Parallel Media (LSE:PAA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2020 to Jan 2025
Plains Resources Inc. Board of Directors Receives Letter From
Vulcan Energy Corporation
HOUSTON, July 19 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The following was released today by
Plains Resources Inc. (NYSE:PLX):
VULCAN ENERGY CORPORATION
505 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
July 18, 2004
Via Facsimile (832) 239-6210
Plains Resources Inc.
700 Milam Street, Suite 3100
Houston, Texas 77002
Attn: Board of Directors
Gentlemen:
In an effort to ensure that everyone has the most current and
accurate information, we thought that it was important to reiterate that
$17.25 per share is Vulcan Energy's best and final offer. As you know,
we believe the $17.25 per share price is a full and fair price for Plains
Resources' shares and represents a significant premium over the value of
Plains Resources' shares on a stand-alone basis, even after consummation
of any feasible leveraged recapitalization. We are confident that the
vast majority of your stockholders will recognize this. In addition, as
we have discussed, Leucadia's suggested leveraged recapitalization is not
a proposal to engage in a transaction with Leucadia and provides no basis
to actually effectuate any such transaction. Furthermore, in reviewing
any correspondence you receive from Leucadia, you should remember that
(i) they pursued their March 19th proposal despite the fact that they did
not understand the tax issues associated with the structure of the
proposal and (ii) they repeatedly refused to sign a confidentiality
agreement, to the end that they have conducted no due diligence on Plains
Resources.
We believe that our position is strongly supported by the following.
-- Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) has consistently
recommended that Plains Resources' stockholders should vote for the
Vulcan Energy merger. ISS is widely recognized as the nation's
leading independent proxy advisory firm. Its analyses and
recommendations are relied upon by hundreds of major institutional
investment firms, mutual funds and fiduciaries throughout the United
States;
-- Greg Armstrong, the Chief Executive Officer of Plains All American
(PAA), has informed us that he never discussed with Leucadia their
July 7th proposal, and that he has voted his personal share holdings
in Plains Resources in favor of the $17.25 per share Vulcan Energy
merger. Mr. Armstrong has also indicated to us that he views the
Vulcan Energy transaction as a positive from PAA's perspective;
-- Over seven months have elapsed since our original proposal and no bona
fide competing proposal has been made; and
-- The $17.25 per share merger consideration represents an approximate
30% premium over the average closing price of $13.23 per share of
Plains Resources common stock over the 30-calendar day period ending
on November 20, 2003, and an approximate 28% premium over the $13.44
per share closing price of Plains Resources common stock on the same
date, the last full trading day prior to the public announcement of
our original proposal.
We believe that Leucadia's analysis of a leveraged recapitalization
is based on seriously flawed fundamental assumptions and that Leucadia's
model is fraught with inaccuracies, including the following:
-- Leucadia overstates the amount of cash available for Plains Resources
to repurchase its shares by between $47 million and $54 million.
* Plains Resources' net debt (before the suggested
recapitalization) is approximately $15 million higher than
assumed by Leucadia.
* The sale of Calumet Florida is likely to realize $10 million to
$15 million less than assumed by Leucadia.
* The transaction suggested by Leucadia would require the payment
of our $15 million termination fee (notwithstanding Leucadia's
assertion to the contrary).
* Leucadia fails to take into account between $5 million and
$7 million in expenses incurred by Plains Resources in
connection with the Vulcan Energy transaction.
* Leucadia's analysis fails to account for 280G gross-up payments
that would likely be payable under the existing employment
agreements for Messrs. Flores and Raymond in connection with the
suggested recapitalization.
-- Leucadia's model relies on several overly optimistic assumptions
regarding PAA, including assuming a 2005 distribution which is $0.28
above the mid point of PAA guidance, as well as unrealistic
assumptions with respect to the pricing, timing and integration of
acquisitions.
-- Leucadia also relies on several inaccurate assumptions regarding
Plains Resources, including underestimating annual G&A by $0.5 million
and overstating Plains Resources' NOLs by approximately $15 million.
-- Leucadia's conclusions rely on the assumption that, post-
recapitalization, Plains Resources' stock would trade at 15 times free
cash flow. We believe this assumption is unreasonable because:
-- Prior to the beginning of this sales process on
November 19, 2003, following the spin-off of PXP,
Plains Resources had generally traded at a multiple of
12.5 times free cash flow, and interest rates have
increased substantially in the intervening period; and
-- Kinder Morgan Inc. currently trades at a multiple of
approximately 13 times free cash flow, which is at the
top end of the comparable range, particularly given
that Kinder Morgan Energy Partners generally trades at
a lower yield than PAA.
-- In addition, Leucadia's valuation applies its free cash flow multiple
to NOL-shielded after-tax cash flows, effectively valuing the NOL at a
multiple, which is inappropriate because it is a one-time item.
We are committed to completing our $17.25 per share all-cash
transaction with Plains Resources.
Respectfully,
/s/ David N. Capobianco
David N. Capobianco
Vice President
cc: R. Joel Swanson, Baker Botts L.L.P
DATASOURCE: Plains Resources Inc.
CONTACT: E. Lynn Hill of Plains Resources Inc., +1-832-239-6185
Web site: http://www.plainsresources.com/