Pets At Home Share Discussion Threads

[yump] 25/9/2019 18:13

I suggest you look at the 5 year chart and the forecast profit/eps and rating. There's nothing bad, but its a big rise from 120p.

There seems to be no middle ground once momentum takes hold nowadays.

PETS cannot possibly be worth 120p and then 240p within the space of time that its moved. The business has not changed that much.

There are what can only be described as crazy movements around on no real news:
EZJ: 1800p then 900p in a year.
MCL: All over the place BEFORE Woodford started selling.
etc.

Wouldn't surprise me if BAB did the same, as its not really got any of the serious problems that people were talking about on the way down.

Saga, possibly, but that has had a big drop in profits, so a recovery stock rather than purely oversold.

"Sentiment is simple" I got that from a book, but can't remember which one.

[sao1] 25/9/2019 15:26

What's happening here?

[niggle] 24/9/2019 09:16

Is this because Schroders sold 1%?

Weird movements on little news

[yump] 19/9/2019 15:45

I think there was another bit in the news about an insignificant drop in retail last week or something (yawn). Could just be a good run and a bit of profit taking. Not me as I sold around 210p ;(((

[sao1] 19/9/2019 15:19

What's driving this down?

[niggle] 17/9/2019 09:03

All it took was a tip in Shares Magazine to break the run! Where were they at a quid?

[sao1] 06/9/2019 15:12

Wonder why GS thought the share price should be £1.55

[niggle] 19/8/2019 10:00

Sammy - yump made it quite clear that he sold out - what's with the rudeness? So GS want it to drop. So what, it's going the other way.

[sammyshares] 13/8/2019 08:11

Goldman Sachs don't what they are talking about when they put a 155 target on PETS. Rose-tinted ramp fest.

[yump] 12/8/2019 23:39

That would be nice, although I think I would prefer seeing them in the stocks on the village green.

[ianian4] 12/8/2019 20:10

Goldman are corrupt fraudsters. Didnt they downgrade to 95 pence or 105 to force the price lower. In cahoots with shorters to buy stock back. One day , the only way that we will be able to speak to Goldman Bankers will be on the telephone through the glass at a federal prison.

[sammyshares] 12/8/2019 19:31

The rampers such as Yump the chump isn't telling you the Goldman Sachs target is a long way down at 155

This explains the sell off

[sammyshares] 12/8/2019 19:30

Pets at Home Group PLC using EPIC/TICKER code (LON:PETS) had its stock rating noted as ‘Reiterates217; with the recommendation being set at ‘SELL’ today by analysts at Goldman Sachs. Pets at Home Group PLC are listed in the Consumer Services sector within UK Main Market. Goldman Sachs have set their target price at 155 GBX on its stock. This indicates the analyst believes there is a potential downside of -29.7% from the opening price of 220.6 GBX. Over the last 30 and 90 trading days the company share price has increased 28.1 points and increased 62.7 points respectively. The 1 year high for the stock price is 229.6 GBX while the 52 week low for the stock is 101.95 GBX.

Pets at Home Group PLC has a 50 day moving average of 195.11 GBX and the 200 Day Moving Average price is recorded at 153.41. There are currently 500,000,000 shares in issue with the average daily volume traded being 1,447,485. Market capitalisation for LON:PETS is £1,117,699,966 GBP.

[sammyshares] 12/8/2019 19:29

Pets at Home Group PLC 29.7% Potential Decrease Indicated by Goldman Sachs

[yump] 12/8/2019 14:04

... raises one eyebrow, shakes head and applies the filter button...

[sammyshares] 12/8/2019 13:56

I buy pet stuff at amazon.

[yump] 12/8/2019 13:38

Can you read ?

[sammyshares] 12/8/2019 13:20

are you saying more people buy pet stuff from amazon because it is so much cheaper?

[sammyshares] 12/8/2019 12:35

The bearish doji appears and everyone wants to talk about brexit crashing the price.

[yump] 12/8/2019 09:37

I find it very disappointing that there is so much discussion, forum 'debate', active movements set up, people with banners, about Brexit (where nobody really knows whether we'll be better or worse off) but as far as I can see no collective anything to get people to think about their internet buying behaviour and what effect it will and is having on (eg.) their children's ability to get jobs.

All very easy to blame it on 'the internet', rather than changing habits.

That's enough o/t from me ! If I'm not careful I'll be onto the subject of how all the businesses that supposedly value their (some 'premium') brands very highly, have now all got discount and voucher code boxes at their checkouts, like the latest offers from Farm Foods that come bundled through your letterbox.

[yump] 12/8/2019 09:16

o/t judging by many friends behaviour I think there are an increasing number of people deliberately not buying from Amazon if they can help it.

3 results from Amazon on the first page of Google for a product that is sold in plenty of other UK shops, means that our retailers are suffering because of that, but it never seems to hit the headlines.

The combination of Google giving multiple results from the same shop (Amazon), plus some results in $ for some bizarre reason is doing and has been doing a huge amount of invisible damage. Many smaller businesses have found that the only way they get internet sales is to list with Amazon or Ebay.

If you're wondering whether I have a bit of a 'thing' about this topic, you're damn right. This insidious and invisible movement of money to a company in the US that avoids UK tax is something we should all be actively avoiding imo.

OK might have to wait another day for the product, which is real shocker.

The Brexit 'take back control' mantra and effort should be applied to something that will actually make a difference, rather than just barking up the anti-EU tree.

'Take back control' from the megalithic US businesses that are wrecking ours.