We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mulberry Group Plc | LSE:MUL | London | Ordinary Share | GB0006094303 | ORD 5P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -12.50 | -11.11% | 100.00 | 17,272 | 14:50:13 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95.00 | 105.00 | 112.50 | 100.00 | 112.50 | |
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apparel & Accessories, Nec | 152.84M | -33.51M | -0.5577 | -1.79 | 67.59M |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16:01:21 | O | 1 | 105.00 | GBX |
| Date | Time | Source | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20/6/2025 | 14:29 | ALNC |  Mulberry says taken steps to cut costs; revenue to be down, loss flat |
| 20/6/2025 | 13:30 | UK RNS | Mulberry Group PLC Proposed £20 million fundraising & Trading Update |
| 30/1/2025 | 16:23 | ALNC | "Back to the Mulberry spirit" for handbag maker after sales decline |
| 30/1/2025 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Mulberry Group PLC Strategy Update, CFO Appointment & Trading Update |
| 21/1/2025 | 12:19 | ALNC | EXECUTIVE CHANGES: Mulberry finance chief exits; new Portmeirion chair |
| 20/1/2025 | 09:00 | UK RNS | Mulberry Group PLC Board Change |
| 19/11/2024 | 18:01 | UK RNS | Mulberry Group PLC Result of AGM |
| 19/11/2024 | 12:29 | ALNC | Mulberry sees shares slide as its half-year loss widens |
| 19/11/2024 | 07:00 | UK RNS | Mulberry Group PLC Half Year Results |
| 15/11/2024 | 12:00 | UK RNS | Mulberry Group PLC Notice of Results |
Mulberry (MUL) Share Charts1 Year Mulberry Chart |
|
1 Month Mulberry Chart |
Intraday Mulberry Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20/6/2025 | 23:15 | Who would want Mullberry? | 556 |
| 18/10/2024 | 14:05 | *** Mulberry *** | 79 |
| 02/3/2019 | 22:48 | mulberry | 405 |
| 21/6/2014 | 11:36 | Mulberry onwards and upwards! | 1 |
| 08/9/2007 | 16:31 | Mulberry - Short the berries off it - FD resigns and sells shares | 22 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15:01:21 | 105.00 | 1 | 1.05 | O |
| 15:01:21 | 95.00 | 1 | 0.95 | O |
| 15:00:02 | 95.60 | 2,000 | 1,912.00 | O |
| 14:28:11 | 95.50 | 262 | 250.21 | O |
| 14:14:13 | 100.84 | 8,500 | 8,571.57 | O |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 20/6/2025 09:20 by Mulberry Daily Update Mulberry Group Plc is listed in the Apparel & Accessories, Nec sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker MUL. The last closing price for Mulberry was 112.50p.Mulberry currently has 60,077,458 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Mulberry is £60,077,458. Mulberry has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -1.79. This morning MUL shares opened at 112.50p |
Posted at 20/6/2025 17:43 by clocktower They should have left Mike Ashley take it over when they raised last time.Still going down the drain with a huge drop in revenue - a drop of over £30 million. This should be less than 50p a share, MA has a turkey on his hands again. He will need a Flannel to wipe his tears. |
Posted at 17/4/2025 15:43 by clocktower Due for a full year update in the next week or so before results normally released in June.I am only expected more bad news from MUL but will Mike try stepping in again? |
Posted at 19/11/2024 11:55 by martinmc123 2*Mulberry posted a pretty woeful set of FY numbers this morning, ones which prompted new CEO Andrea Baldo to note ” "Though I've only been in the role of CEO for under three months, the first half results illustrate the clear need to reprioritise and rebuild the business.” Performance was bad. Group revenue was down 19% to £56.1m with UK retail sales down 14% to £31.3m... ...from WealthOracle wealthoracle.co.uk/d |
Posted at 23/10/2024 10:37 by clocktower The majority owners have the whip hand until such time as it can be proved that they are abusing minority holders.By not advising MA of the intended raise at £1 or discussing it with someone that owned 36% of the business was the first thing that supports the allegation of acting against minority holders interests. I believe no matter what (bar a legal case) they have no intention of selling to MA at any sensible price. I guess they have made other plans and those may not have included any current minor holders. Does the major holder sit as a shadow on the board or at the meetings? I have seen this occur before elsewhere, and the board responded that they do take take part, just. listen. Then the regulators would do nothing about it, even when it was put into receivership - but the company was then sold to a director. |
Posted at 22/10/2024 11:31 by 1gw Largest shareholder happy to raise new equity at £1. Second-largest indicatively offering £1.50 to purchase the company. Board stuck because it thinks it knows the largest shareholder (which clearly has a blocking vote in takeover terms) won't accept £1.50 and so the offer isn't "tenable".Isn't the obvious answer for the board to insist on a formal sale process to see what the company might be worth to a genuine third party? The problem would be how to prevent this simply being seen as a stalking horse process to work out how much one of the 2 interested shareholders would have to pay to buy the other out. Ideally you'd have both major shareholders agree in principle to sell to the highest bidder if a price can be agreed above a certain level, with the sale process run as close to arms length as can be managed reporting to an independent director - but is there anything in applicable regulations that can facilitate this sort of outcome? |
Posted at 16/10/2024 09:24 by aishah From Citywire yesterday.Handbags at Mulberry’s future over Frasers’ bid, says Hargreaves The latest bid by Frasers (FRAS) for luxury handbag group Mulberry (MUL) has been rejected but Hargreaves Lansdown says there are hopes for a higher offer. AIM-listed Mulberry turned down Fraser’s latest 150p per share offer as Challice, its largest 56% shareholder, refused to sell. ‘Words of frustration have been pumped out from both sides,’ said analyst Susannah Streeter. ‘Frasers Group has clearly lost so much faith in the current direction of the company that it’s fearful of collapse and has warned it does not want to see another Debenhams-style scenario play out. ‘But Challice is also clearly exasperated by the relentless focus, wanting to give the new chief executive Andrea Baldo a chance to bed in and help revive the brand’s fortune.’ An excited market pushed Mulberry shares up 11.5%, or 13p, at 125.5p today, although they are still down 24% this year. |
Posted at 01/10/2024 09:46 by clocktower It needs to be under the umbrella of one of the major luxury goods brands, that has the firepower to supercharge the brand.When you consider the shareprice this was trading at years ago, from around 50p in 2004 to around £23/24.00 nine or ten years later, only to sink into huge debts and a current share price of £1.15/1.30. It is not just the market, it is bad management and poor decision making. However MA would make a good interim owner, as the majority stakeholder holds everyone over a barrel. |
Posted at 30/9/2024 06:59 by clocktower No hidden agenda, just stating facts and the situation as I perceive it to be.Remember I have been here from the days the share was trading at 50p right up to the highs, while not being invested all the time, fortunately. However, I have kept abreast of it and the market it serves. While the company is a prestigious brand it is not a truly prestigious international leader, and competition is fierce in the sector. They misjudged the niche they serve and invested at the wrong times recently. Time will tell. |
Posted at 07/2/2024 18:55 by jbfnfn Had to edit this post as I missed some options granted in July 2023.OPTIONS GRANTED UNDER THE 2008 UNAPPROVED SHARE OPTION SCHEME Thierry Andretta 230,415 (Exercise price 8.680 Pounds) Thierry Andretta 70,000 (Exercise price 10.342 Pounds) Thierry Andretta 350,000 (Exercise price 2.705 Pounds) Thierry Andretta 350,000 (Exercise price 2.49 Pounds) Granted July 2023 So that's 1,000,415 options. Thierry Andretta was also granted 250,000 options on the performance share plan but these have now lapsed because the performance conditions were not met. The exercise prices were just the share price when the options were granted. It's a reminder of how far the share price has fallen in the last 10 years and even the last 6 months. So Thierry Andretta currently has 1,000,415 options which are worth nothing as the share price at 1.4 Pounds is a long way below the exercise price of any of the options. Thierry Andretta will have to struggle on with his 1M plus package of basic salary, taxable benefits and pension contributions. What seems to happen is they grant options, the share price falls further so they have to grant more options at the lower price. I could have made a mistake as I only have a comprehensive school education. |
Posted at 23/11/2023 16:55 by jbfnfn The Ong's still want Mulberry.Ong Beng Seng and Christina Ong have control of the business with 56% of the shares. Melissa Ong is a director. Ashley has about 37% of the shares but I'm not sure that's bought him any influence at all. That leaves about 7% of the shares as a free float that's only 6 or 7 million pounds at the current share price. Ashley probably has a higher net worth than the Ong's, but both parties are billionaires. The Ong's are old money based in Singapore, see the film "Crazy Rich Asians". Except for a lot of money I'm not sure Ashley has anything in common with the Ong's. I would be very surprised if they moved in the same social circles. The Ong's may not care what the share price is. I have a very small holding here I'm a penny punter. Is the current business strategy the correct one? If they reduced costs could a decently profitable business emerge or would that devalue the brand. How can they compete with LVMH? Do they need to? |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
