Neometals Share Discussion Threads

[pc4900074200] 10/5/2006 17:59

Email sent.

pc

[wild bill] 10/5/2006 16:32

pc - send me the number I need

[wild bill] 10/5/2006 16:31

what's a sliper?

[pachandl] 09/5/2006 13:56

Quite right WB

[wild bill] 09/5/2006 13:23

"quite as a church mouse"

quiet too

[jurgen klinnsman] 09/5/2006 12:59

quite as a church mouse with carpet slipers........ in here.

[wild bill] 09/5/2006 09:59

Must have been that big sell this morning that sent this down!

[hugepants] 03/5/2006 12:25

Dont feel sorry for NMT. The company has been a disgrace frankly. How many millions have been squandered on developing something with no commercial value?

[srsm] 02/5/2006 12:13

'Real' NMT management asked VLE for their plan for the business. VLE refused (and then accused NMT of hiding information). At the time we all thought it was due to them simply taking the cash for some other investment and closing the business as was. Turns out they had no plan (except to close syringe business).

And if you accused them of just a little hypocracy they would be offended.


I wonder if Graham Crowther is permitted to divulge what actually happened with LOI deal (VLE might even be telling the truth!).

[pc4900074200] 02/5/2006 11:59

Having read the yearly results, taking in what little
we have been told about our future. One thought
comes to mind.

The future does not look too bright.

We now have 5 months until the AGM with little
or no prospects of any more news.

Since the boardroom take-over there has been
684 sell trades. Which given the amounts sold,
look to be individual shareholders selling and
moving on.

With the board giving themselves another five
months before they have to announce anything
more. This looks to be just another way to reduce
the shareholder head-count over that time.

With the cry of "Shareholder Value" from the EGM still ringing in my head.
I wonder what will become of NMT?

Yes we have been given more information as to
what went on regarding the LOI, but are we to
believe that this management went back to the
negotiating table with the same commitment that
the previous team had.

Or that they just went through the motions knowing
that their agenda was to shut down any further
talks.

Like wise with the talks with ZIM.

If they had any strategy lined-up for where they were
going to take NMT if they won the boardroom battle.
This use of delaying the AGM until September clearly
shows that there is no direction ATM and that they are
clearly playing for time, all the while, still draining
NMT's resources, but with a fresh set of faces and
to the cost of remaining shareholders.

I for one, will still be here but how many others will
have gone?

September will be one year on from the take-over
and all we will see is that there are another set
of heads in the trough, feeding from NMT's resources.

Doing the same as what they told us others were doing.

"Shareholder Value"
Will be a word that I feel Volvere will regret they used.
As a company, Volvere are making money, but it is in
wages to Directors and staff, not to their shareholders.
As can be seen by the way that Volvere has "flat-lined"
for many months. NMT looks to be heading in the
same direction.

Money for some but none for shareholders.

As I have said?

The future does not look good!!!

pc

[waldron] 25/4/2006 15:58

trust you are well wb

same goes for pc.

[wild bill] 25/4/2006 15:52

Good Afternoon Frenchie

[pc4900074200] 21/4/2006 08:04

The clock is ticking?

Anniversary of final results 26th April 2006.

Notice of Final Results overdue?

Not long now till Volvere will have to
speak to remaining shareholders.

They can delay for a short time, but
results are results and have to be posted.

So they will have to declare where we
are and we will have the AGM date to
look forward to.

pc

[jurgen klinnsman] 20/4/2006 14:15

very quiet............................

[wild bill] 20/4/2006 13:38

lonely too

[wild bill] 17/4/2006 11:09

dark in here

[wild bill] 16/4/2006 14:58

cold in here

[Abuse team] 14/4/2006 20:46

Post removed by ADVFN

[Abuse team] 14/4/2006 20:37

Post removed by ADVFN

[wild bill] 11/4/2006 15:37

quiet in here

[Abuse team] 04/4/2006 04:54

Post removed by ADVFN

[pc4900074200] 31/3/2006 11:27

I am still amazed that people sell off these small amounts of
Shares. Each day we see little amounts trickling out.
With broker fees as they are, there is little return after the
sale. Also, to reinvest, another chunk is taken in fees.

IMO the rules governing shares should be changed in
situations like these, where board take-overs the like of
which has gone on with NMT.

[ Director / large shareholder take-over. With a block-aid
on information, after the take-over. Then, self-imposed
payments made to themselves without agreement from
all remaining shareholders].

Directors know that if they can hold back from releasing
information they can clear many PI's from the books.
It's the same with a consolidation, which was why I was
opposed to that, when NMT went down that road.

If a company suffers a Director take-over it should be
mandatory that a clear, concise, future strategy is placed
on the table to all shareholders at the time of the take-over.
New Directors should no be allowed to be able to control
with a free licence. By the time there is an AGM, the damage
has been done and with careful wording of the agenda and
the use of creste and nominee restrictions on voting rights of
shareholders. More damage can be achieved.

Having held shares for many years I have seen other investors
and lost investments my-self, due to this loophole.

I see that the FSA are tightening the rules regarding cash-shell
Companies. This comes into being from today. I just wish
that they would consider the rules regarding creste / nominee
accounts and make it compulsory that all shareholders are named
on shareholder lists and that regarding AGM's and EGM's. The
company concerned HAS to send the voting card to all shareholders.
There-by, removing the need to have to waist time and money,
not only by shareholders but also registrars / brokers in getting
the vote to the shareholder if they know of the pending vote
requirement and want take the time to vote.

Time and time again the restrictions of creste / nominee have
altered the outcome of AGM's and EGM's. NMT is a classic case.
The turnout of votes was abysmal and with the holding that
Volvere held, they knew that control was theirs before the meeting.

If the rules had been different, we could be sitting with a share
on a steady increase with the second-generation syringe making headway
in the market place.

We will never learn what went on regarding the LOI. It should have
been made clear to shareholders at the time of the termination of the
discussions, what happen and why they were discontinued.

With discussions closed there should have been no need for secrecy
regarding who was the other companies in discussions and all should
have been revealed.

Who closed the book on Who, or when discussions went on, was it
conducted with willing and genuine parties?

Will that be outlined at the AGM?

I think not!!! We will be told that it is in the past and that will be that.

Sorry, just my bi-monthly moan, but I felt the need to express myself
and let out some frustration.

pc