We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oakley Capital Investments Limited | LSE:OCI | London | Ordinary Share | BMG670131058 | ORD 1P (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.00 | 0.85% | 477.00 | 474.00 | 480.00 | 477.00 | 474.00 | 474.00 | 321,422 | 15:25:27 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit Inv Tr, Closed-end Mgmt | 57.09M | 47.49M | 0.2692 | 17.72 | 841.52M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
19/11/2019 09:06 | The liquidity of ICG Enterprise trust and Oakley are different - here I have struggled to buy £20k blocks (I've done 2x 10k shares this am). ICG enterprise trust you can happily trade blocks of £100k.... I have DMA through Interactive broker - maybe should be using that instead of HL, but wanted these in a SIPP! | nimbo1 | |
19/11/2019 09:04 | Specto - I remember that one well - as I only recently sold out Let's hope for similar here eh? | joe say | |
19/11/2019 09:03 | I think the liquidity of both is similar. I like ICG and being able to interact with the order book but the algos that frequently go better bid than me by 2p for a handful of shares annoy me. Equally, you will see algos hitting a bid in small size repeatedly. In OCI I only use the intraday auctions. Doesn't mean I always get the stock I want. If you don't have access to a user-friendly market-maker, in these names I think you need a combination of patience and luck! | 1968jon | |
19/11/2019 08:47 | Icg enterprise trust also looks like a good idea. And it’s liquid. Here I haven’t been able to buy more than 10k shares which means its illiquid despite the seemingly huge transactions going through! | nimbo1 | |
19/11/2019 08:36 | Well spotted, missed those - more Invesco? Late-reported? Still waiting on an RNS. Anyone remember FPEO? Changed name to BPET. Similar PE to OCI, went from big discount to par/small premium. Currently 366/373 vs last reported NAV of 388. I reckon OCI may be up to £1 below current NAV (end-June figure 318p) & expect it to eventually get near to par, with the growth they've been seeing. But then I would say that :) Sold out of FPEO too soon, believing a smaller discount made it a sell, & not planning to make same mistake with OCI. | spectoacc | |
19/11/2019 08:26 | Three trades totalling 4m from yesterday morning printed after the close yesterday. | 1968jon | |
19/11/2019 08:13 | took some on the open but won't let me buy anymore without nt. | nimbo1 | |
18/11/2019 23:33 | BPM 266/276 just sayin | shaker44 | |
18/11/2019 16:09 | 224/229. Just sayin'. | spectoacc | |
18/11/2019 15:55 | Buys gone from 221.62p on a 220/224 spread on Friday, to now 226p on a 223/226 spread - looking good, but still no Holdings RNS. | spectoacc | |
18/11/2019 13:36 | Need to see at least one further Holdings RNS but on evidence so far, the overhang seems to be (temporarily?) over. | spectoacc | |
16/11/2019 16:17 | If Invesco are selling I might be inclined to celebrate. Hold a small amount here and was tempted to add a few, but held off. Look at the extraordinary premium 3i now sells on, then again look at their dividend growth. And increasingly investors are looking for income, that rather than just NAV drives valuation. | essentialinvestor | |
15/11/2019 15:15 | The buying today might be down to two mentions in the IC in their "Investment Trust recommendations" section, where managers pick their favourite Trusts for the year. In the "Growth" part, OCI got two of the four tips. Nothing said that we don't know already, other than a reminder that TMO has gone from being a drag on NAV, to beneficial to it. | spectoacc | |
15/11/2019 13:15 | Just tried to add. No longer allowed at Iweb. | shaker44 | |
15/11/2019 12:57 | If Invesco are selling, they must love this stock as opposed to , say, MVI. The swift action of the company and its directors underpins the price, allows them to sell close to the market and maintains confidence thereby protecting their remaining investment value. Over at MVI they appear between a rock and a hard place. The only downside is the success of this may encourage them to do it some more | makinbuks | |
15/11/2019 09:02 | Agreed, the big advantage with OCI is it's trading miles below NAV. Is also the best (IMO) listed p/e IT & can expect the NAV to keep growing. But then we would say that :) | spectoacc | |
15/11/2019 08:54 | I think post Woodford all small/mid-cap/AIM stocks are having a hard time. This is the only stock I follow with a large Invesco stake - and they are certainly under media pressure. It has been observable for some time that someone has been showing large offers in the auction. I would be pleased if it was announced that it was Invesco lightening up. As with when Woodford got out (though again there were large offers around before the block trade/placing) I thought it encouraging that it was done within a whisker of the bid/offer at the time. Same here. I think an existing shareholder or a new value investor who buys the investment case has been found and is prepared to wait it out. | 1968jon | |
15/11/2019 08:51 | Some good buying this morning but all inside - guessing Thommo will have something to say about it. Still want confirmation of who the seller is tho. | spectoacc | |
15/11/2019 08:47 | Liberum; Event Peter Dubens, co-founder and Managing Partner of the Oakley Capital Group, has acquired a further 258k shares in Oakley Capital Investments at a total cost of £0.6m. He now holds 15.1m shares (7.5% shareholding) in the company. In addition, David Till, co-founder and senior partner of Oakley Capital Group, acquired £75k of shares and now holds 0.29% of the company. Liberum view Principals of the investment manager and board members have invested a total of £30m in the shares since October 2016. Peter Dubens, the founder of Oakley Capital, is the third largest shareholder in the listed fund. The scale of the investment demonstrates confidence in the prospects for future NAV performance. We believe the current 30% discount offers an excellent relative value opportunity. The underlying portfolio companies are delivering 30%+ EBITDA growth and are typically in sectors which demonstrate resilience to the wider economic cycle. We expect the portfolio will continue to drive strong NAV growth (our forecasts imply a NAV CAGR of 14.3% over the next two and a half years). | davebowler | |
15/11/2019 08:29 | Good point, couldn't see them on my system & they include Dubens' purchase. Question is - who took the rest... Still think it's Invesco selling, altho there's other potential candidates & Invesco still have a lot more. | spectoacc | |
15/11/2019 08:22 | What about the prints that went through after the close last night? Over 7m shares. | 1968jon | |
15/11/2019 07:24 | Interesting! Two director buys, Dubens' of decent size, but at 222.5p and not part of the 220p's. | spectoacc | |
14/11/2019 15:44 | Agreed. Think we can safely say the trades are today's, based just on the 1.8m buyback RNS being today too, but due to the price being identical (220p to the decimal place) I'm betting that's someone selling 4,457,000 shares, of which the co has bought 1.8m & the MMs having found homes for the rest. The 160k is timed a minute later so might be wrong on that one. Not much more than 2% of the co/10% of Invesco's total holding mind. 221.5ish to buy this morning, implying the seller was "out there". MMs no doubt contacted OCI. Edit - RNS just out confirming the 1.8m bought by the co at 220p, & hadn't realised cancelled rather than in Treasury, so down to 202m in issue. | spectoacc | |
14/11/2019 15:40 | Always tricky trying to match them up, particularly as I don't know the reporting rules about publishing large trades in this stock. My gut is that the four trades at 220 printed between 12.00.40 and 12.00.58 and possibly the one at 12.21.47 were connected. It's a very precise price for a RFQ quote. But who knows? Fun watching. I have noticed someone showing decent offers in the auction for a while but they have been absent for the last few days. | 1968jon | |
14/11/2019 15:25 | @1968Jon - yes, but what of the 677k? I think it's a series of trades, notwithstanding the 1.82m/1.8m may be two sides of one of them (but again - explain why there aren't two trades near enough to the 677k too). | spectoacc |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions