We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nature Tech | LSE:NSO | London | Ordinary Share | JE00B3B5FZ40 | ORD 0.2P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 9.125 | - | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
19/8/2008 08:59 | What can you sell them at no5 ??divide by 20 not much of a move up ?? | h d shoring | |
18/8/2008 18:13 | No 5 ---idiot you accused me of talking this share down in post1652, remember? | h d shoring | |
18/8/2008 16:58 | Well us holders seem happy enuff-just u profit takers doing all the whinging :) Wasn't aware u had managed to talk this share down. Thought last movement was up? Kept the language simple 4u-wouldn't like u to skulk away again feinging incomprehension :) | jcpete5 | |
18/8/2008 15:20 | The pr for nso is really poor . They announce a MAJOR contract ,give no value to it and not a lot of detail. Is it one plant container size ,or a plant to serve a complex ?. Dont have to talk this share down the lack of effort from the company does it. I have always thought that this will eventually become a money spinner but how long will it take.? | h d shoring | |
10/8/2008 05:31 | It's q and h-the deramp double act. Lost their summer booking at the weston-super-mare pavilion, sold their stake in NSO and now desperate to talk it down. U guys should sell tickets-ure actually quite good,keeping us all entertained with ure antics :) | jcpete5 | |
09/8/2008 21:36 | zzzzzzzwasatt? har har as if? Kazahkstan hey? Welcome to my yurt stranger, a glass of fermented mares milk? Sleep over there and wait for the oil to well zzzzzzzzz Q. | quidnunc | |
07/8/2008 14:13 | Q that 9 sell ?? is it you sneakily dumping your holding ? | h d shoring | |
06/8/2008 12:53 | the NSO market is the definition of rationality | velvetide | |
06/8/2008 11:38 | as ever cant keep a civil tongue in your head no 5 . | h d shoring | |
06/8/2008 09:59 | U pair are a scream-keep up the entertainment :) | jcpete5 | |
05/8/2008 21:28 | I'm sorry guys, this deal was flagged about the time of the AGM. It doesn't go in the price twice Q. | quidnunc | |
05/8/2008 11:38 | Strange they did not put a value on this major contract. 1 unit deployed in North sea one to be deployed Caspian ,if it is similar size will not really be major money .? No buys since announcement and share price has to reach around 16p to achieve a high . Move in the right direction but still a long way to go . | h d shoring | |
04/8/2008 20:24 | What is the name of this 'major' company? Is it Haliburton? I am surprised that the share price hasn't gone up like a rocket? | 2magpies | |
04/8/2008 14:31 | Plummeting into oblivion eh q :) | jcpete5 | |
04/8/2008 14:31 | Read carefully, two significant bits of new and good news | velvetide | |
04/8/2008 14:30 | Nature Technology Solutions Limited ("NTS" or "the Company") Major new order Nature Technology Solutions Ltd , the AIM listed environmental group providing waste treatment services to the ports and oil industries, announces that it has received a confirmed order for a containerised oily slops treatment system to be delivered to a major oilfield service company in Kazakhstan within 2008. This unit is to be commissioned for operation on a man-made island in the Caspian Sea where environmental requirements now require treatment of polluted wastewaters generated during drilling operations. This order, together with the continuing successful operation of the Group's rig based Offshore Treatment Unit ("OTU") on a large drilling rig offshore Norway (where polluted water generated on the rig is being treated to significantly under 10 particles per million (ppm) of hydrocarbon pollution, compared with the recent standards of 50 ppm set for many years as a North Sea target) demonstrates the progress being made towards both the zero pollution target now required in Norway and reduced pollution from drilling generated wastewaters worldwide. Enquiries: Nature Technology Solutions Limited Richard Eldridge, CEO Tel: 01841 533 611 Nigel Sandy, Director Tel: 01373 473995 Seymour Pierce Limited Jonathan Wright, Director Tel: 020 7107 8000 This information is provided by RNS The company news service from the London Stock Exchange END CNTUUUUPRUPRGCC | velvetide | |
01/8/2008 13:57 | Yes, yet another white knuckle ride as the MM's try their hardest to stimulate interest in their client's shares, simply breathtaking | velvetide | |
01/8/2008 12:01 | aaahhhhhhhhh i see business as usual then zzzzzzzzzzzzz | fatfish | |
23/7/2008 06:55 | Well the temptation must overwhelm the MM's soon. If there's news and no interest in buying at this level, they'll start marking it down now that the company has conveniently raised both the floor and the potential commission for them. Q. | quidnunc | |
17/7/2008 14:48 | Sorry Jcpete5 I must bow out because my O level English does not enable me to understand your point .I thought I had answered the question but obviously you think not . | h d shoring | |
17/7/2008 13:58 | Both u and H make statements which to be honest are bordering on de-ramping. U offer nothing to back these statements/opinions. U both avoid specific questions-ure latest explaination of which.... random ad hominem jibes aren't really enough to rouse me or the share from our slumbers. In case u missed the question ... ''any explaination why hasn't spiraled down the pan-having been there many times. Please include in your answer why global crunch/share consolidation has not accelerated it's historical demise'' Ure previous answer would relate to a share in stagnation-while ure overall stand is one of a bomb out. | jcpete5 | |
17/7/2008 13:21 | jc, If you'd posted something worth arguing about or replying to then it would have elicited a better response but random ad hominem jibes aren't really enough to rouse me or the share from our slumbers. Q. | quidnunc | |
17/7/2008 13:17 | H-demonstrating the weakness of your arguments does not imply that u are in an argument. I will accept though, that u have no explaination and have nothing except historical data to back ure opinion. Q-see u have used ure strongest argument once again-repetition of a single letter :) | jcpete5 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions