Plasmon plc Share Discussion Threads

[timtom2] 04/11/2007 22:39

OK - so not alone so this is a bottom.
Recent volumes certainly interesting.

[diogenesj] 04/11/2007 21:44

'Fraid so, Tim.

[timtom2] 04/11/2007 21:29

Looks like the bottom or I'm alone?

[strutt12] 04/11/2007 18:56

Looks like it!!

[timtom2] 02/11/2007 16:22

Given the downdraught the market has a whole has been experiencing, and especially stocks with $ exposure, PLM have fared well. This has the hallmarks of a bottom to me.

Am I alone?

[timtom2] 01/11/2007 15:20

Again some volume compared to the average.
Interested to know what is going on but does look useful.
Volume preceeds price !!

[timtom2] 31/10/2007 11:55

Bought some more - willing to admit I am wrong but there is an uptrend still in place and PLM is at the bottom of it. The recent trades look useful too so took the plunge.

[timtom2] 29/10/2007 16:10

But I know this dogs pattern. I can wait.

[mikey_b] 29/10/2007 14:57

Tim, you are a faithful follower. I hope it works out for you but you are missing a lot of opportunities elsewhere while you wait for this dog ;-)

br, mikey.

[timtom2] 29/10/2007 14:47

Anyone else notice the renewed interest recently shown in PLM on Fri 27/10 and a little today?

I think we are close to the bottom and due a run-up, sometime.

[timtom2] 25/10/2007 14:44

Agree - I think it is a good entry point here.

[madmix] 25/10/2007 14:13

Still holding TimTom2 - I bought these on a long term view. If you have confidence in Hanover's strategy, it's perhaps not a bad time to buy whilst things are quiet.

Not much to discuss since last month's AGM and director buys, though. Interims due early December, I suspect.

[timtom2] 25/10/2007 13:53

Couple of interesting trades yesterday.
Still worth adding a few more.
Where are the regulars from earlier in the Summer?

[timtom2] 15/10/2007 21:09

You forgot ITM, MDW, FTC plus half a dozen others. Good luck to you too.

[mikey_b] 15/10/2007 11:02

Good luck Tim. There are far better opportunities, almost guaranteed - IND, AFR, SIA, CFE.

[timtom2] 15/10/2007 10:51

I've bought back-in and am serious. The applications PLM are targetting will be safe from HD for a few years and will work in parallel in some instances.

Having run with this from 20's (in) to high 40's (out) I can see it doing it again - just don't know exactly when.

[mikey_b] 15/10/2007 10:26

lol......come on TimTom, you are not serious are you? Distributed server farms. high availability and redundancy are the norm. MTBFs of millions of hours, RAID configuration. Multiple failures are required for HD storage in serious back up strategies to fail.

best,
mikey
ps: Only us here and I don't hold anymore but follow for the moment

[timtom2] 15/10/2007 10:11

Very neat but what about mechanical and thermal effects on reliability. Somehow an optical disk strikes me as more reliable.

[mikey_b] 15/10/2007 09:49

As an advocate of HD over other disks I liked this story. 4TB on a HD is pretty neat.

[timtom2] 04/10/2007 22:14

This is an interesting one from 4th Oct:

[mikey_b] 04/10/2007 14:49

Good point. I hope that is clear in the sales pitch !

[timtom2] 04/10/2007 14:41

mikey - they will win some business by the fact that good paractice also requires diversification of media types too. So UDO stands a good chance alongside HD. Some authorities requires 3 independent media types, not just different locations.

[timtom2] 04/10/2007 14:36

each to his own. I made good money here once and look to do so again.