We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osmetech | LSE:OMH | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B0K29R51 |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 2.15 | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 2.15 | GBX |
Osmetech (OMH) Share Charts1 Year Osmetech Chart |
|
1 Month Osmetech Chart |
Intraday Osmetech Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/3/2017 | 14:24 | Osmetech: Star Trek technology today. The real McCoy | 9,547 |
| 25/7/2013 | 00:35 | ЈЈ......Osmetech ......Smell the Success.....ЈЈ | 31,148 |
| 20/7/2012 | 20:21 | "You Stupid Boy" Trout | 19 |
| 15/6/2010 | 23:25 | OMH a free speech thread unmoderated by bangers | 4,694 |
| 21/3/2010 | 20:13 | JIMMY WILL DELIVER | 8 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 05/1/2013 12:38 by ditchpig Bargain at the current price topping up, last changce to get on board before she sails.space ship on the launch pad counting down. blah blah blah |
Posted at 15/6/2010 23:25 by ditchpig Atleast the share price graph here looks a little more positive.lol |
Posted at 29/5/2010 13:24 by roobarb36 Yep, rather miffed myself but as a long term OMH masochist I suppose I should always expect the worst and not be surprised by things like this. Now we can guess what the numerous delays where to the implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement was about, notably the drop in price from $8 - $10 down to an eventual $6, which dropped again on the first few trades. After Osmetechs first attempt failed completely at the very start of the credit crunch it was odds on they would time their next attempt perfectly with the next global financial crisis. I suppose the only thing you could say is at least we are up and running now as it would have been disastrous, probably terminal if it had been pulled again. On the latest update to the Scheme of arrangement we have "Conditional dealings commences in Genmark Fundraising Shares" for May 28th and "Commencement of trading in the NASDAQ Global Markets in Genmark including in relation to Genmark Fundraising Shares." for June 3rd 2:30pm. Anyone know what is the essential difference between the terminologies used here for the two trading dates stated and the implications with regard to actual trading come June 3rd ? The one thing I did notice yesterday after the initial pricing shock was the sheer volume of trade in approx 1.5 hours before the close with over half a million shares traded at $5 plus a share. That equates very roughly to £1.7 million pounds worth of trade in an hour and a half. Even in early January when we saw massive, unprecedented volume of approx 45 million in one full day at around 2p a share that was still just short of a million pounds worth of trade. This was and still remains a long term play for me and this is just another blip, albeit it in a long line of annoying blips, but had decided some time ago that I would not sell until the AD-8 is on the market. Fingers crossed that June 3rd is better than May 28th otherwise I will have to go back to hiding behind the couch again. |
Posted at 25/5/2010 11:51 by joey_the_lips Is it today that the GenMark shares are appearing on the Nasdaq? I'm still a bit confused but it seems that I will get 1 GNMK share for every 230 OMH shares. GNMK are a new offering on the Nasdaq with 4.5 million shares being issued at what is estimated will be $8-$10 per share. This values your OMH shares at between 2.4 and 2.9 pence. Not a bad premium on what they were trading for over the past few weeks. This thread could run on for years. |
Posted at 19/5/2010 17:55 by whilest2 Marvin, please get some psychiatric help. This thread will close and you will be all alone with your nightmare thoughts about OMH,and there will be no one to aim at - and perish the thought, but the share price might be glorious....Anyone here got any ideas about how to help Marvin? |
Posted at 17/5/2010 09:54 by whilest2 There are various sites on which u can get NASDAQ prices on the web. I assume US investors will open a thread. See the current market price for OMH just about corresponds with the estimated starting price in the US with the $ getting better in our favour |
Posted at 11/5/2010 10:59 by roobarb36 Nice one whilest. Unfortunately cannot add anymore due to insufficient funds but would love to do so.Was thinking how unlucky can we get as history seems to be repeating itself as the markets hit a crisis point worldwide for the second time in 18 months. This combined with the uncertainty over the U.K. government just as we about to float in the U.S. and you start to believe OMH is cursed. Presumably the U.S. float price is determined by many factors one of which will be the U.K.share price over a pre determined period in the run up to the de-listing. If we had not seen the current market instability I'm certain the price would have been more than it is now and consequently the float price would have been higher. All this is a temporary annoyance but if the float is successful I'm sure our reasoning, bravery and tenacity will eventually be rewarded. Hopefully I will make enough in the next few years on the Nasdaq to replace the hair I have pulled out over the last 12 invested in OMH in the U.K. |
Posted at 23/4/2010 16:55 by novine The only way is up - if this recession did not kill it nothing will the share price will probably go up considerably from this level so no wonder that some are buying on pure potential speculations which will come with fresh funding no brainer really I might even persuade myself to buy some |
Posted at 16/4/2010 17:09 by roobarb36 Whilest -Did he, I've had Marvin on Filter for a while now so have been blissfully unaware that I was a moron but if he did say that then fair enough, I must bow to his insider knowledge. At least you and I and a few others know its a gamble at this stage and are prepared to take a calcualted risk. If it does go belly up we will have nobody to blame but ourselves and I for one will not waste the next 10 years of my life bleating about this and that and laughing at others who have lost money after they have "seen the light". Who in all honesty can ever say they always time their trades perfectly. You have to make a judgement call, and if it falls, accept no one made you buy the shares,take it on the chin and decide whether to bale out,stick or twist. I know with Jon Faiz Kayem and Chris Gleeson heavily invested at much higher prices with their own money, not cut price options, along with a few pension companies and institutions both here and in the States I feel a little less concerned with the short term fluctuations in the share price and more confident in the long term viability of the company. The previous Nasdaq float was pulled through no fault of their own and as I have said before they would have thought long and hard before they had another shot at it. Usually when they they do things like this they would like a positive announcement or two shortly before or shortly after the float to get it up and running and bring it to the attention of potential new investors who are not as jaded or cynical as some on here are. The huge volume in early January also suggests to me that many other people with big pockets and people to answer to have decided it is now an interesting entry point. Sorry, what am I thinking, I should just say zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz and be put back in my place. |
Posted at 02/12/2009 16:32 by roobarb36 Did not want more dilution but in this market they had no real option at the company's stage of development and did very well to attain a placing price above the current share priceMust admit that the price stagnating for so long around the 2p mark at a time when everyone knew they were in need of money smacked at a placing at or about this price. One can only assume that the market must have had wind of this potential funding or I'm sure with the lack of buying activity over the last few months the price would have continued to fall. Also the impressive video presentation on OMH's website again suggested that they were making a real effort to get their house in order to impress potential financiers during a difficult fund raising environment. Lets hope that Mr Kayyem, released from his Efficacy duties and Mr Gleeson can give OMH shareholders a little hope after 10 years of abject misery. It takes a long time to turn around negative perceptions but so far they've done about all they could have given the difficult circumstances. It is also reassuring that Mr Kayyem bought bucket loads of shares in the region of 17.5p and so he must be desperate to prove his investment was not as foolish as some would have you believe. May take some considerable time yet but lets hope he can prove the doubters wrong, big style. |
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
