Redt Energy Share Discussion Threads

[pierre oreilly] 15/2/2017 09:48

Dig, I doubt you can be as thick skinned as you appear. You must have sold and want to trash reds share price by trashing the moderated thread. It's really the single logical explanation of you behaviour.

[dlg3] 15/2/2017 09:47

just relax pierre you sound like you are in a rush to offload or trade...news will come as and when......just make sure youi are holding when it does..and if you think what I post makes a differance to the Sp then you are delusional...

[dogrunner11] 15/2/2017 09:46

Are you mad Pierre?

I've hardly posted recently and if referring to the other thread the creator barred me for posting when he wasn't quite ready, how pathetic?

Quite why he chose to ban someone who has such a large investment in said share and holding a few million of these, yet allowing others who do not hold shares but clearly intent on disrupting was only heading one way.

If we look at the measure of that chap who created thread he ran at the first hurdle, in fact he didn't attempt to jump that hurdle did he? Clearly not man enough for the job, so good riddance.

As for EHM, not that you follow AIM shares or a trader as you keep pointing out, has risen on back of news Pierre..... yes news not because of some BB.

[dlg3] 15/2/2017 09:41

try measuremguy,s thread..

[dlg3] 15/2/2017 09:41

good post pierre, you must like the thread a lot to visit as much as you do....

good morning 12bn...

[pierre oreilly] 15/2/2017 09:38

561, well bobby, where were you when we wanted, and got, an informative red bb? You criticised those who created and supported it, and encouraged those who destroyed it. But I doubt you realise - that seems to be the problem, an unrealisation of what attracts buyers.

Immature, uneducated, obsessive, superfluous, nonsense posts turn interested people away. Everyone has given up hope of ever having a reasonable board where interested people can get some further intelligent information about red and perhaps buy in if they know what other informed shareholders know. This share should be, and would be imv, performing as emh has done the last few days, if there was a half decent bb where confidence was gained.

The other thread was formed to keep to intelligent discussion, not yet more uninformed green madness. You yourself contributed to its destruction, just as dig and dog did. They don't realise they are ruining their own investment potential. Bbs do affect the price of tiny caps, as do rnss. The reality of the situation imv is the red BBS are turning people away only leaving rnss to boost the price, which it will do in time irrespective of the obsessed suicidal posters who will not allow a decent thread to be established.

I'm not talking about ramping btw, just a medium where the real story of red and battery storage can be told, which would result in more investors in droves, if the obsessive, immature and ignorant input weren't interjected. That's what the moderated thread was created for and many see that, yet dig and dog will even pay to post on there for some reason, and ruin in. So bobby, you currently have the situation you encouraged, a bb which turns potential investors away.

[12bn] 15/2/2017 08:59

The share price is heading back to the 8p area,more slowly than I expected but nice and steady. I heard that the unused storage machines on Gigha are going to be used as a Herring Gull nesting site if they don't rust away completely.

[netcurtains] 15/2/2017 08:54

THE PROBLEM WITH NUCLEAR
==========================

Its a constant supply - it cannot be turned down or up!
Nuclear without STORAGE is a non starter.
Hence, in France, they need large numbers of Hydroelectric power stations to be the "storage" in their system.

In the UK, if we go too far down the nuclear path we will need a way of STORING power - on a large scale.

[dlg3] 15/2/2017 08:21

REDT Develop Innovative Long-Lasting Battery

Fully recyclable, compared to alternative technologies like Lead Acid and Lithium.
High cycle ability and charge acceptance.
Reliable performance with very low maintenance for lowest total cost of ownership.
System life: more than 10,000 charge/discharge cycles matching PV and wind generator life.
Electrolyte has indefinite life.
The company holds exclusive IP rights for the REDT technology.

[dlg3] 15/2/2017 08:19

VANADIUM REDOX FLOW BATTERY,S LAST OVER 20 YEARS


REDT has developed an energy storage solution, which is based on a vanadium-vanadium redox couple.

The REDT product has the following attributes:

Fully recyclable, compared to alternative technologies like Lead Acid and Lithium.
High cycle ability and charge acceptance.
Reliable performance with very low maintenance for lowest total cost of ownership.
System life: more than 10,000 charge/discharge cycles matching PV and wind generator life.
Electrolyte has indefinite life.
The company holds exclusive IP rights for the REDT technology.

[dlg3] 15/2/2017 07:53

powervault chasing the domestic market..

A U.K. energy-storage startup is aiming to take on Tesla Inc. in the competition to outfit homes with affordable back-up battery power.

Powervault Ltd. is preparing to boost production of its lead- and lithium-ion batteries, said Managing Director Joe Warren. The London-based company is targeting sales of 50,000 units a year by 2020, up from about 1,000 this year, he said.

“We have a huge market to go after in the U.K.,” said Warren, a data center operator turned battery-maker who’s entering the home storage market just as billionaire Elon Musk switches on Tesla’s U.S. Gigafactory. Musk expects the plant will double the global production of lithium-ion batteries next year.

[dogrunner11] 14/2/2017 20:19

You do not put all your energy requirements into one basket, nuclear will be here for many years no-doubt!!!

[dlg3] 14/2/2017 20:04

dogrunner11 if the thing has a mealt down, clean up cost today about £142 billlion....

[dlg3] 14/2/2017 20:01

if the argument is speed then look here a EV manufactured by a director of REDT Sir John Samuels manufactured in the 70,s, the fastest road legal EV.......granted it has had a little tune up after its manufacture....but shows what is possible......

also another good watch is who killed the electric car.... here..

[dogrunner11] 14/2/2017 19:45

Construction cost of Hinckley point is £18 billion, add running costs and disposal.

How much storage would redT and Jabil do for £18 billion today? Bet it's a better price then $490 quoted.

Don't need all those staff to manage a battery FFS!!!


Edit - construction cost increased to £37 billion.

[dogrunner11] 14/2/2017 19:41

No idea but what was cost of nuclear 30 or 10 years ago?

If storage follows similar pattern to say solar and falls by 70% in ten years or so then surely this is much better then nuclear and does not have associated costs when end of life.

Storage will come down rapidly, I doubt vanadium will be chemical of choice in 10 years and the capacity will have increased dramatically.

Previous comparison to Hinckley point is void, give energy storage company such as redT several billion the cost will be 50% less or more.

Comparing a new tech to an old, look at cost savings already achieved in less than 5 years already.

And it's safe, I'd live next to a VRB I wouldn't live next to Hinckley point.

[dlg3] 14/2/2017 19:39

I personally can not see the charging point thing working.......can you imagine when there is a football match or a concert and thousands of cars travel from all over the country, they all want to charge there car before the travel home all 3000 of them...how is that going to work????? why not turn all the petrol stations into electrolyte stations???? the infastructure is there already and the ones with enough space could be run off wind or solar with mains back up....

[dlg3] 14/2/2017 19:33

To me the whole thing with thorium is like hydrogen and cars, why would you waste electric to make hydrogen??? it takes about 50kwh to make 1ltr of hydrogen that in return produces just over 33 kwh of power equivelent, why not just store the electric in a battery......better still instead of recharging the car just change the electrolyte......spent electrolyte out and new electrolyte in, it would not bother me if I had to refuel every 200 miles....I would rather refuel as we do now with petrol than rely on pluging in every night, or waiting at a charging point at a service station, can you imagine the service station near birmingham with 2000 cars waiting to be charged, either the whole car park will have charging points or there will be a very long queue.......

[dlg3] 14/2/2017 18:51

Thorium radioactive waste is only dangerous for 300 years so yes it is less radioactive that uranium......

you see they turn thorium into uranium 233.......

[fieldhouse] 14/2/2017 18:49

Did you read the later paragraph by Martin where he disagreed !!

I would still rather have Thorium than uranium.Just need more research.

Agree to differ

[fieldhouse] 14/2/2017 17:14

Guys.
My point is that safe nuclear is a long way of. Twenty years.?

In the mean time we shut down the fossil fuel power stations and what are we left with.?

You have to Know what the alternatives are.

My money is on battery storage.