Mosman Oil And Gas Share Discussion Threads

[244dk] 28/1/2021 09:40

You could just as easily ask why people invested at 1p. They're sitting on a loss (paper or otherwise) of over 80%.
Not that it matters but I personally think the directors are very well remunerated in salary, consulting fees etc for their achievements to date.

[ford fairlane] 28/1/2021 09:15

Disclaimers are used the world over to minimise people suing.

I this case I guess the researcher, the company, mosman, or Directors.

Personally I a shocked that Directors actually do the job, (given the threats, and potential legal cases that may happen) for the small amount of money they get paid. I certainly would not do it for less than twice their income.

I believe in Mosman, and the Board. I don't believe everything they do is smart, but they are not ripping shareholders off and brought the company out of a very difficult 2020 in good shape.

Yes I understand people invested at over 30p. Personally I find that most strange given the assets at the time, but as I say, each to their own,

gotta go, more drinks here

[244dk] 28/1/2021 08:40

With all of the disclaimers in place the point would be? I'll just keep my fingers crossed that some of it becomes factual.

[ford fairlane] 28/1/2021 08:39

Same that you are not on holiday in Asia, it is very quiet and peace full at the moment.

Texas is much busier normally.

anyhow G and T time for me

[ford fairlane] 28/1/2021 08:35

so there is nothing stopping you calling the researcher then.

[244dk] 28/1/2021 08:24

I'm definitely not on holiday in Asia nor do I live in Texas. Outer isles of Ireland? I also read all of the disclaimers within the report regarding its content and projections. No actual timeframe for any drill although the earliest date mentioned was Q2. Wait and see, each to his own.

[talais] 28/1/2021 08:22

Sorry Ford fairlane. That was directed at 244

[ssrmb] 28/1/2021 08:18

I am positive on Mosman but to be fair to 244dk I noticed the same thing but just thought it was an error. By their own definition it should be a strong buy, massively positive that the valuation doesn’t include Aus assets. Oil price holding up well, looks like supply will continue to be restricted by the majors, be great to get an update on current output and revenue including improvements at Falcon. Don’t get the fuss about Falcon, people accusing the company of lying, they published the output that they were achieving which was reality, just didn’t say why and may well not have known at the time the technical reasons for the issue.

[talais] 28/1/2021 08:08

Your invested????

[ford fairlane] 28/1/2021 08:08

I think that is BS.

You are just looking for mistakes so they can be publicised and criticised.

Here is an idea for you, be positive for 2021.

in you want information call the person who wrote the report, its not that hard surely or are you on the outer isles of Ireland?

[244dk] 28/1/2021 07:54

I thought I might get an informed opinion from fellow investors, obviously not.

[ford fairlane] 28/1/2021 07:38

Why don't you call him and ask, rather than post it here.

[244dk] 28/1/2021 06:48

Based on a target price of 0.42p per share why was the recommendation only a buy and not a strong buy?
Strong buy = over 100% expected return (over 12 months)
Buy = over 15% expected return (over 12 months)
(In the small print at the end of the report that nobody ever reads)

The indications seem to suggest it will take longer than 12 months to achieve the target price?

[ford fairlane] 27/1/2021 23:24

So the Bully with no shares and no objectivity and no oil and gas understanding does not believe the SPA report.

I put that down as a big bonus.

I did note the bit about the OZ assets.

that is why the are NOT Included in the valuation I guess.

BUT they did make some very bold predictions on the OZ assets.

each to their own.

[bulgarian] 27/1/2021 18:38

Broker note suggests a mahoosive 0.42p target, if all the projected Texan plays align?

Cor.

One thing I did pick up on - the OZ assets are STILL very early days after all these years?

Really?

;-)

[spary1] 27/1/2021 16:37

Hey up, when desperate to troll refer to a TW piece, hilarious, That really is gutter press💩ԁ69;

[stockhunters] 27/1/2021 14:01

bulgarian i do not subscribe but i would like to know what was said

[talais] 27/1/2021 13:59

They been resolved Looks like we will have a higher flow rate soon.The Falcon-1 well (MSMN 50% WI) at the Champion project commenced commercial production in December 2020 and is currently producing c.180boepd (gross). Mosman's net production is therefore 90boepd which falls to 68boepd after royalties. With regards to gas output, the well is currently producing at an intended lower flow rate of 1000mmbtu/d. This is primarily because the pressure has to be reduced from the wellhead 1900 psi to pipeline 1500 psi, and the related temperature drop is causing hydrates and icing in the connection pipeline. The partners have since installed methanol injection which appears to have resolved the issue

[bulgarian] 27/1/2021 13:58

Anyone read the TW / Shareprophets article posted this morning, able to give a summary on what was written?

[ford fairlane] 27/1/2021 12:34

what Falcon problems are you talking about?

[spary1] 27/1/2021 12:03

Wow the only person worried is the non shareholder Stockhunter.

So has the share price got away from you or is your short hurting ?

Either way you look very desperate !!

Who spends all there days trolling a share they don’t own, very sad 😢

[ford fairlane] 27/1/2021 11:47

why dont you ask them

[stockhunters] 27/1/2021 10:14

broker promoting only means one thing to me

[ford fairlane] 27/1/2021 09:52

please continue to ignore the current situation and the very detailed planned future.