Paysafe Share Discussion Threads

[malcolmmm] 26/2/2016 08:29

I personally haven't traded this one ,in for the longish term but it seems a great share to buy on the dips, seems to recover quickly after any weakness.

[ramas] 26/2/2016 08:28

Now shock tactics to get stock , all positive imo

[qs99] 26/2/2016 08:20

blimey, who lit the fuse?

[scottishfield] 26/2/2016 08:17

V strong this morning.

[lomax99] 26/2/2016 08:17

That's more like it, hopefully irrelevant blip over.

[trentendboy] 25/2/2016 08:53

Interesting SCH news today (Safecharge). They are in the same sector, no adverse reaction to the wirecard issue but the new deal with PaddyPower/Betfair shows they are encroaching on Paysafe customers.

I own a lot of both but SCH is a lot smaller so jumps a lot faster on big customer gains like this one

[wolfhound1] 25/2/2016 08:46

Yesterdays close looks to be a structured support level( thick red line) and now retracing up, ahead of FTSE250 announcement ( next Tuesday) and official entry on 21st ( area between thick green lines) - tracker fund buying should create a short squeeze which should be the catalyst to push PAYS through the 415p resistance level.


free stock charts from uk.advfn.com

[muffster] 25/2/2016 07:41

Not a double top, but 6th top.Likely to fall with negative news

[heliweli] 24/2/2016 22:55

Big bounce back tomorrow.

[aspex] 24/2/2016 20:32

One anomaly seems to be that while most revenues are not in pounds, then why should the share price fall when the pound also is falling. The contrary should be true and our price should be rising.

[qs99] 24/2/2016 19:19

Likewise with Skrill, due diligence, main market listing, enough advisors all over this, one would like to think as you say that pays is squeaky....dyor, let's see if their IR team are any good at all!!

[nurdin] 24/2/2016 18:57

Seems to me all those NT trades are from earlier in the day and only reported after the close.

[polythene] 24/2/2016 18:08

I would assume that since we had a massive fine from the US authorities in a previous guise (Neteller or Neovia?)for facilitating US gambling, that we are squeeky clean. We'd better be or some of this will stick. Basically the accusation seems to be that Wirecard are facilitating illegal US gambling by transferring money through a labyrinth of companies to hide the fact that it is US money.

[wolfhound1] 24/2/2016 17:17

agreed Jarega, this is just MM manipulation for profit.

Funny how MM never placed PAYS on the same lofty PE Wirecard enjoyed of 39 - but when it suits they mark PAYS down - when the reverse should be the case - wirecards pain should be PAYS gain - pure and simple.

here is some after hours negotiated trades - 402p

17:04:44 24-Feb-2016 402.45 40,616 163,459.19 Negotiated Trade
17:03:03 24-Feb-2016 399.50 7,154 28,580.23 Negotiated Trade
17:02:17 24-Feb-2016 393.06 20,408 80,216.16 Negotiated Trade
16:53:59 24-Feb-2016 377.70 3,075 11,614.38 Negotiated Trade

[jarega85] 24/2/2016 16:33

We'll bounce back, don't worry!

[johnv] 24/2/2016 16:19

interesting about zatarra, theres no names,no address, no phone no

[qs99] 24/2/2016 16:08

1st March is date for FTSE review is it not for index inclusion?

[wolfhound1] 24/2/2016 16:08

As it is quoted in Germany you may not be getting price updates properly. Bloomberg has it at €34 down €8.68 -20%

ticker is WDI:GR

[nurdin] 24/2/2016 16:03

Well couldnt resist adding a few more..

edit :but should have waited lol

[reddave999] 24/2/2016 16:00

Agreed lomax99 :)

[lomax99] 24/2/2016 15:56

ProperCharlie's Wikipedia Zatara tie in with Gotham is a clear read across to Gotham City Research's paper on Quindell.

(Initially topped up too early on this last time it had a lurch downwards, needs to be in at least the 350's this time.... )

[wolfhound1] 24/2/2016 15:48

I would guess Wirepay are currently investigating exactly who Zatara are - probably incorporated in some tin pot country with a 99 yr old granny in early stages of dementia as MD and capital of $1.....website was only registered on the 17th. The only name I could see was a Mark Hoffman a CPA with a PO Box in Califoria who registered the domain.......... nothing like a request for transparency from a "research" company that is itself opaque...bad wiff

I could see the FT being left holding the bag here and winding up in a very expensive lawsuit.....I see they closed comments

well hope you don't leave this too long to top up lomax - next weeks chip paper

[lomax99] 24/2/2016 15:42

Another lurch down and I will be topping up.....

[jarega85] 24/2/2016 15:38

Or mine! We should be competing with the big boys soon!