Neteller Share Discussion Threads

[maestro4] 23/8/2007 11:07

is that all target price of 102p..

[sabre1_98] 23/8/2007 11:06

where would the case be heard?

[dealy] 23/8/2007 11:02

There are thousands of listed companies in America that face law suits of varying natures every day. The difference is though that US investors don't knock 20% off the value of a company every time they see the words "potential litigation".

It's not a drug company that caused thousands of patients to die.

[maestro4] 23/8/2007 10:59

only in america!!

they'll probably sue you for walking on the wrong side of the street.

[dealy] 23/8/2007 10:56

on what basis? They were ordered by the US authorities to stop doing business.

[dealy] 23/8/2007 10:47

sabre,

LOL

[sabre1_98] 23/8/2007 10:46

so the vendor would in essence be admitting money laundering to bring the case against NLR? I hope they bring their toothbrush if its in the states, lol

[dealy] 23/8/2007 10:43

sipp,

that's sounds plausible. A gaming company mouthing off trying to blame NLR. That's a claim that will end up in the trash can.

[maestro4] 23/8/2007 10:41

"...No claim has been filed and the outcome and potential damages are unknown"

with whats happened in the last 8 months, nlr need to clear this asap. If this vendor is successful other might take the same action.

[sipp_2005] 23/8/2007 10:39

A vendor, not a customer

If I were a gaming company and had a contract with NLR and NLR decided to stop supplying me I might have a case if the action took place before an instruction to stop from a competent authority. After that instruction I guess they would claim force majeur

[dealy] 23/8/2007 10:39

what would a likely "vendor" be in this case? Hardly a gambler right?

[sabre1_98] 23/8/2007 10:39

wow over reaction or what, back in at this price

[quinan] 23/8/2007 10:34

dealy he/she is probably very peed off and we know what the yanks are like when they get peed off. BUT what happens if it went to court, the person involved was breaking the Law in gambling online?? Bet they haven't thought of that?

[dealy] 23/8/2007 10:30

Is this statement really so bad:

"The Group is aware of potential litigation resulting from an alleged breach of
contract with a vendor. No claim has been filed and the outcome and potential
damages are unknown"

We are talking about "a", namely one vendor. He has not yet filed a claim.

[no fear no greed] 23/8/2007 10:30

Here we go again with Tommy25

Shouting from the rooftop. Are we?

Every board has one of it's kind. We have Tommy25 on this board

Regards: NFNG

[maestro4] 23/8/2007 10:30

tommy25

you are a embarrasment!!!

rofl

[dan1man] 23/8/2007 10:26

great insight tommy, thanks

[tommy25] 23/8/2007 10:24

this co should be 10p, once they pay out their settlement, will be left with nothing, no point in investing in this co at this price - sel sell selll

[dan1man] 23/8/2007 10:23

wow, whats happening to the sp

great buying op assuming this litigation isn't anything significant

or it could just be the usual pump and dump we usually see on and before results day

[maestro4] 23/8/2007 10:22

9:30, they are in there having their coffees.

[dealy] 23/8/2007 10:19

what time is the analyst meeting?

They need to clarify this litigation issue else we're back at 60p today.