We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northcoders Group Plc | CODE | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 151.00 | 08:00:09 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 151.00 | 145.50 | 151.00 | 151.00 | 151.00 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| SOFTWARE & COMPUTER SERVICES |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 04/2/2022 10:18 by fillipe CODE - flying high today!f |
Posted at 11/11/2021 09:44 by 74tom Nice one filipe, I think it has to go down as the most under the radar IPO of 2021. As you say the ticker is fantastic and they have a distinctive name, both really important fundamentals.I just can't believe how tight the float is now, it'll be a struggle for a new buyer to get 5000 shares nevermind a more significant position... And with the market cap at just £15.5m, who's going to be selling? When I bought in I used Wey Eduction as a guide to what Northcoders could be valued at a few years down the line. They were acquired by Inspired Eduction for £70.4m in April 21 ; Some extracts from that RNS; "Wey Education employed 141 employees on average in the year ended 31 August 2020, had annual turnover of £8.4 million and made a profit before tax of £0.5 million." "At the time of the trading update, being 13 January 2021, the market expectations the Wey Education Board were referring to were those of the forecasts included in the equity research note published by WH Ireland on 10 November 2020 ("Equity Research Note"). In this research note, the equity analyst forecasted for the year ended 31 August 2021 adjusted profit before tax of £1.3 million." If Wey went for £70.4m then surely CODE looks very cheap at it's current level, particularly as we are already profitable... a future expansion with sites in Birmingham, Newcastle, Sheffield & Nottingham to add to those in Manchester & Leeds should boost revenue further. No reason to think that won't be followed by Liverpool, Edinburgh, Glasgow etc etc. Exciting times ahead! |
Posted at 09/11/2021 11:28 by fillipe I'm delighted to have bought CODE in July of this year.Great to see the "CODE" ticker was got by Northcoders ....a stroke of genius there. Similarly the "Northcoders" title ... another tick-up for the geographical North! Shares were freely available to buy at the time and I should have taken more last July. This one's a long term hold for me as I see the future will bear much success for the business and its shareholders. f |
Posted at 25/10/2021 08:25 by 74tom Northcoders Group plc, an independent provider of training programmes for software coding, is delighted to announce its proposed admission to trading on AIM (the "Admission") and placing and subscription, conditional on Admission (the "Fundraising"), of 1,944,444 new ordinary shares of one penny each ("Ordinary Shares"), at a price of 180 pence per share (the "Placing Price").The Fundraising will raise a total of £3.5 million (before expenses). WH Ireland Limited ("WH Ireland") and Peterhouse Capital Limited ("Peterhouse") have acted as joint placing agents. WH Ireland is acting as Nominated Advisor and Broker to the Company. Admission and commencement of dealings on AIM are expected to take place at 8 a.m. on 27 July 2021, under the ticker CODE. Based on the Placing Price, the market capitalisation of the Company will be £12.5 million on Admission. On Admission, the Company will have 6,944,445 Ordinary Shares in issue and a free float of approximately 29.6 per cent. Admission Document : Significant Shareholders (From admission doc & website) Christopher David Hill 1,523,668 21.94% David Geraint Llewellyn 1,239,444 17.8% Amul Batra 969,000 13.95% Amati Global Investors 1,000,000 14.4% Stephen Nigel Hill 519,444 7.5% Anil Batra 500,000 7.2% Vela Technologies plc 416,667 6.0% Tom St John Harrison Walton 296,322 4.27% Jude Nottingham 50,000 0.7% Janet Hill 41,667 0.6% Sandra ("Sandy") Lindsay 5,000 0.1% Total Shares held by above 11 shareholders : 6,561,211 Total Shares in issue : 6,944,445 Estimated remaining float : ~383,234 5.51% Website : Investor Site : |
Posted at 23/9/2002 21:54 by zzaxx99 There may well be codes on the trades transmitted into the LSE (and in fact must be, thinking about it), but on the trades published by the LSE (which is what we see on the Trades list), I'm 99.99999% convinced that the broker / MM are not identified.I believe that the published transaction code forms a unique key into a transactional record within the LSE, but that the details of the record to which that key relates, are not released outside the LSE. In fact, the LSE guarantees anonymity of the counterparties, so (although some educated guessing can take place), the code cannot have identity encoded within in. Before that thread appeared on the PBB, I'd done a bit of peering at trade reports myself - my conclusion then was that, on stocks with few MMs there were too many different codes - on stocks with many MMs there were not enough codes - this was borne out by the discussion excerpted above. |
Posted at 23/9/2002 16:22 by marquis zzaxx99 - 23 Sep'02 - 13:09 - 5 of 8May I add thanks to your time and effort. I copy the page you suggested; "With effect from Thursday 7 February 2002, Robert W Baird Limited ("Robert W Baird" or "the firm") will trade some of its agency and principal business through the following new additional set of trading codes: Firm Code: 302 CREST Code: 601 SEAQ Code: GRAN BIC Code: GRABGB21 Robert W Baird will continue to act in a principal and agency capacity and as a market maker in UK equities. The firm continues to have access to the SETS order book, the International Order Book and is a registered participant in the International Retail Service with the ability to enter orders. The firm has a Model A settlement agreement with Pershing Limited and for its agency business, a Model B settlement agreement with Pershing Securities Limited. Details are as follows with changes in bold: Robert W Baird Limited Mint House 77 Mansell Street London E1 8HF Telephone: 020 7488 1212 (General) Facsimile: 020 7481 3911 Additional Model B - agency/principal-SET Firm Code: 302 CREST Code: 601 SEAQ Code: GRAN BIC Code: GRABGB21 Model B - agency/principal-SET Firm Code: 302 CREST Code: 601 SEAQ Code: GRAV BIC Code: GRDAGB21 Model A - principal-Market Making Firm Code: 322 CREST Code: 322 SEAQ Code: GRAB BIC Code: GRBLGB21" Do these codes(Firm, Crest, Seaq and BIC) not translate to identifying which stock broker is trading in the transaction code list? From your comments you suggest not. In answer to my original question; "Transaction codes on Stocks: Is there a Transaction Code Directory anywhere?" I take it that you are suggesting there is not. |
Posted at 23/9/2002 12:09 by zzaxx99 If you have access to the PBB, have a look at - which goes into this in extensive depth. If you don't have access, here are some relevant highlights:Here's some info - well lots actually, on individual Marker Makers and their codes, Crest, Firm Code, SEAQ, BIC Code. Doesn't seem to be a connection with any of those codes and the individual trade codes. In fact the trade code only needs to be a unique code that can be cross-referenced with another set of records containing all the necessary information - no need for it to be embedded....as everyone has said sadly the year number at the end is actually the most useful piece of information.The first digit or letter identifies a sequence of numbers. There appear to be 16 sequences from which numbers are allocated (perhaps there are 16 servers receiving trades from the market). The digits after the first digit (apart from the last two which are the year) form the sequence number, again using both letters and digits. If you take all the trades with codes beginning with a given digit or letter, you will see that the sequence number increments with each successive trade, taken across the whole market chronologically. Not very useful.There are often batches of trades in which the variable elements are minimal; only one character differing in each ten-character set.Eg: Go the top page of today's trades (25 June) in BT.A and look at AT trades numbered 2069-2072 timed at 16:27:30.The first character is from the usual 16; the letters A-F and numbers 0-9 (randomly selected server? but in this case not changing). And the last two as usual are the year 02.Only the last of the middle seven characters differs..Thus:2072.. |
Posted at 15/8/2002 17:17 by marquis Transaction codes on Stocks: Is there a Transaction Code Directory anywhere?The reason I ask this question? I viewed the transactions today (15th Aug 2002) for Avon Rubber. There were 16 trades(including a zero trade) as you will see; 15 2027TYHP02 164.0 2000 O 161.0 164.0 14:14:00 2,000 35,805 16,500 14 000MRFF602 164.0 3000 O 161.0 164.0 13:47:00 3,000 33,805 16,500 13 1022CXHM02 161.0 500 O 161.0 164.0 13:31:00 500 30,805 16,500 12 1022CYX402 164.0 7800 O 161.0 164.0 13:14:07 7,800 30,805 16,000 11 2027U5CU02 161.0 6000 O 161.0 164.0 11:40:00 6,000 23,005 16,000 10 000MRHMU02 161.75 5000 O 161.0 164.0 11:25:43 5,000 23,005 10,000 9 1022CZKS02 162.0 5000 O 161.0 165.0 11:04:37 5,000 23,005 5,000 8 3029A7F402 165.0 2000 O 163.0 165.0 10:12:25 2,000 23,005 7 3029A46502 164.8 1455 O 163.0 165.0 9:54:00 1,455 21,005 6 000MRG0Y02 166.5 2376 O 163.0 167.0 8:14:00 2,376 19,550 5 2027U30Z02 165.0 5000 O 160.0 165.0 8:10:00 5,000 17,174 4 1022D02602 155.0 5000 M 153.0 155.0 8:05:48 5,000 12,174 3 1022CP0T02 154.65 5000 O 153.0 155.0 8:04:00 5,000 7,174 2 2027TY0R02 155.0 900 O 153.0 155.0 8:03:00 900 2,174 1 2027U70H02 154.65 960 O 153.0 155.0 8:01:00 960 1,274 0 1022CQ0V02 155.0 314 O 153.0 155.0 8:00:00 314 314 Observation reveals a big hike in purchase price from trade 4 (155) to trade 5 (165). Then I notice trades 0, 3, 4 all start with the transaction code 1022. Is that the same stockbroker? Transaction code 1022 also for trades 9, 12, 13. If 1022 relates to a certain broker, could the market makers know that he has good knowledge of the market and so upgrade the shares. Is this something 'we' as smaller players should be aware of? Comments please. |
Posted at 25/6/2002 20:40 by haystack Here are a nice set of trade codes in sequence for TSCO today going up in odd twos.A01VAFHF02 A01VAFHD02 A01VAFHB02 A01VAFH902 A01VAFH702 A01VAFH502 and another 4011EYU502 4011EYU302 4011EYU102 4011EYTZ02 showing Z going to 1 and the T clocking up to U This looks pretty much like a sequence number and not a code. If you were thinking of designing a system to uniquely identify trades then I think you would come to the conclusion that the sequences should have no meaning of their own. They should only have a meaning when looked up on the LSE server. I can't believe that the designers of the computer system would have embeded anything in the code itself. There is no need to do this. If the number is mearly a look up reference then it makes the system more flexible. The data items being looked up via the sequence number can then be as rich in meaning as is needed and can me modified and added to later with the minimum of alteration. I think this is a dead end. How the different sequences are chosen is more of a problem. It may be that it changes after a certain number of trades on the LSE or it may be pseudo random. |
Posted at 15/4/2002 20:48 by trumpet Here's some info - well lots actually, on individual Marker Makers and their codes, Crest, Firm Code, SEAQ, BIC Code. Doesn't seem to be a connection with any of those codes and the individual trade codes. In fact the trade code only needs to be a unique code that can be cross-referenced with another set of records containing all the necessary information - no need for it to be embedded. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
