We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
---|---|---|---|
Paternoster Res | PRS | London | Ordinary Share |
Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.095 | 0.095 |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 09/10/2018 08:27 by isa2020 Great PPG result - unexpected income from Gas sites, as a larger shareholder PRS should get pulled back up.If PPG sell their stake in any site and redistribute funds to shareholders - PRS are looking at a cash injection - direct to button line. |
Posted at 19/9/2018 13:36 by isa2020 PRS has significantly reduce its loss after tax to GBP97,482 compared to a loss after tax of GBP793,959 for the same period in 2017. the Company's net assets to GBP7,416,437 compared to GBP2,448,769 as at 31 December 2017 - share account is at 3M tooThat's an improvement from last 4 reports. |
Posted at 14/9/2018 08:31 by isa2020 As PRS owns a large chuck of PPG, the current movement should pull this up a tab |
Posted at 09/7/2018 12:19 by alexios1201 7.95% James Caird Investments LtdAnother fundhttps://www.inve |
Posted at 26/6/2018 10:03 by tomboyb Why would u ever leave PRS? -There is simply no need to - Its too cushy - |
Posted at 23/5/2018 12:34 by cpap man Not in here bp but yes PRS has been an extremely poor investment over the years! |
Posted at 22/5/2018 06:18 by gheebee Let's vote in favour of massive dilution shall we, fellow turkeys? |
Posted at 10/4/2018 14:30 by cpap man Looking at the share price action it looks very much as though NL is staying on at PRS for now any way! |
Posted at 27/2/2018 20:40 by outspan Corporate rather than personal but let's hope so! Profit for them is essential if ordinary punters are ever to be joyful.As I see it, James Lewis clearly straddles both entities and for his initial entity to make roughly 27% in about 6 weeks before passing the holding on to his other entity strongly suggests that decent uplift is still seen from .14p - quite the reverse of a dump, I would suggest. More that it appears to add to the emerging New Year notion of better times ahead for PRS and, very unlike previously, the (new) big boys want to hold a good chunk of what's coming. That Riverfort has now consequentially taken a direct stake in its new "partner" (RNS 18 Jan refers) whereby PRS "...will work closely with and co-invest alongside RiverFort in a range of opportunities within the natural resources sector..." only serves to add to the sense that very good things are foreseen (for the PRS SP) by the same people involved in bringing those things to fruition. Can't ask for a better pointer than that IMHO. |
Posted at 26/1/2018 09:55 by gheebee Might not be a death spiral this time. Shard and Riverfort are intermeshed at board level and Shard's boss has just bought in. Miton is a big holder and Neo hasn't done a holding RNS so he's still in there. Bruce Rowan too. There's no mine to dig, well to drill or survey to conduct let alone pay for.I reckon this is something else. There's something in the portfolio that is either so good or so toxic it can't be left to Lee, Peterhouse and Beaumont Cornish to manage. I reckon this non-update is probably Lee's resignation letter. It can't have helped his chances of hanging on by letting Eridge Capital(cost to PRS in 2015, c£250k. Value to PRS in 2018, c£0k. Eridge payments and fees to Lee in 2016 alone £82k) commit at least one offence, possibly more, under Jersey company law that could get it fined and him locked up. Before anyone shouts defamation, it's in Arts 87(2) and 109 of CJL 1991. Check and compare it with the Calling Notice for the 2017 AGM on Eridge website for yourself. Then email the company to let them know! |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions