Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Petropavlovsk Plc LSE:POG London Ordinary Share GB0031544546 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -1.20 -4.38% 26.20 14,677,433 16:35:06
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
26.35 26.45 28.20 26.20 28.20
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Mining 391.90 64.63 0.78 36.5 1,037
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
16:59:15 O 89,254 26.496 GBX

Petropavlovsk (POG) Latest News

More Petropavlovsk News
Petropavlovsk Investors    Petropavlovsk Takeover Rumours

Petropavlovsk (POG) Discussions and Chat

Petropavlovsk Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
01/3/202115:53Petropavlovsk Gold Miner - inc. Charts54,229
31/5/202009:44*** Petropavlovsk ***28
18/5/202015:55Reasons why to Buy and Hold in Petropavlovsk (POG)6
09/3/202011:01Petropavlovsk - coup by Prudential?12
13/1/201807:37Short POG the DOG to 1.5p35

Add a New Thread

Petropavlovsk (POG) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
2021-03-01 16:59:1526.5089,25423,648.74O
2021-03-01 16:35:0626.203,044,074797,547.39UT
2021-03-01 16:29:5826.402,513663.43AT
2021-03-01 16:29:5826.4030981.58AT
2021-03-01 16:29:5826.40427112.73AT
View all Petropavlovsk trades in real-time

Petropavlovsk (POG) Top Chat Posts

Petropavlovsk Daily Update: Petropavlovsk Plc is listed in the Mining sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker POG. The last closing price for Petropavlovsk was 27.40p.
Petropavlovsk Plc has a 4 week average price of 26p and a 12 week average price of 26p.
The 1 year high share price is 41.50p while the 1 year low share price is currently 14.46p.
There are currently 3,957,270,254 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 9,210,605 shares. The market capitalisation of Petropavlovsk Plc is £1,036,804,806.55.
troy: Robert. When copying and pasting a link just replace the small "tt" in the "http" part of the link with capital T's ie: "hTTp" . This makes the link clickable. No idea why, it must be an ADVFN thing. Anyway.......... An interesting angle from the (so far !) pro Mavlovski Amur Info news site. hTTps:// They seem to think Maslovski's "arrest" is all a bit of a stitch up. Perhaps it's disbelief that one of their own is as bent as the rest ? Perhaps they're right ? Who knows............. Case "to order"? The sudden and strange arrest of Pavel Maslovsky may be related to the conflict over "Petropavlovsk" In the midst of a corporate conflict between the old team of the Amurskaya Petropavlovsk and supporters of the Chelyabinsk YuGK, the founder of the company, Pavel Maslovsky, was unexpectedly accused of embezzlement and imprisoned for two months. However, the very nature of the accusations, as well as the hasty and excessively harsh actions of law enforcement officers, raise many questions from both the company's employees and outside observers. We tried to understand the background of the incident and understand who might be interested in the arrest. Searches in Pokrovsky Rudnik: there are more questions than answers On December 24, searches and seizure of documents took place in the Moscow and Annunciation offices of Pokrovsky Rudnik, a subsidiary of Petropavlovsk. According to media reports, the reason for the invasion of the security forces was accusations of allegedly large embezzlements committed by the former head of the company Pavel Maslovsky. Denis Aleksandrov, the current CEO of Petropavlovsk PLC, entered the Moscow office of the company together with law enforcement officers . We will remind that he was recently appointed to his position due to the fact that a criminal case was opened against the previous general director Maxim Meshcheryakov, a protege of the Chelyabinsk YuGK, for an attempted bandit seizure of the same Moscow office. In the evening of the next day, there were reports that Maslovsky had been imprisoned for two months. The incident came as a shock to the company's employees, everyone who followed its activities, and especially those who personally know its founder. Pavel Maslovsky is the man who actually created Petropavlovsk from scratch, turning it into the third largest gold mining company in Russia in a quarter of a century. His last large-scale project is the construction of an autoclave complex at Pokrovka for the processing of refractory ores - a unique high-tech enterprise, which are few in the world. In addition, Maslovsky was a deputy of the regional council, a senator from the Amur region. Pokrovsky Rudnik has always sponsored numerous social and cultural projects in the region. It is extremely difficult to believe that a successful large businessman, who has invested 25 years of his life in the company, for some reason needed to harm his brainchild. However, the investigation insists on its own. Accusations from scratch? What is Maslovsky accused of? The official representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Irina Volk, was very laconic and managed in her statement with extremely vague wording, from which one can understand that the matter is about “embezzlement of funds on an especially large scale”. According to a press release from the department, Maslovsky is suspected of stealing the company's financial assets worth 95 million rubles. We tried to find out what the essence of the matter is and where such a serious amount came from. So, according to the version of the investigative department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, in 2018 Maslovsky "out of mercenary motives and for the purpose of personal enrichment" approved the acquisition by Pokrovsky Rudnik of a land plot and a building in Blagoveshchensk at Lenina, 140/1, at a "deliberately inflated at 218.4 million rubles. " Investigators, according to some methods known only to them, calculated that the price of real estate was overstated by at least 95 million, which Maslovsky allegedly put into his pocket. In the company itself, these accusations caused deep bewilderment. They said that the deal was two years ago, it was checked by both Russian and international auditors as part of the audit of the annual accounts and did not find any violations. Let's see if the price could be really overpriced, because we are talking about a not a small office building in the very center of the regional capital with an area of ​​2,500 square meters. The popular CIAN real estate website will help you figure it out, where you can find similar areas for sale and compare prices. For example , an office building at 108 Lenina, from which a 10-minute walk to the acquisition of Pokrovsky Rudnik, is billed for 100 million rubles for a footage of 1,000 square meters, that is, 100,000 rubles per square meter. At such prices, the building, which Maslovsky is accused of buying, would be worth the entire 250 million, that is, much more expensive than what Pokrovsky Rudnik paid. Not surprisingly, the auditors did not find anything strange and illegal in the deal. The Supreme Court is not a decree The chosen measure of restraint, which was approved by the Tverskoy Court of Moscow, seems even more strange and inexplicable. In June of this year, the Supreme Court specifically adopted amendments to toughen the requirements for the detention of entrepreneurs. The Criminal Procedure Code generally prohibits arrests on charges of economic crimes, but law enforcement officers sometimes try to pretend that this is a common criminal offense. Therefore, the Supreme Court specifically ordered the investigation, when applying for arrest, to prove that the incriminated crime was not directly related to the economic activities of the accused. No confirmation means no arrest. In this case, even if one imagines that the theft took place, it is clearly connected with the activities of Pokrovsky Rudnik - after all, the building was bought for his office needs. Nevertheless, Maslovsky was promptly sent to jail, which is a flagrant and obvious violation of the law. Who benefits from the arrest of Pavel Maslovsky? What could force the law enforcement agencies to put on "mask shows" in the company's offices right on the New Year's Eve, present strange charges, and even put its founder under lock and key, while ignoring the decisions of the Supreme Court? The federal media are already expressing opinions about the ordered nature of the case and about attempts to force Maslovsky to abandon the fight for the enterprise. The same point of view is held at the Pokrovsky Rudnik itself. The unfriendly takeover of Petropavlovsk by the Urals YuGK, conceived by its owner Konstantin Strukov as a blitzkrieg in June, has clearly stalled. Since the summer, there have been courts, the FAS and British regulatory authorities continue to check the actions of shareholders controlled by Strukov, the staff of the enterprise writes protest letters. In the meantime, production plans are “adjusted downward,” development projects are “postponed,” and the company's share price on the stock exchange falls. It got to the point that it was necessary to urgently change the appointed general director Meshcheryakov because of the criminal case brought against him. In this situation, the arrest of Maslovsky may turn out to be a desperate step, an attempt to tilt the balance in his favor, as well as revenge for intractability. Then the mysterious presence of the new general director of Petropavlovsk PLC Aleksandrov, who has not and could not have anything to do with the cases two years ago, is quite understandable. We will refrain from our own assessments of the actions of law enforcement officers. But it should be noted that they are developing according to the classic scenario of raider seizures of the 90s - 2000s: collusion of shareholders, information war against the enterprise, then an attempt to seize by force on their own, relying on "athletic guys", and when it fails it succeeds, the involvement of "friendly" security officials and the fabrication of a criminal case against a competitor. Already in the process of preparing the material, new information was received, which indirectly confirms all the concerns expressed. A member of the Public Monitoring Commission and human rights activist Marina Litvinovich managed to meet with Pavel Maslovsky in the isolation ward the day after his arrest. It turned out that he was placed in a three-bed cell with two neighbors accused under Article 105 (“Murder”). “This is a direct violation of federal detention law. Maslovsky, with his article on embezzlement or embezzlement, cannot be held with persons accused of a violent crime, Litvinovich said.
rochdae: The whole market is a punt. Get real. Pog too many positives for the share price imo. Though progress will be slower, still undervalued. Old management was corrupt. Russians and fraud etc. Just simplistic mindsets. Roch
popeye888: srpactive - I could be wrong but I think the 4,367,335 shares awarded to Denis Alexandrov were free (nil consideration) so it's not as encouraging as you might think. Simply a free gift for his efforts. "The Award in respect of ordinary shares of £0.01 each in the share capital of the Company (the Shares) was made at nil consideration and, upon vesting, the Shares subject to the Award will be acquired for nil consideration. The Award is based on a share price of 30.77 pence, being the average middle market closing price of such Shares on the three dealing days immediately prior to the date the Award was made."
weemonkey: This is ludicrous. I have been over the interim numbers again and again and as far as I can tell those were the best operating profits ($146million) at interims ever in Petropavlosk's history. The next best interim operating profits were in 2009 being $111million. (source Sharescope) The headline loss announced Friday was a deeply technical loss and was caused by "a negative non-cash adjustment of US$(122.2)m related to a fair value loss on the conversion option (H1 2019: US$(9.2)m) reflecting the increase in the Company's share price" When you add the current interims to even the downwardly revised production estimates for the second half you are going to get some highly respectable figures at the full year. Current share price is bargain. If if dips Monday I will buy a few more.
apple53: Troy Thank you for confirming the time line. I fear Patrick may be inundated this morning. Your language this morning may have been excessive, but I guess, thanks to MidasX (assuming Patrick does not check this bulletin board), Patrick can inform the board the way some well-informed and long standing interested parties are seeing this situation, and that an RNS like this has the opposite effect to that desired. The share price response this morning, on top of recent falls, I had partly put down to falling markets, but I increasingly think it is a mixture of marketmakers marking down the price on the open (due to the old but negative news in the RNS), exacerbated by disappointment from those of us who hoped to see a better board response. I didn't sell this morning but someone who had hoped that the next RNS would report Meshcheryakov being replaced may have finally given up. I wish I had more time (and more Russian language), as there is some work to do on this: we need to catalogue all the investigations of Meshcheryakov and Strukov (and linked entities), look at the timelines of verdicts/results, help Patrick by pushing for better communication, and consider the implications of verdicts. I think M will be replaced - he was only meant to be temporary - and that a new appointment could see a decent share price jump. Before this, however, I am not completely confident the results will be stellar, as the new auditors will definitely want to err on the side of caution and, as discussed above, new management will want to kitchen sink as much as possible. I get the sinking feeling that I should be selling, with a reasonable probability of buying back 10-20% lower. I did sell some at 38 ish but stupidly have bought it all back in the low 30s. There is also the opportunity cost as there is a lot of cheap stuff around right now (most bank stocks for starters) that will probably go up when the mRNA vaccines get emergency use licences. The other piece of work is to check on board members' shareholdings, and to see if any of them are well-placed to find a buyer who would carry employees.
midasx: Does not really paint the true picture. Only two companies with notifiable short positions and only Polygon with a sizable short position which experienced POG investors will know is a hedge position. Polygon have recently reduced their short position by 0.58% and they will increase it if the POG share price increases. Another $2.6 Million debt reduction taking the total reduction to $85,000,000. Someone picked up 4,500,000 shares @ 30.2468p late trade just reported from 18:16:14 yesterday.
popeye888: Quite amusing, "By contrast The previous board it should be noted presided over a transformed company whose share price rose 700% in 3 years making it the stand-out performer in the ftse 250" Quite amusing because you fail to mention that the previous board took the share price from £6 down to 5p and then up to 35p. Didn't the old BOD do well! This company would have gone into liquidation under the management of the old BOD if it wasn't for shareholders helping out with more cash via a rights issue. £6 to 35p is not very impressive. You can do what you like with numbers, it just depends which numbers you choose to use and how you present them. I know there is a lot more to this story, but I think the support of the shareholders together with the rise in the gold price is mainly responsible for where this company is now.
undervaluedassets: Everything about this suggests to me that Strukov and his ilk are happy with the company being in a state of chaos as it gives them the opportunity to pick up more shares on the cheap... And even at some point in the future to put shareholders out of their misery by making a derisory offer for the whole.. I must ring Prosperity and see what they make of all this nonsense. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. And if share price performance is a measure of success (which it surely is in the final estimation) well since they have come to power the new management and board have certainly been successful at driving the price of shares in POG down. By contrast The previous board it should be noted presided over a transformed company whose share price rose 700% in 3 years making it the stand-out performer in the ftse 250
officehead: Yes the price of gold is keeping the share price at levels above 32p. However the silence from the new executive is likely to be acting as an anchor to the share price. This internal conflict does not seem to be going in the right direction for shareholders. We have absolutely no idea what the intentions of the new executive are. The article below suggests things are not going to be resolved quickly - hope I am wrong. hTTps://
undervaluedassets: It is greed isn't it route1 ... my view on how this plays out :- It is not enough for UGC and Everest just to be shareholders and watch their holdings gently appreciate and count their dividends... as Strukov claims oh so innocently in the FT "my only wish is be a shareholder of a big company, which takes my interests into account, which pays dividends".. Really ?? Everything that has happened recently belies his view. They want it all. 500-700 thousand ounces of gold per annum is too big a prize for them to settle for a part share.And not only do they want it all but they want it cheap. So they are deliberately, shamelessly creating chaos. They are currently 'keying their own car' to coin a phrase. Why? to knock the share price. When the POG share price is on the floor they will then adopt the posture of a knight in shining armour and offer to rescue desperate shareholders with an offer to buy the whole for a derisory price. Another thing ...If you listen to the statements that come out of Strukov's mouth he is completely brazen and shameless. He is quite 'Trumpean' in that he just says says whatever platitude suits his purposes at the time. And as for what he says having any relationship with what then happens or the truth ... forget it. for those that missed it here is the interview with the FT.. Reading that interview and comparing it to what has since transpired is telling. This company has fallen amongst thieves I am afraid. This is my view. I would love to be wrong.
Petropavlovsk share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20210302 05:07:11