
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nthn.Foods | LSE:NFDS | London | Ordinary Share | GB0006466089 | ORD 25P |
Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
- |
Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | O | 0 | 75.00 | GBX |
Northern Foods (NFDS) Share Charts1 Year Northern Foods Chart |
|
1 Month Northern Foods Chart |
Intraday Northern Foods Chart |
Date | Time | Title | Posts |
---|---|---|---|
21/6/2025 | 06:18 | Northern Foods - a Tasty Choice! | 95,209 |
24/3/2024 | 00:08 | Northen Foods | 1,748 |
07/2/2019 | 14:50 | NFDS YUMMY | 1 |
28/5/2009 | 03:15 | NFDS | 6 |
11/8/2008 | 16:56 | Ready Meals the growth area | 4 |
Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
---|
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 19/6/2025 17:15 by aleman Coffee's 5-year average before the recent spike was a little under 200 cents/lb. It spiked to a peak of 433 in Feb but has now fallen 27% to 317. It now looks over which is why there's all the late media scaremongering. It always seems to come after, rather than at the time.It takes 20g of ground coffee to make a cup of coffee so that wholesale increase (not including pakaging and distribution) added about 10 cents to the cost at the recent 433c/lb price. The latest price now suggests a 5c/4p rise per bought cup in a cafe - but it looks set to fall further. Coffee in a cafe has risen much more than that in the last year so it is mainly rising for OTHER reasons. h ttps://www.reddit.co 20g of ground coffee makes about 3-4g of instant so a 100g jar might have gone up roughly £2 at the supermarket due to commodity coffee price increases but that has now quickly halved again and looks set fall further. Watch out for price gouging. Hopefully, there's more competition than the petrol market! |
Posted at 19/6/2025 12:48 by aleman The Bank of England voted 6-3 to keep the Bank Rate steady at 4.25% at its June meeting, navigating a challenging backdrop of heightened global uncertainty and persistent inflationary pressure. Three members favored a 0.25 percentage point cut to 4%, though investors had expected a 7-2 split. The central bank noted that consumer price inflation is likely to remain broadly at current rates for the rest of the year before easing back toward the target next year. However, it warned of “two-sided risks to inflation,” expressing concern over rising energy prices amid the escalating Middle East conflict and potential trade disruptions from proposed US tariffs.So B of E is not cutting due to Middle East hostilities raising the oil price and threatening inflation, while other central banks cut because of the increased uncertainty M.E hostilities and Trump are having on global trade? How do global uncertainties have an opposite effect on us? Is the UK not on this planet? The UK has amongst the highest taxes on refined oil products so oil prices rises should effect us less than most other countries. I missed the deteriorating figures from Whitbread earlier, although the shares are only down modestly. It does not seem to bode well for other UK consumer-facing industries. Oh dear, there's more: Morrisons is aiming to make a further £300m in cost cuts in the next 18 months – raising fears of further job cuts – as the retailer says inflation is driving “subdued consumer sentiment”. The Bradford-based supermarket chain, which employs 95,000 people in its 500 supermarkets and about 1,700 convenience stores, said it had already exceeded its target of £700m in savings – after cutting about 300 jobs with the closure of cafes, some small stores, florists and hot food counters, and was now aiming for a total of £1bn. |
Posted at 18/6/2025 15:49 by mrphil Just been having a closer look at TEK to try to understand why the shares are doing so badly and I must be reading something wrong as their 2024 report claims their share price rose by 27% in 2024. I'm guessing they are going by the all time low they were sitting at towards the end of 2023 and forgetting the fact that they rose dramatically during 2024 only to end almost back where they started! Having originally paid around 21p and then seeing them reach 30p, it is a little galling to now be sitting on a paper loss of around 65%. Maybe they will fly someday! |
Posted at 01/6/2025 12:11 by wllmherk My top 5 holdings by weighting:1.SEQI...9.31% 2.GCP....7.37% 3.NCYF...6.30% 4.MNG....6.19% 5.CSN....5.05% I'll be looking to trim the top 3 as I don't want to have more than 6% in any one stock. The problem is what to buy with the proceeds as all the dividend paying stocks I like have risen a lot in the last 5 weeks. I was looking at MGCI, current yield 8.90%, I think someone on here might have mentioned them, apologies, can't recall who it was. Anyway, they invest in debt, 70% of which is investment grade, both private and public, the NAV seems very stable as does the share price. They provide a hedge against rising interest rates and some ballast for my wife's ISA. Barring any stockmarket shocks early next week I'll be adding a few of these. wllm :) |
Posted at 31/5/2025 12:29 by mcunliffe1 wllm, appreciate your concern. They are fine now but very uneasy in the first couple of weeks after the break-in. Time heals many issues.UPDATE: we kept Charlie in the UK. The police were not interested. The stolen car was spotted on some police camera about 10 miles NW of their house. This event is what caused me to push my MP to obtain information about ANPR cameras etc. In respect of movements in my SIPP, on 24th Dec 2024 (I went on hol. on 27th) the total pot value was £215,900 (rounded down to nearest £100). At close yesterday it was £235,100. I have taken £24,000 draw-down in mid March 2025 and dividends have been retained within the SIPP. Interest is paid by ii on the cash balances - both $ and £. So, £216k rising to £259k (£235k + £24k) is a 19.9% rise. In that period I reinvested dividends into the same holding of shares for BATS and DGE and for the most recent RECI dividend. I sold 1200 PHNX 1 May 2025 but retained the cash in the SIPP. These are the growths per holding since 27 Dec 2024. I should state though that these are the percentage changes in the share price of each share. I don't always re-invest the dividends. ABDN 18.37 BATS 10.83 DGE -19.4 LGEN 5.78 PHNX 24.8 RECI 1.62 RR 43.03 SBLK 11.47 SDIP -5.41 TFIF 1.85 |
Posted at 28/5/2025 12:59 by mcunliffe1 Skinny: what an interesting tread your first link provided. Way down near the end was this para:"The review was meant to report in the first half of 2025, but is expected to be delayed until autumn, much to Hill’s frustration (“everyone knows what’s in it. It’s just the whole politics of finding a time.”) Its release has been shrouded in secrecy amid reports that it will recommend protecting critical infrastructure through the creation of a home guard, uncharitably compared to dad’s army – Hill dismisses this as “rubbish” If this is a reference to the 11 June Spending Review the implication that Rolls Royce being named as one of the two (or the only) winner of the SMR race - being itself delayed - cannot be dismissed. Interesting that she confirms 'everyone knows what's in it'. If RR is a winner that may explain the two day jump in RR's share price (because everyone knows). |
Posted at 29/4/2025 11:46 by mcunliffe1 Morning all.Brucie, I noted all of your stated holdings, at least, those I do not also own, and then started to look through them individually. I had two sheets; the first held 15 shares alphabetically ordered. The pattern seemed to me to be repeated as I went down the list but hit a snag at HEFL. Now realise it's probably HFEL instead. That pattern, at least in the first 15 checked, is one of a falling share price over a five year period. HFEL peaked at 326p in April 2021. It is now 210p. 10 year chart is slightly worse. So, it appears that contrary to HFEL's stated Investment Strategy - namely: "The Company seeks to provide shareholders with a growing total annual dividend per share, as well as capital appreciation, from a diversified portfolio of investments from the Asia Pacific region." Is not achieved in respect of capital appreciation. Had an investment been made at 260p in March 2023 (when I opened my SIPP) I'd be nursing a capital loss but would have presumably enjoyed quarterly dividends hovering around the 6.1p or 6.2p each quarter. Back of an envelope calculation implies that if I'd reinvested the dividends I would own far more shares that the start, but at a lower value share price I'd be in profit but not massively so. My conclusion - for what little such is worth - lies in investing in these trusts when the share price is at a low point and hoping that a rise follows. Obvious I suppose. 7th April 2025 may turn out to have a good entry point. I mention this not in any malicious manner as I hold RECI, SDIP and TFIF and of these, SDIP is letting me down. I bought £5k on 6 Nov 2024 at £7.1392 each - 700 shares. They are now valued at £4,429 - so a loss of £571. I have received dividends since purchase of $276.50 and at approx. 1.33 dollar rate that's about £208. RECI and TFIF are far better, both showing blue in their valuation and, of course, I've had the dividends from both with TFIF paying me about £700 that has NOT been able to auto reinvest. I count my blessings in perhaps buying RECI and TFIF at a low point. |
Posted at 26/4/2025 18:04 by mcunliffe1 I tried to work out the weekly and ytd gains on my SIPP and gave up some months back. I don't use a spreadsheet. I do however note the total value of my SIPP and the displayed 'gain' that ii show. The latter being the sum of the holdings gains or losses. Primarily, because of RR I am up.Back on Dec 24th 2024 just before my wife and I left for a long holiday my SIPP was valued at £215,900 and the 'gain' was showing at £6,124. I drew-down £24,000 in mid March 2025 - from CASH holdings I should add, no selling needed. At close on Friday the SIPP was valued at £213,200 and the 'gain' was £25,958 I've had £468 dividends paid to me in the period that I have retained as cash and £530 that has been reinvested. I calculate the true rise to be 9.86% if the £24k is added back. I hold ABDN BATS DGE LGEN PHNX RECI RR SBLK SDIP and TFIF. I count RR as a growth holding with the rest meant to be dividend payers. SBLK and DGE are currently letting down the side but over time I'm hoping they recover the share price loss and whilst I wait I am getting a small yield. Thanks for sharing your list Brucie, next week I will look at those you hold that I don't and see if I can juggle my holding a little as I'm quite overweight with RR just now. It kills me to consider top-slicing RR though as an announcement on SMR's, if favourable, will push it higher. I'd also like to think that SBLK will improve when it's realised that container shipping may suffer massively with the tariffs but bulk shipping shouldn't as stuff still needs to be made somewhere and the raw materials need to me moved from the ground to the new manufacturing location. |
Posted at 16/4/2025 17:17 by blueliner +0.42% folio, [FTSE All-Share +0.28%]BA., AEWU, NG., SREI, PLUS share price hits £30, leading risers. Turned into a sunny afternoon but a bracing breeze 13C. Just finished watching 'This City Is Ours' good cast, acting and the Scouse accent off to a tee. |
Posted at 26/2/2025 16:08 by mcunliffe1 I can't say I am fully aware of how the Price Cap works but it appears to me to be a mechanism designed to minimise the risk of an energy supplier going bankrupt.Before the most recent energy spikes and then into the start of that rise several quite large energy suppliers went belly-up. Their customers are guaranteed continuance of supply and at some point a Supplier of Last Resort (SoLR) is appointed by ofgem to take over those customers. And to take over any indebtedness due to the customers. For domestic customers, their credit balances are protected. Not so for business customers. They become simple creditors of the supplier. But it's the SoLR who must refund those credit balance domestic customers and who in turn recovers that money from the ofgem fund. That fund is created by our standing charges (in part). I found this link: Buried within it states this: "But under current rules the new supplier does not get the customer credit balances from the failed supplier, so the costs of replacing those balances are currently shared across all consumer bills." The above was taken from a press release dated 20 June 2022. What had been happening prior to these somewhat late changes was unforgivable. Energy suppliers were using their customer's credit balances as working capital and when they went bust that money simply disappeared. Some of it will have gone into the pay and bonus packages of the failed company's directors and owners. Our money. So, it seems to me that the Price Cap is a mechanism whereby the risk assumed on behalf of a failed energy company is front-loaded by paying higher bills with some new ring-fencing being imposed upon the supplier. Either way, the consumer if ultimately paying to protect the risk. How easy for ofgem to simply raise the current Price Cap (as we leave winter in the Northern hemisphere) ensuring there'll be fewer collapses primarily because the suppliers are all making sh1t loads of money. Centrica's share price seems to like it. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions