, such as RMMC until yesterday, that trade on a premium. This is usually due to high level of confidence in the manager and strong performance. The concern here is that the market may no longer attach a premium to the shares until the new manager proves himself. Discounts of 10-15% are not uncommon in the small cap space. I reckon RMMC is now on a 10% discount, but I wouldn't necessarily consider this bargain territory relative to other small cap funds. Given all this I wouldn't be surprised to see this drift to a 15% discount in the near term. |
Posted at 07/2/2018 13:25 by eh9 Personally I believe there are grounds to make a formal complaint to the authorities. This breaks the listing rules the way the info was leaked prior to an rns.I would hold however since new fund manager strong and net assets much above current share prices. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
