Regal Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

[j drama] 07/12/2011 03:39

Spec
Yes at least the production level is stable & slowly increasing.
I'd estimate that at current levels it would generate about $37m revenue / $12m of profit per p.a.

[mstaub] 07/12/2011 01:12

The transaction mentioned is the shares being moved into a special CISinvestment fund which will be made up of several companies which
people can then invest in and hopefully get a nice roi some time in the furure.

Hold ON.

I sell LED lights (light emiting diodes) and LED showers www.ledshowers.co.uk

[j drama] 06/12/2011 23:52

The two people mentioned are actually behind Curzon so I believe it's just a legal thing.

[volkswag] 06/12/2011 19:47

Pass the parcel RNSx2 out this afternoon; price at which transaction undertaken not disclosed

1) Full name of person(s)subject to notification:
Ventura Holdings Ltd

Full name of shareholder(s)if different:
William Frederick Chancellor
Graham Christopher Derricott

Date of transaction 2nd December 2011

Holding reduced from 16% to 0%

2) Full name of person(s)subject to notification:
Curzon Alternative Investments Ltd

Full name of shareholder(s)if different:
Curzon Alternative Investments Ltd
- CIS Natural Resources Fund

Date of transaction 2nd December 2011

Holding increased from 0% to 16%


Could the attached URL be the aforementioned referred Curzon Alternative Investments Ltd

[mam fach] 06/12/2011 13:25

Despite everything the price isnt what it should be.
Being obtuse I am holding on.

[j drama] 05/12/2011 22:22

Sorry to hear that Beeksy, i was fortunate to have a good communication channel with Robert Wilde who dispelled a lot of the lies & rumours being posted here & other websites.

[dw11] 05/12/2011 21:36

This company making $31mil pa. licence back no expensive rigs and cash in bank. Why share price so low?

[beeks of arabia] 05/12/2011 21:16

Around a year now since I was robbed of my RPT shares.

Good ol' Xena. Her scare emails cost me many '000s.

I wonder how many other investors on here were contacted by her and sold at the bottom........

[beeks of arabia] 04/12/2011 16:27

Sorry for the header. Some ramper seems to have hacked it.

Normal service will be resumed asap*

























































*when OCZ hit $15

[jam2day] 03/12/2011 18:28

With the lack of information in the rns we do not know if all the wells are onstream or if the new compressors are being used or even installed?
All in all pretty useless release!

[liquid millionaire] 03/12/2011 16:58

Whose the geez in the header then?

[j drama] 03/12/2011 06:49

To be fair with the actual change in volume there wasn't actually a requirement to release a RNS.
I'm beginning to suspect they are intentionally keeping the production low, but enough to make a profit, to make another low ball offer.

[dw11] 02/12/2011 17:04

And there getting 48% more so that's like 2600 boped b4 shut down. Thing are looking good more income lower costs.

[j drama] 02/12/2011 13:41

Whilst the numbers & detail are disappointing at least we got an update!
Perhaps this will be a regular thing or a result of numerous pestering emails?

The 'please contact' part did make me laugh.

[volkswag] 02/12/2011 13:30

RNS out around 12.30 providing production update:
extract follows: 'The Company's Ukrainian gas and condensate production for the month of October 2011 averaged 212,367 m(3) /d of gas and 49 m(3) /d of condensate (1,632 boepd in aggregate), and for the month of November 2011 averaged 228,799 m(3) /d of gas and 51 m(3) /d of condensate (1,751 boepd in aggregate).'

The Interims released in September mentioned the following which are useful comparisons:
'Production restarted on 22 July 2011. For the 7 day period to 26 September 2011 production averaged 207,205 m(3) /d of gas and 52 m(3) /d of condensate (1,618 boepd in aggregate)'.

This compares with 1,910 boepd in aggregate for the seven days prior to the suspension of operations in the MEX-GOL and SV fields on 17 November 2010.
..................
Whilst the volume for November 2011 was an increase on October's 2011, noting the pre shutdown figure hopefully their is potential to improve further. However further detail around which wells are again producing and which wells are still being commissioned or otherwise would have been useful.

[j drama] 01/12/2011 00:12

Sorry you are right, they did reduce from 14% to 7.5%.If they hadn't the Energees offer wouldn't have gone unconditional.
Where we'd be if that hadn't happened I hate to think.

[kingyon1] 30/11/2011 23:32

That's not what I was told, good luck.

[j drama] 30/11/2011 23:19

Pope didn't sell any shares to Energees, in fact they bought more during the offer period!

[kingyon1] 30/11/2011 22:39

Have you seen the share price today? When it's been run down into the twenties we'll all be glad to see 38p. Hope i'm wrong as I still hold a few myself but i feel something is badly wrong here and experience tells me to expect the worst. Just the fact that HQ have no regard for shareholders whatsoever speaks volumes in itself. I'm pretty sure for example that Pope sold some of it's stake to Energees to enable them to get to 51%, how many Pope hold now is anyones guess as is how many Energees now hold is. Corporate governance is key here but so far we've seen precious little of that. As i've said, I hope i'm wrong and I wish all long term sufferers well.

[j drama] 30/11/2011 21:21

Why would holders accept 38p when they turned it down when the licences were in trouble now that they have been resolved?