Molten Ventures Share Discussion Threads

[tara7] 25/2/2013 08:41

NTOG

Not into oil and gas, but the statement is very good news for shareholders.
Pleased for investors, and a good start for this one of your five stocks.!

[professor pettigrew] 25/2/2013 08:31

NTOG

I refer holders to the RNS issued by the company this morning regarding increased production and break-even, ahead of schedule.

[norbert colon] 22/2/2013 05:13

Thanks Tara

[tara7] 21/2/2013 16:23

Go to 2013 then tap "positions" found at bottom of the page.




Norbert Colon
21 Feb'13 - 16:13 - 42 of 44 0 0


Tara

On the stockchallenge website how do you see / access the stock selections of each investor?

[sportsauto] 21/2/2013 16:20

Watch GWMO on the move...massive potential �2m mcap 64 million shares tightly held
one GWMO Nevada properties assets worth upto $15 billion ....they have SEVEN proprties in Nevada ..

-------"Target 4"

-------"Independent exploration targets, compiled in accordance with the JORC Code established;"

-------"oxides up to 48.5 million tonnes at 0.3% to 0.5% Cu"

-------"sulphides up to 195 million tonnes at 0.3% to 0.8% Cu"

So that's 145,000 to 242,500 tonnes of copper yeah?
and then 585,000 to 1,560,000 tonnes of copper ok?
add 'em up 730,000 to 1,802,500 tonnes of copper?
$8215 per tonne = $5,996,950,000 to $14,807,537,500?
Is that really $6b to $15b at the upper target?


The target models are now believed to consist of the following possibilities:

Table No. 1: Potential Target Models
Model Mass, Tonnes Grade

Disseminated Silver 25 Million 102.9g/t Ag
Disseminated Oxide Copper 25 Million 0.6% Cu
Epithermal Silver Vein 3 Million 514.3g//t Ag

[norbert colon] 21/2/2013 16:13

Tara

On the stockchallenge website how do you see / access the stock selections of each investor?

Thanks!

[norbert colon] 21/2/2013 16:13

Tara

On the stockchallenge website how do you see / access the stock selections of each investor?

Thanks!

[oscar romano] 19/2/2013 22:17

Davesta

Interesting detailed post and congrats for finally coming out of the woodwork and posting – welcome – a member since 2010 and your first post - fascinating. Can you expand on your spread bet pls for clarification – the period for example – are you specifying the duration of the positions you are opening for EZJ? Thx

Oscar R

great stuff – hope this is the start of many a post from you lol

[oscar romano] 19/2/2013 21:18

Good stuff professor.....thx

I'm a little lost - just for clarification, you never read Tara's thread of his free analysis that he very kindly posted on his PTO thread?

Cheers.

Oscar R

one for C.I. to look into methinks

[tara7] 19/2/2013 21:14

PTO:

Both of these companies are running on our software.

Penguin and Random House may merge, but the power lies elsewhere

Talks over a Penguin-Random House consolidation are driven by the big tech giants – and more publishers are likely to follow

Philip Jones

guardian.co.uk, Friday 26 October 2012 17.49 BST

'Amazon controls 90% of the ebook market in the UK, and close to 40% of sales of all books.'

A merger of Random House and Penguin would create a £2.5bn trade publisher – by some distance the biggest ever seen. Authors such as E L James, Salman Rushdie, John le Carre, Pippa Middleton, and Jamie Oliver may become bedfellows. No wonder agents and authors are using words like "scary" and "sad" in reaction to the news.

But this is a consolidation driven not by authors, but by big tech giants, such as Amazon, and Apple, on whose platforms book publishers must now play.

Even at that size the "House of the Random Penguin" (as it must surely be known) would be a squib compared to those companies – 6% the size of Amazon, 8% of Google, and just 2% of Apple – but at least it might get a voice in the background, perhaps even a seat at the table.

There has been talk of consolidation at the top of consumer publishing for a number of years now. Some believe the over the next decade the so-called "big six" publishers – in addition to "Pengdom", the list includes Hachette, Macmillan, Simon & Schuster, and HarperCollins – will slowly be whittled down into the "top two".

But mega-mergers in trade publishing have been on hold since 2006, when Hachette bought Time Warner's consumer book publishing business. Since then the big houses have been dancing around each other without ever quite coming close enough to begin talking dowries. The surprise here is not the talks, but those doing the talking. This may be a marriage of convenience, but shotguns were not involved: Random House is already the biggest trade publisher in the US and in the UK, thanks to the huge success of Fifty Shades, it is also back in the top spot. Penguin is somewhat smaller in both markets, but its brand is huge. Both are backed by huge media groups, RH by the German giant Bertelsmann, and Penguin by Pearson, the owner of education publisher Pearson Education, and of course the Financial Times (which broke the news of these talks on Thursday).

The theory is surely that by putting Bertelsmann's corporate engine inside Penguin's Rolls Royce body, a vehicle can be manufactured that will race up the digital autobahns, while also appealing to consumers. Publishers are making a decent fist of "getting digital", but is the big tech groups that control the routes to the end user. Random House's Clockwork Orange app, and Penguin's forthcoming Diary of Anne Frank app, show businesses that are evolving how they use their content skills in this space, but it is Apple that will decide the release date of the apps, not the publishers. Similarly, Amazon controls 90% of the ebook market in the UK, and close to 40% of sales of all books. Fall foul of negotiations with the Seattle giant and buy buttons will be turned off. And if you are not selling ebooks through Amazon, then you are not selling ebooks at all. Publishers desperately need leverage, and they need money to build alternative platforms. Since the US Department of Justice – which earlier this year sued the big US publishers over colluding to bring in fixed ebook prices – has effectively ended collaboration, consolidation remains the only option.

The worry for authors, agents, and smaller bookshop chains such as Waterstones, is that Penguin House would have too great a market share of consumer book sales: with judicious pruning this share might be taken down below the 25% threshold meaning the Competition Commission could nod it through. But in reality, in literary and commercial fiction, their hold would be bigger, and fearsome. The duo account for six titles in this week's mass-market fiction top 10 alone.

But those fears look misplaced (at least in the wider context). Even within the larger publishers, such as Hachette, or Random House, individual imprints of the stature of Jonathan Cape, John Murray, and Michael Joseph would bid against each other. It is naive to imagine that the big groups don't set ceilings, but in truth advances are being driven down by fears over the future of high street bookshops and the shift to digital, not by consolidation at the top. The

publishing world is also kept honest by those smaller independent publishers, such as Profile Books, often run by individuals discarded by the big groups. A publishing deal is still a relationship between one editor, one agent, and one author. The essence of this won't change.

The Competition Commission could yet have a role to play, particularly if it chose to investigate the book market more widely, as many hoped it would do when Amazon bought The Book Depository in 2011. But it would need to get the details straight – in a way it lamentably failed to do when it nodded that acquisition through, despite a chorus of complaint from publishers and booksellers.

Make no mistake, this is a huge deal, long on implication for many in the publishing business, and a shape of things to come. But the giants in the book business are no longer the publishers, whatever their sleeping arrangements.

[pillion] 19/2/2013 16:52

Cheers tara7

[tara7] 19/2/2013 16:40

NTA /Inland.

Yes and no.

Inland is crying out for a bid C:40p plus.

Directors will in my view want out prior to rates going up,[after which the game is up.]

good luck.

[pillion] 19/2/2013 16:34

Hi tara
Do you see any similarity between and Northacre NTA ?

cheers pill

[tara7] 19/2/2013 12:19

PTO:


The UN deal hit the press in October 2011. Is this about to go live?







United Nations Digital


www.un.org/digital/


Welcome to the United Nations' collection of digital products. .... Launching early 2013, the UN eCollection is a research tool containing all current publications ...

[monkey puzzle] 15/2/2013 09:35

well that's another thread I shall be reading less now.....shame really but P&D posters are not my cup of tea

[michaelsadvfn] 15/2/2013 09:03

PTO

That's 75% margins on new sales...very nice.

[tara7] 15/2/2013 08:55

PTO:

More research:


It is a broker report from Old Mutual Securities 11 years ago.!!

At the time the company was Ingenta.

One needs to look at the gearing effect of extra software sales.

With turnover of £24.7M profit = £3.5m but look how much profit the broker puts down for the £45.8M of turnover.!!



SALES PROFIT

2002E £24.7M £3.5M

2003E £45.8M £15.9M

So for less than double the turnover profits were predicted to roar.!!


This is why in my view PTO will over the next few months and years do so very, very, well.

Turnover is on the rise[after being flat for 3 years] The research bill is also being slashed as the new software is finished.

[monkey puzzle] 14/2/2013 17:54

PTO

Enough of the ramping Tara, we all know how you work so cut it out. This is suppsed to be a discussion thread, not one for pumping your stock every day.

[chinese investor] 14/2/2013 10:38

harrissen,
Please include the EPIC Code at the Top next time.

[harrissen] 14/2/2013 09:52

Mark Knopfler
12 Feb'13 - 17:00 - 3 of 3 0 0


Prof


Are you related to Professor Plum ?

.............................



He would be more of a Prof. James Moriarty type I'm thinking!?

[harrissen] 14/2/2013 09:46

Professor Pettigrew
14 Feb'13 - 09:30 - 25 of 25 0 0


May I please remind any posters on here to include the EPIC code of the name of the stock they are referring to, please no "off-topic" comments and NO general comments such as "good thread".

I would like this to be an interesting discussion board only focussing on the 5 stocks mentioned in the header.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation

....................


What a pompous old windbag you are Prof!

Who the hell do you think you are coming on here as a newbie and straight away start laying down the law about what can and cannot be discussed on your ropey little thread.

Sod off I say ans stick your 5 'researched' stock up where the sun don't shine - have a nice day prof!