Quadrise Fuels Share Discussion Threads

[tradeyodha] 17/12/2015 18:31

15p today. Hoping to get my position filled around 16p this week.

[hotfinance14] 17/12/2015 12:35

It looks like we will not see a constant rise in the share price until we go commercial. So far on news we have gone North then slowly South again.

[sallad3] 17/12/2015 12:14

AE

2016? Financial or Calendar?

[argyll eagle] 17/12/2015 10:17

PC

And news of the big one, KSA, expected before the end of the year.

[sallad3] 17/12/2015 09:48

pcj

"Methane is non-toxic, most other common fuels are highly toxic. LNG tanks are all double walled and very thick, making them much stronger and more robust than tanks for other fuels and chemicals. Methane is not explosive in open air and is less flammable than other fuels."

Also your ref yesterday to the CNM ship. Your 18 mths is far too optimistic. It is Pacific run and MAN engined.

TY

The longer it sits here at 14, the greater the chance of finishing the downward leg of the small H&S and filling the gap. Sideways moves across the channel and the fall off in volume for the holiday season don't help.

Also people do need to look at Market Cap size. £50m is your 6p, but it's going to take some fundamental news or further delays to get it there.

[pcjoe] 17/12/2015 09:11

Jeez - nearly 9000 passengers/crew each travelling on these new LNG powered Cruise ships - Is it just me? - Perhaps LNG isnt highly explosive?

How`s about a few ounces of semtex in a coke can placed/hidden by radicalised crew member adjacent LNG tanks? - 2500 multi race/culture crew maybe? - What security cghecks would work with that reality?

Are they serious in this day & age?

[argyll eagle] 17/12/2015 08:23

Tiger

Yodhaha has been telling us that QFI will drop to 6p for months. I thought the idea behind CFD and spread betting was to generate fast profits from bets that TA strongly supported. This guy is fixated on QFI because it once did well for him and others during a period when it was hyped to silly prices like so many other AIM companies, he goes long and short at the same time, claims that he knows when RNSs are coming out - but at the same time says they don't affect the SP, his bets are often stopped out,and he often has to wait months for a price he has predicted to occur. In summary a chimp with a pin could do as well, if not better.

[tigerbright] 17/12/2015 07:14

Yoda, you did well with your recent QFI short but your record with QFI is chequered at best. You've also got it wrong plenty of times, often explaining it away as "taking a small hit" or other such language. Just my opinion, and no offence intended, but I think it's too early to say that you can read QFI like an open book. If you now post evidence of your successful calls, you also need to post all the instances when you called it wrong. Again, no offence intended and hope you keep posting.

[argyll eagle] 17/12/2015 06:11

Yodhaha

You seem to have totally lost it. LOL

[tradeyodha] 17/12/2015 02:42

Sallad I still think it has potential to quickly touch 16p or little above before moving south. I have my order there for full short position. If that does not get filled I will take position anyway. It is bound to go to 10p followed by 8p and then 6p. These are my 3 targets to start with. QFI is turning out to be my best trading stock with behaviour and news releases similar to QPP. Quite predictable now. I could even predicted RNS last week based on trade data pattern. QPP also had similar patterns before it went down big time. Please dyor.

[pcjoe] 16/12/2015 19:02

Ammons - rather sail on it with msar used as fuel than lng - but then again possibly excellent if accidental way of getting tonnes of cheap containerised Chinese stuff to the moon I suppose.....

[annonna] 16/12/2015 17:27

pc, You wouldn't want to sail into rough seas with that lot on board, would you?? Seems a tad top heavy to me!

[pcjoe] 16/12/2015 10:15

Our pals at APM terminals welcoming the biggest Box ship to ever visit the US




Sailing on MSAR in 18 months or less?

[pcjoe] 15/12/2015 21:39

40p at end of 2016 not bad target Sallad ( from current 14P ) - You might get it - Probably better that share price at least that high to greet likely Lono success - Cant help but think such success might prove to be initial launch pad for end game - Therefore the higher the share price is at that point the better IMHO

Pecem not in Venezuella by the way - Brazil apparently - Silly old me....

[sallad3] 15/12/2015 21:29

pcj

Your last comment is spot on. It is indeed about who they know. BUT that doesn't make a long life product. Will I see my "few at 40p" share price before end 2016? I don't think so.

[pcjoe] 15/12/2015 21:08

Almost Scary having this lot back QFI - Maersks fingers in a lot of giant pies it seems - Thats a lot of shipping terminals committed to rolling out MSAR fuel post Lono methinks

[sallad3] 15/12/2015 20:59

TY

200,50,20,10 all moving south.

Bunched 3 days trading on candlesticks after a gap.

On close this is going to break the 200SMA this week and then farther south.

Add in fundamentals and...

[sallad3] 15/12/2015 19:18

AE

You really are a sad case.

You on LSE "I think it also again highlights the need for the msar recipe to be tweaked depending on the feed residue, a house msar as it were, to use the wine analogy."

Do you understand even basic chemistry? Why do you think it took so long to get MSAR2 for Maersk?

[deutsch3] 15/12/2015 12:26

Don't forget that using a waste/residue product, whatever the industry, will have an effect on the whole market (ie. it replaces something). Residue volumes will be dependant on oil produced(and the right kind) and the residue will adopt an new 'useful' place in the mix,and a new price which will itself be subject to market forces.- Put crudely ' you can't have waste/residue from a none existent main product'. There has to be a continuing market for crude oil and other products for the whole thing to work out!

[pcjoe] 15/12/2015 12:20

Got to get a couple of MMUs up & running in the field to get this side of the business moving - Nothing like a current & commercially succesfully running operation as a tool for generating sales

[pcjoe] 15/12/2015 12:08

Following on from stuff being posted on ii BB re latest RNS - MSAR can likely be processed from collected heavy oil residue/crude from say a local refiner or large oilfield ( Say Montana/north Dakota - major US fracking zone) & Processed through a centralised MMU - Finished MSAR could then be loaded onto tankers & used as a cheap diesel substitute to create power for multiple local oil head/fracking operations

Is there any reason why MSAR could not be made from MMU atomised raw crude in oilfield areas to make fuel grade MSAR? - Got to be cheaper than importing heavily processed diesel - especially if crude remains cheapish going forward - who needs a multi million squid refinery to provide fuel!

A giant oilfield services outfit like Haliburton could well be involved/interested in something like this

[pcjoe] 15/12/2015 11:37

AE/Sallad - LOL - Wot u 2 like!

AE - re legality - maybe not IMOs intention - But unless they can get fuel grade residue cheaply down to 0.5% sulphur or get mass adoption of scrubbers going on - Then HFO as we currently know it, is going to be illegal come 2020/25 - MSAR should definitely thrive under scrubber option & I dont think we can rule out a low sulphur version of MSAR - Cheap, zero distillate, fuel grade viscosity (with benefits) in low sulphur residual hfo would surely prove a winner - & no scrubbers required! - Refiners likely on the case for standard hfo - But doable in mass quantities using average crude before 2025? - Never mind 2020 - Beyond my chemi o grade & crystal ball that one

Sallad - 25% residue possibly all thats required on the marine side - the other 75% possibly already going for bitumen roads/roofing - Freed up distillate from MSAR process can help make up any fuel shortfall!

[sallad3] 15/12/2015 10:47

PC

AE forgets to tell remind you that the residue at only 25% of refineries can be used for MSAR