We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Petropavlovsk Plc | LSE:POG | London | Ordinary Share | GB0031544546 | ORD 1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
TIDMPOG
RNS Number : 1205I
Takeover Panel
15 June 2017
2017/10
PETROPAVLOVSK PLC
In the middle of May, the Panel Executive (the "Executive") was approached by Petropavlovsk plc ("Petropavlovsk") in relation to the submission by Renova Asset Holding Limited ("Renova"), M&G Debt Opportunities Fund II Limited ("M&G") and Sothic European Master Fund Limited ("Sothic") of resolutions proposing changes to the company's board of directors. The Executive was asked to determine whether these shareholders, and the proposed new directors, should be considered to be acting in concert under Note 2 on Rule 9.1 of the Takeover Code (the "Code") and, if this was the case, whether any such persons had acquired any interests in shares of Petropavlovsk following the date on which they were presumed to have come into concert with the result that they had thereby triggered an obligation for a mandatory offer to be made under Rule 9.1 of the Code. The resolutions proposed by Renova, M&G and Sothic are to be considered at Petropavlovsk's annual general meeting on 22 June.
The Executive has concluded that three of the four proposed new directors, namely Messrs Buck, Ashby and Soden, are, for the purposes of Note 2 on Rule 9.1, independent of the shareholders proposing their appointment. (The fourth director, Mr Egorov, is not considered to be independent, owing to his employment by Renova.) As a result, the Executive has concluded that the resolutions proposed by Renova, M&G and Sothic are not "board control-seeking" for the purposes of Note 2 on Rule 9.1 and, accordingly, that these shareholders, and the proposed new directors, should not therefore be considered to be acting in concert and that there is therefore no requirement for a mandatory offer to be made under the Code.
Each of the parties has accepted this ruling.
15 June 2017
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
STRSFMFMLFWSEDM
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
June 15, 2017 02:00 ET (06:00 GMT)
1 Year Petropavlovsk Chart |
1 Month Petropavlovsk Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions